Movie Night | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Last night my wife and I went to see a movie. It was a very popular movie and we were required to wait our turn in a long line to purchase our tickets. After purchasing our tickets we proceeded through the metal detector to ensure we were not carrying weapons. At about this time, there was a commotion in the theater as about 50 people had found an unlocked door, and entered the movie without purchasing tickets, or passing through the metal detector!

    The manager of the theater was called, but I was dismayed by his decision!

    He allowed all of the intruders to stay and watch the movie without paying or going back through the metal detector! His sole request was that they all promise to turn off their cell phones during the movie. As a result, some people who had been waiting in line were denied admission to the movie because there were no empty seats remaining! Everyone was concerned about the identity of these invaders and what potential harm some of them might be considering for the other patrons since they had not been screened.

    Do you agree with the decision of the theater manager? Or would you like to have seen something different for his resolution?

    Actually, this particular movie theater has been having the same problem every day since 1954 and the managers' (the manager has been changed periodically over the years.) decision is always the same. There have been demands to lock the door, and various managers have promised to do so, but they never do! Once in a while one of the people who entered illegally is thrown out, but it is usually at least his third offense of dumping soda down a person's back who was sitting in the row in front of him.

    In 1986, the theater manager gave lifetime passes to all of the trespassers who had entered the theater illegally up to that time. He did this with the promise from the Board of Directors that they would lock the door in question and prevent anyone else from entering the theater without paying. The Board of Directors has reneged on their promise.

    Are you disgusted? You should be! Won't you join me in demanding that the manager lock the door in question and eject anyone who is in the theater without paying? This manager reports to a board of directors who could demand action. One of the members of the board lives in your area.

    Please look up his or her address and demand that the manager take the appropriate action immediately. Those local members of the Board of Directors are the telephone directory under United States Government. OK, by now you certainly realize that the movie theater I am speaking of is our country, the United States.

    The unlocked door is of course our porous border. The people waiting in line who must wait to perhaps see a later movie are the millions of people seeking legal admission to this country. The metal detectors are the background checks that are performed upon those legal immigrants. And the promise to turn off their cell phones is the Progressives' promise that the illegal immigrants will only get probationary citizenship. The illegals who are thrown out after at least three times of dumping soda down another patron's back represent those who are convicted of drunk driving (at least) three times, or more serious felonies. 1954 was the year of "Operation Wetback"; a very successful roundup and deportation of illegal immigrants. 1986 was the year Ronald Reagan gave amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants upon receiving the promise that the border would be sealed.

    I might emphasize that the vast majority of illegals just want a better life. I would invite them to get in line and enter this country legally. But, sprinkled among them are terrorists and drug cartel members.

    What should we do? First, the border should be sealed by whatever means is necessary. Second, we should allow those who are here illegally to self deport. They will self deport when they realize we are serious about the next step. Third, we should change the law to make a first offense of illegal immigration punishable by a minimum of ten years in prison, subsequent deportation, and a lifetime ban on ever entering this country even as a tourist.

    After these three steps have been completed, we can discuss changes to our immigration system. We (the citizens of the United States) have been lied to in the past. We should not accept new affirmations of those promises. We need action on the part of the federal government. Only after no illegal incursions into this country have been made over a consecutive twelve month period should we allow discussions on changes to the immigration system.

    There are a few things that you can do as a citizen. First, send a copy of this column to the President, each of your Senators, and your Congressman. Attach a note stating that you expect them to follow this outline. Second, share this with everyone you know and ask them to do the same. And, every time you are in a line for any occasion (i. e. movie), go to the head of the line and ask that person if they believe in amnesty for illegal immigrants. If they say "No", move to the next person in line. Keep moving back until you find a person who says that they are in favor. Then cut in line in front of them and hand her or him a copy of this column. After all, they just said they were in favor of people cutting in line!
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( November 26th, 2014 @ 6:32 am )
 
Today most professions require Continuing Education to keep your license. Most do it on "attending the course" rather than having to pass another test.

The last big test I took, outside my LUTCF degree, was Series 6 Securities. It is tough. I tried to get ready on my own and was totally frustrated. For 3 days I paid for and attended a good course which prepared all of us much better.

At the end we took a sample test. Prior to taking it the instructor said, "There will be multiple choice options check. Some are obvious and most can be boiled down to 2 good answers. At that point ask yourself: 'Which of the 2 comes closest to TELL THE TRUTH, NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, TO YOUR CLIENT.'"

That was the challenge when I came to the pulpit 3 times a week as a Baptist minister / whenever I sold insurance without Mutual Funds / when I sold them with Mutual Funds requiring I have a Series 6 license.

I saw too many fellow ministers and financial advisers telling clients what they wanted to hear to sell a policy or religion---that could be a bad mistake. Anyone who tells people what they think they want to hear, rather than challenges them to THINK ~~~ IS A DANGEROUS PERSON AND ONLY WANTS POPULARITY OVER HONESTY!
( November 25th, 2014 @ 8:47 am )
 
That's fine.

I'm way beyond grading at this point in my life. Education is a daily experience for me, and I know who I can learn from, and those that have little to offer.

I think way outside the box, and only get back into the box when I feel called to, but I still keep one foot out of the box to stay above it all.

You do know that they whole grading thing smacks of elitism.
( November 25th, 2014 @ 8:38 am )
 
I have multiple degrees ~~~ first from Emory / then Southeastern Seminary / then Life Underwriting / then Securities / then the School of Hard Knocks whose colors are black and blue.

To stop the empty excuses I give you now an "F+" ~~~ now put some thought to the outline I proposed in another post. I want a reasonable explanation as to "what have Conservatives conserved????
( November 24th, 2014 @ 8:23 pm )
 
Yeah ...

Well, I'm pretty far beyond college at this point ... even your dear Emory.

At this point in my life, I may be better qualified to give your beloved professor a grade, rather than the reverse.
( November 24th, 2014 @ 6:48 pm )
 
Stan to Emory prof: "I though I did pretty good, sir"

Emory prof to Stan: "When I hear both sides explained clearly and then you tell me with reasoned thought which side you choose ~~~ the grade of "D" stands.
( November 24th, 2014 @ 3:15 pm )
 
I think it is a pretty good answer for two short sentences. Plus, it was an extremely accurate assessment.
( November 24th, 2014 @ 3:03 pm )
 
Sorry, Stan --- empty answer akin to "because I think so"... would get you a quick "F" at Emory, good buddy.

I know you can do better with some real thought and many of the new readers would be glad to hear your wisdom on this. You can do so much better---and I, for one, know it.
( November 24th, 2014 @ 9:22 am )
 
The Amateur has well exhibited his knowledge of the Constitution, which is proved pathetic. History will judge this president harshly.
( November 24th, 2014 @ 9:16 am )
 
Is it possible that your understanding or "The Constitution" and his are somewhat different. Remember, his law specialty is "Constitutional Law." He has the degree / he has been a community organizer in Chicago / from his words, he has some gifts in speaking that only wise and well-trained Black Preachers possess.

Just saying, Stan ---
( November 23rd, 2014 @ 8:37 pm )
 
I have nothing in common with The Amateur.

I swore to defend the Constitution 5 times and I did. He is sworn to defend it and he did not.
( November 23rd, 2014 @ 6:53 pm )
 
Then you, of all people should sympathize with the President as an object of hate and frustration. He went in with tons of expectation out of minorities who gladly voted for him. They were expecting more free rides and he didn't do such.

He missed a perfect opportunity to step to the mic and tell people of color and welfare that the jig was up and money was out so "get a public works job" we can provide of get one from private business. Either way you will work the same 40 hours minimum taxpayers do or you can do the same thing they have to do--starve!

He had little to no effect over war expenditures forced onto him by the Bush lies on WMD and the Middle East. How dare a President avoid war. The cost of such with Kennedy and Viet Nam was more than high on this anniversary date.

I'm just saying~~~ quit the labeling and hating / work toward some kind on consensus / offer constructive criticism when appropriate / make the best decisions you can to make the most people happy with tax money spent.

In some cases, the people who hate and oppose you are the best measure that you are on the right track of public service!!! As a Baptist minister, the ones who often hated me most were the very ones the average church member knew to be an impostor ~~~ there for business purposes rather than integrity of character and service!
( November 23rd, 2014 @ 1:47 pm )
 
It was very subtle the changes I effected as a county commissioner.

A few large initiatives, which I did not get credit for, for if I did, they never would have happened.

Beaufort County is one whose electorate is far more Liberal than Conservative, so they got the government they deserved, and the property tax rate that they wished for. And that tax rate is about to jump again with the Liberals in control of the commission for so many decades.

There are few Conservatives in Beaufort County, so it was always a question of either the county electorate changing or me changing, and I was not about to change. i suppose their abstinence won out over mine.

I stand for too much to devolve into that type of politician, and now, I'm glad to be done with it.
View All Comments



Amnesty: It's here. Time is running out to save our country. Words with the Publisher, Op-Ed & Politics Governor McCrory releases statement on immigration executive order


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top