|
Prendiegirl, WITN stated, as of June 3, that 47 people have been identified in the vandalism. What the hell do FERPA laws have to do with this situation other than being used as a "bleeding heart" cop-out, exactly?
In the state of NC, you're an adult at 16. Best I can recall, most of the 47 identified are over 16 years old. If it were my child and he got caught doing stupid s***, as my granddaddy used to say: "If you're gonna be stupid, you better be tough."
Commented: Thursday, June 13th, 2024 @ 11:46 am
By: John Valley
|
|
Hasn’t anyone heard of FERPA laws. Why don’t you all stay in your lanes. Hood blows everything out of proportion. There weren’t 57 kids just like the amount for the school isn’t 52 million but 42. What would you do if one of those kids was one of yours? Let the authorities handle it.
Commented: Thursday, June 13th, 2024 @ 10:50 am
By: Prendiegirl
|
|
The privilege is the free speech right given to all citizens by our Constitution.
Commented: Thursday, June 13th, 2024 @ 9:17 am
By: Hood Richardson
|
|
If HR were black and spoke to, and wrote about others the way he does, especially those in power, he would have been dragged out by his feet and set on fire long ago. Total privilege.
Commented: Thursday, June 13th, 2024 @ 8:32 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Nobody believes that "privelege" crap except the ultra-woke.
Commented: Thursday, June 13th, 2024 @ 6:40 am
By: John Steed
|
|
HR, to not recognize ones privilege, means you got a lot of it.
Commented: Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 @ 9:15 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Big Bob, In our form of government there are not supposed to be privilege cards. That give everyone big an small the right to become indignant when privilege cards are played.
Commented: Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 @ 12:55 pm
By: Hood Richardson
|
|
Your dislike for the Cheese-man is well documented. However, you inability to understand how privilege effects us al is astonishing. Aways a nail in search of a hammer.
Commented: Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 @ 9:19 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Ol' Bob, we can agree on one thing: Due to a sense of "entitlement", someone felt the need to not only cover their ass; they felt the need to cover several asses.
I'm not Dick Tracy or Batman but it doesn't take long to figure out that, in this situation, 2+2=71. Unless there's been some singing going on or there were incriminating postings dug up on social media, how were the people involved identified? Allegedly, the security system at WHS was disabled so......how could there be facial recognition and identification if the system was disabled? This is like a bad B-movie that got the Academy Award for Best Picture. I'm perplexed at how the handlers of this situation actually thought the public would be buy such a bullshit cover story? Somebody's effed up big time on this one, cuz!
Commented: Wednesday, June 12th, 2024 @ 4:59 am
By: John Valley
|
|
JS we are in agreement. I’m just pointing out the obvious reason for the hold up.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 12:57 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Shooting from the hip as usual there, Bobbie? Guessing without any knowledge of who is involved. And your far left ideology almost mandates you whining about "privelge" or "entitlement". That is an irrelevent side show. It does not matter who did this, they ought to be punished and made to pay restitution for the damage they caused. Let the chips fall where they may.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 12:39 pm
By: John Steed
|
|
Taxpayers should not have to shoulder the cost of this criminal mischief when it is known who did it. I do not trust this superintendant or this school board to do anything to get our money back.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 9:26 am
By: Bubba
|
|
This type of "prank" reeks of entitlement. I got 10 bucks that says it was done by some kids that mommy and daddy will protect.
Maybe I'm wrong, but the double standard most of BO posters say doesn't exist, exists.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 9:04 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Jack, graduating seniors would likely all be 18 or at least most of them, and therefore adults. Privacy laws would not stop them being charged as adults for the criminal activity they engaged in. That alone should be sufficient leverage to at least get them or their families to make restitution for the damage they did. School officials thinking taxpayers should absorb that is an outrage. So is the failure to come clean about what is going on with this matter.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 8:24 am
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
If our rubber stamp school board majority allows Cheeseman to continue with his coverup, time will tell nothing.
Commented: Tuesday, June 11th, 2024 @ 6:49 am
By: Rino Hunter
|
|
time will tell
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 11:21 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Lol I was being facetious
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 8:16 pm
By: Will Simmons
|
|
no, you don't, Bobbie. If a staff member gave a key, it is highly unlikely they did it knowing that this damage was intended, but even so they would have culpability because they should not have given a key to a student. If Cheeseman's looking into the matter has led him to know of beleive where the key came from, that person may also be someone Cheeseman wants to cover up for if they are his buddy.
Will - All it takes is one entry point if someone has the key.
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 8:10 pm
By: John Steed
|
|
So almost 60 people were able to enter and vandalize a school at the same time we are building a new school with limited entry/exit points for “safety concerns”. It seems WHS must be unsafe. When are we gonna build a new one?
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 7:54 pm
By: Will Simmons
|
|
Wish they would release more information, they can't release student information due to privacy laws, but they can about the key. I have spoken with very reliable people that the key did not come from an employee. In a time when you can go to a kiosk to get a key made, the old fail safe of marking a key doesn't really work.
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 7:29 pm
By: Jack Maggio
|
|
"He may have an idea who gave the key, and they may be his buddy." - JS
I read just fine
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 5:44 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Can't you even read, Bozo Bob? The Superintendant is involved in the COVERUP, not the actual vandalism itself. He had to sign off on doing nothing significant in response to the vandalism. The principle could not have done that on his own.
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 3:55 pm
By: John Steed
|
|
Yeah right, the superintendent is involved vandalizing a school. You're nuts.
However, I agree with your last statement.
Commented: Monday, June 10th, 2024 @ 3:06 pm
By: Big Bob
|