 |
Clearly not the case VZ. Proof? I read stuff posted on this side.
Commented: Sunday, May 12th, 2024 @ 10:41 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
With all due respect it appears that BBB accuses others of doing what he does.
Commented: Sunday, May 12th, 2024 @ 8:11 am
By: Van Zant
|
|
If the only media you consume are dishonest, your viewpoint will likely be dishonest, too. The American MSM stopped doing real journalism, and moved to what they call "advocacu journalism" some time ago, and that amounts to being propagandists for a particular side instead of journalists. The more liberal media of some foreign countries still do real journalism to a point. And, Bobbie, you only cite the leftwing sources if you cite any sources at all.
Let me give you an example of the difference in US media. The New York Times has never been anything but a propaganda sheet. Before Bezos bought it, the Washington Post on the other hand, while it had a recognizable liberal bias, it still did real journalism where you could get accurate information and a semblbance of both sides. When I travelled to DC, I always bought both the more conservative Washington Times and the Washington Post, but I never bothered with pickiing up even a free copy (as on international flights) of the New York Times. Sadly, since Bezos bought the Washington Post, it has become like the New York Times, so I don't bother with it anymore. On the other hand, when I am in an airport lounge in the UK, I read all of the newspapers across the spectrum that are available, because all of them, in spite of their slant, all still do real journalism.
Commented: Sunday, May 12th, 2024 @ 7:29 am
By: Conservative Voter
|
|
If you only consume media you agree with, you cannot consider yourself an informed individual.
Commented: Saturday, May 11th, 2024 @ 4:56 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
What we really need is to get out deporter-in-chief, Donald Trump back in the White House to deport all these illegal aliens back to where they came from.
Commented: Saturday, May 11th, 2024 @ 5:40 pm
By: borderhawk
|
|
Oh! The liberal MSM website Newsweek, that used to be a magazine? That link shows that they, too, are in the "fact check" spin game. So, you did get this from one of the phoney "fact check" spin sites. And they set up a similar straw man to knock down as I predicted. The legislation IS about whether illegal aliens will be represented in Congress, and the Democrats DID vote in favor of that.
Commented: Saturday, May 11th, 2024 @ 3:18 pm
By: Conservative Voter
|
|
Newsweek
www.newsweek.com
Commented: Friday, May 10th, 2024 @ 11:58 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Time to debunk Little Bobbie with his broken record assertion, that as usual is false.
If you did primary research on this bill by looking it up on an official Congressional record site and then read the bill and looked at the votes on the bill, everything in the post and the linked article is absolutely true. But I am sure Little Bobbie, instead went to one of those left wing spin sites that call themselves "fact checkers", many of them funded by far left totalitarian money man George Soros. Looking at the bill and the account of it, seeing the straw man those hack sites would set up just to knock down was obvious. I did not look at those spin sites, but the obvious straw man was to say the claim was that this bill would give illegal aliens the vote. That is never claimed in the article, but by spinning it that way, they can then say it does not. What the bill actually seeks to do is limit "representation" to American citizens. Representation is apportioned after every census based on population. The Democrats want that to include illegal aliens, because that would give them more seats in areas favorable to them, while Republicans follow the more Constitutional interpretation that representation should be based on number of citizens. By shifting the number of congressmen among states, that also shifts the votes of states within the electoral college. What this bill involved was whether to count illegal aliens for Congressional representation in the next census. Every Democrat on the floor voted for that and every Republican on the floor voted to limit it to actual citizens. ONce you drill down on the details, it is easy to see the fraudulent spin that lefties like these bogus "fact checkers" can make. And it is easy to understand that the article cited is absolutely correct.
Commented: Friday, May 10th, 2024 @ 10:12 am
By: Conservative Voter
|
|
A 2 minute search shows this post is absolutely not true and comes from that nazi punk Stephen Miller, a trump goon.
Commented: Friday, May 10th, 2024 @ 8:51 am
By: Big Bob
|
