‘This Is Impersonation Of The President’: Expert Lays Out The Stakes Of Biden’s Autopen Controversy | Eastern NC Now

"These executive orders that we identified, there's no evidence of Joe Biden in first person, in his voice as president talking about them.”

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Tim Pearce.

    Former President Joe Biden may have unknowingly crippled fossil fuel projects because staffers may have abused their authority to sign orders the president never approved.

    Daniel Turner, founder of Power The Future, testified to Congress on Wednesday that White House staff may have used an autopen of Biden's signature in a major "deceit of the American people." Turner's group has called for an investigation into eight of Biden's executive orders over suspicions that they may have been signed without the president's knowledge.

    "This is impersonation of the president," Turner explained to GOP Rep. James Comer. "Staffers, of course, have a lot of leniency in what they do working on behalf of the president, but these executive orders that we identified, there's no evidence of Joe Biden in first person, in his voice as president talking about them."

    "When you ban the export of liquid natural gas and you never get asked about it in person, one has to wonder if Joe Biden did it or if a staffer did it on his behalf?" Turner continued.

    Comer, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, is leading a congressional investigation into the Biden administration's use of an autopen to sign executive orders as part of a larger probe into a White House cover-up of the former president's precipitous health decline.

    Turner cited an anecdote from House Speaker Mike Johnson about a meeting the speaker had with Biden. Earlier this year, Johnson relayed that he once met with Biden and questioned the former president on an order pausing liquified natural gas exports to non-Free Trade Agreement countries. Biden had denied ever signing the order.

    "He genuinely didn't know what he had signed," Johnson said. "I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, 'we are in serious trouble - who is running the country?' Like, I don't know who put the paper in front of him, but he didn't know."

    The story at the time had been taken as more evidence of the former president's mental decline. But, Biden may also have been honestly ignorant that his signature was on the order, Turner said.

    "Two things can be true: maybe he really didn't know what Speaker Johnston was talking about. Maybe he had no idea he passed this executive order," said Turner. "If the president was never asked about it, and he hides from the press, and there's no opportunity for him to get asked in public about it, how do we know he actually did it?"

HbAD0



poll#211
26 days after the October 7th Terror attacks on Israel, where over 1400 Jewish men, women and children were gruesomely murdered, and hundreds more made hostage: Should the Biden /Harris administration finally state that the administration's primary Middle East negotiating partner, Iran, is behind the funding and strategy of the aggressors, the Hamas Terrorists, or continue to take the more moderate position of "Don't," which is clearly not working?
  Yes, name Iran as the funding /strategy culprit, and begin to enforce the President Trump era sanctions to END Iran's ability to prosecute this war against Israel and the United States.
  No, Iran is a valuable partner in the motives of the Biden / Harris administration, and must not be named as the culprit and our enemy.
  I have larger concerns just to survive in this economy.
356 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?
    Turner said that in the course of these questionable executive orders being carried out, "lives were destroyed."

    "When you ban the export of liquid natural gas, there are hundreds of thousands of men and women who work in the natural gas industry. Lives are destroyed. People went bankrupt because of" an order Biden may not have knowingly signed, Turner said.

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
507 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD1

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government's offer is rejected, the battle continues, no confidence vote in parliament

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top