|
There seems to be some level of agreement on this thread about where the Commission candidates rank as conservatives. I agree with that. As conservatives it's probably:
1. Deatherage 2. Woolard 3. Edwards 4. Booth A liberal would probably rank them in reverse order of preference. There also seems to be a lot of avoidance of the issue Mr. Richardson brought up about the murky money and actions among the Victory Committee/Executive Committee leadership. There is just as much avoidance of the charges Mr. Hudson has made about Republican leadership's openly inappropriate actions against candidate Deatherage in this election season. They are both very real issues. Why the blind eye to extremely suspect behavior and extremely inappropriate actions? Why the aversion to transparency and accountability? Why such a concerted effort to protect the guilty?
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 10:00 pm
By: Van Zant
|
|
In our county commission race, there are two overriding issues - 1) will we get a majority that elects Republican leadership for the board instead of doing a sleazy deal with the Democrats for control, and 2) will we get a board that will cut wasteful spending and cut taxes.
When I look at the candidates, Stan Deatherage is the only one with a proven record to support both propositions. He is the clear first choice, and since we only get one vote, he will get it from me. On the other end of the scale is Ed Booth who has a proven record of doing corrupt power deals and raising taxes. He should not even be considered. Then there are the two in the middle. Woolard makes a strong commitment to both electing a Republican leadership team and to cutting taxes. He has no record yet, but his commitments are firm. Also, there is John Edwards, who won't give you a straight answer and commitment on what he plans to do. Edwards is little better than Booth. If I had a second vote, it would be for Woolard, but I don't so I will stick with the candidate with the proven record, Deatherage. On Bobbie, he cleverly calls himself a small "r" republican, not a capital "R" Republican, and there is a huge difference. Clearly, however, he is a socialist, and that does not even qualify as a small "r" republican.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 6:13 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
I consider myself a republican. Not MAGA. Not a right-wing whacko. Just an average person who thinks we have more in common as people than we do differences.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 4:24 pm
By: big Bob
|
|
Stan, Parties are not supposed to engage in primaries, and that includes turnout for primaries. Turnout in a general election can be critical to whether Republicans or Democrats win races, but that is not the case with primaries. With the funds we had available, we concluded that using them for radio and facebook offered the best bang for the buck. I would have liked to have been able to have done at least one mail piece, too, but we did not have the funds for it.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 3:49 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Turnout makes a whole lot of sense for those races where they are one on one against a Democrat, but one has to think a bit to see how it impacts county commission races with limited voting. Cypress Landing has always been a turnout machine, which needs little help, and it is the base of one county commission candidate. More turnout elsewhere in the county would tend to help both of the other two. In the best case scenario, with enough turnout, and a fairly even split among Republicans, Booth could be the one to go bue-bye, but that is a long shot.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 2:49 pm
By: Rino Hunter
|
|
Steve: What is the "Victory Committee" doing at this point to influence the turnout, since they did nothing to drive turnout in the primary?
I have my media outlet, Eastern NC NOW, but the Executive Committee does not use me since my politics are far different than that of the RINO Whisperers and RINOs in charge of the Executive Committee, so, I am oblivious to what could happening, unknown by me. By the way, please elucidate as to which out-of-county, and, or out-of-state media that they will be using to accomplish this promised turnout.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 2:29 pm
By: Stan Deatherage
|
|
It seems that some Victory Committee members are deaf, dumb, and blind to what other Victory Committee members are up to.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 12:58 pm
By: Van Zant
|
|
Stan, off year elections like this one are turnout elections. Motivating your own side's base to turn out is what wins or loses elections. We have to reach the low propensity GOP voters with a message that will get them to the polls, and then they vote for the whole ticket. But if they stay home, like in 1982, we are in trouble. At the last Executive Committee meeting, it was explained that the Victory Committee was looking at past experience and current polls to determine what issues and races accomplish that. The name of the game is simple - what is likely to motivate the highest turnout possible of GOP voters.
Those who do not understand the importance of turnout in this particular election year, should read the following article from the Daily Haymaker: dailyhaymaker.com Expertise in campaign messaging is a limited resource, and committees guiding campaign plans have to rely on those resources that are available locally. Committees which direct these campaigns need that expertise if they are going to be effective. Hood, I answered your argument about the city election and you have failed to respond with anything. If you have a specific allegation of some improper advertising, please give the details. I have not seen anything of that nature and would certainly not stand for it if I did. Please remember that a lot of people can put materials up on social media these days, so give some proof of who paid for it. I would agree that whoever put up those :Hood ornament" ads acted inappropriately, but that did not happen through the Victory Committee. Due to gas prices, this election is very challenging, and internal disputes do not help. These things need to be put out in the open early and disposed of.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 12:06 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Big Bob: Are not only a Democratic Socialist, but also a RINO Sympathiser?
By your recent comments here, I rest my continual regarding the fact that continued RINOs are an infestation problem for the local GOP.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 11:25 am
By: Stan Deatherage
|
|
Clearly Beaufort County is not as extreme as you.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 11:21 am
By: big Bob
|
|
In violation of the plan of organization, ethics and fair play
candidates are allowed to serve on the victory committee. Steve, Get your head out of the sand. The Beaufort County Republican Party has paid for ads attacking Republicans. The Victory Committee has interfered in elections, in opposition to Republican candidates that resulted in Democrats winning those seats. Financial reporting to the Board of elections is a disaster making it difficult to know where the money is coming from and where it is going.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 6:26 am
By: Hood Richardson
|
|
There are no victory committee approved candidates for county commissioner? Duh, one of the Victory Committee members IS a candidate for county commissioner!
This is like a SNL skit. Title it, corruption.
Commented: Tuesday, October 27th, 2026 @ 7:50 am
By: Van Zant
|
|
Steve: I not been informed as to anything that is being done to benefit my campaign.
It would be nice if someone in the so called Victory Committee would keep me in the loop. I do know that the RINOs and the RINO Whisperers on the Executive Committee have been working against me in this campaign, and against what Conservative ideals (for more than a decade noe) I have empirically represented for over a three decade now as a core Beaufort County Republican of the real variety, and as Beaufort County Commissioner for 26 years. If the tide has turned to a favorable opinion of this indisputable Conservative Republican, I would like to know it, and what amends are being made to finally help, and STOP hurting my campaign. It is October 26, 2026. The election is in one week; early voting started 1.5 weeks ago. If something is being done, or has been done with some out of county, or out of state media group, I would like to know it.
Commented: Monday, October 26th, 2026 @ 10:03 pm
By: Stan Deatherage
|
|
Chairman Garris and the Victory Committee are willing to blow the local GOP to smithereens for the chance to get Deatherage. Don't worry Ed (Booth). These savvy Repub "insiders" aren't focused on you at all.
Commented: Monday, October 26th, 2026 @ 9:00 pm
By: Van Zant
|
|
Steve, the point Hood is making I believe is that the Executive Committee is taking sides and it shows on the official BOCO Republican Party page. The members of the Victory Committee (Carolyn Garris, Ashley Woolard, Keith Kidwell, yourself, and perhaps others) are also the folks running the Executive Committee. They are essentially one and the same. If the Victory Committee isn't involved, then what is appearing on the official party page must have been blessed off by the Executive Committee decision makers, with or without a consensus vote of the EXCOMM, which is still equally improper and inappropriate.
Take a look for yourself: The Beaufort County Republican Party Facebook page has garrisbocogop@gmail.com listed as the point of contact. Would this not be the chair herself? Two political ads for Ashley Woolard were posted on the page three days and six days ago respectively. Other ads for Woolard appear on July 4th, September 18th and 25th, Oct 6th and 11th. No ads appear for Stan Deatherage or John Edwards in the same timeframe. Stan Deatherage requested and sent an ad to be placed on the page within that given timeframe. The ad was not posted nor any response received from the page administrator.
Commented: Monday, October 26th, 2026 @ 6:00 pm
By: David Hudson
|
|
Hood, the point of having experienced campaign committees like the Victory Committee is to see that party campaign funds are used effectively to try to elect the entire ticket. I have never heard anyone on the current committee address supporting one Republican over another, to do so would be highly improper. The committee did not even meet during the primary.
There are no "victory committee approved" candidates for county commissioner and the committee has done nothing to take sides in that race. The committee does not ccontrol the facebook page or website. We are presently advertising on radio and on social media. I have heard of the highly inappropriate "Hood ornament" ads, but have seen nothing to indicate that the Victory Committee paid for or had anything to do with such ads. The Victory Committee spent money SUPPORTING Tex Melton and Shari Clark, certainly NOT anything opposing them. As an individual voter, when I look at who to vote for I look at two things. One is whether they stand strong on conservative issues, not take evasive and uncertain positions. If multiple candidates pass that test, then I look at their record. Do they walk the walk as well as talking the talk? When you look at the three Republicans running for county commission, it is easy to put them into a 1,2,3 position, with the Democrat, of course, being 4. With "limited voting" however, we only get one vote, not the three we should have in any fair and democratic system.
Commented: Monday, October 26th, 2026 @ 5:26 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Folks may or may not agree with Hood depending on what is being discussed. However, Hood has made a point of shining a light on the corruption that exists within the leadership of the Beaufort County Republican Executive Committee and specifically, the Victory Committee. For all of the naysayers, one only needs to look at the Beaufort County Republican Party Facebook page. This page is run by the Executive Committee and Carolyn Garris as the point of contact. During an election, the Executive Committee should be promoting all Republican candidates for County Commissioner. Sides should not be taken or favor shown to one candidate over another. This is not the case. Ashley Woolard, a Victory Committee member, has two or more ads promoting him on the page. No ads promoting Stan Deatherage or John Edwards appear on the page. Stan requested to have one of his ads included on the page a week ago. However, his ad was not posted, nor were Ashley Woolard's taken down if they had been posted mistakenly. Both Edwards and Deatherage should rightfully be outraged regarding this issue. It appears that Hood is correct, that the Victory Committee is playing favorites, and that the corruption within the party is on full display for those who observe.
Commented: Monday, October 26th, 2026 @ 3:57 pm
By: David Hudson
|