What an Atrocious Week for Democrats | Eastern North Carolina Now

No, America's golfing Neville Chamberlain of foreign policy, Hussein Obama, is not the only ineffective, incompetent, and patently dishonest Democrat on the national stage. It may well be a Democrat epidemic of grand sophistry all around.

    From top to bottom, it has been another incredibly bad week for Democrats. My analysis of this rash of so many impossible weeks is due to the fact that Democrat politicians are so easy to manipulate, that they are immune to the dictates of common sense. This wholly incorrect self-determinable status of immunity is a byproduct of the modern liberal Democrats' perception that they are somehow politically anointed, by God, to be bestowed the indelible police power to tax one to give to the other, and to buy thus political power to curry this divine favor to do such.

    That same misidentified sense of divine purpose to act as if immune to the dictates of real knowledge, is similarly imbued upon the liberal Main Stream Media that summarily morphed into a more viral strain of an even more liberal, without any basis in real principles, Obama Media Group (OMG) sometime in 2007. This co-dependent relationship between unprincipled, and poorly provisioned in intellect, journalists, who favor some Democrats over all others, is a similar construct of incompetence, where both would not exist without each other's support.

    It is a simple construct, where liberal Democrats, which is proven to be the vast majority of Democrats now, encumber the People of this democratically elected Republic, with an unrelenting debt to buy the votes of 'low information voters'. This vast cache of the lowly informed are the sustaining force for politicians that resemble the intellectual quotient of their publicly purchased constituents.

    While campaigning myself for elected office, I have often heard my opponent Democrats ply their would be constituents: "Why would you ever vote for a Republican, they will never give you the things you need, like we Democrats will'?

    To which, I would always counter: "Government can never give back to you what it has already taken from you."

    Now back to the political mindset that beggars the government to take from one to buy votes from the other; it was another incredibly bad week for unscrupulous Democrats.

    Let's begin with Democrat members of the congress that boycotted the historic Benjamin Netanyahu speech to congress. After that rousing plea for the survival of Israel, these bumbling airheads, mumbled Democrat talking points that were indefensible and patently unintelligible. Even North Carolina congressman David Price, 4th District, who once taught at Duke University, lent his support to the Obama sophistry. After watching Price stumble through an insipid explanation as to why he did lend his representative support to his Amateur president, rather than to the future safety of Israel and, in turn, his North Carolinian constituents, was an affront to my intelligence and caused me to wonder: How many of Price's past Duke students believe that they now deserve a refund of tuition?

    This motley collection of Democrat pitch people for their president's poorer performance was a "Democratic" sight to behold, suggesting to what Sophomoric lows they will descend to 'circle the political wagons' around their failed leader.

    Watching Secretary of State John Kerry paint Benjamin Netanyahu as a war zealot for not opposing America's Iraq War was the epitome of hypocrisy, but, remarkably, serves as the finest example of the Barack Hussein presidency.

    When Secretary Kerry met with the House Foreign Affairs Committee, he thoughtlessly stated: “The prime minister was profoundly forward-leaning and outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq, and may have a judgment that just may not be correct here,” in a provocative attempt to delegitimize Prime Minister Netanyahu’s cognitive understanding of his nation's prevailing, unabated threat posed by Iran's nuclear enrichment initiative.

    When Secretary of State John Kerry was Senator John Kerry, just months after 9/11, he sounded the tone and prose of a war hawk against the murderous intents of Al-Qaeda: first in Afghanistan, and then in Iraq. Former Senator Kerry knew that he would run for the office of presidency, and he did not want to appear as if he was a wimp on war, especially after his congressional hearing in the 1970's, when then former soldier Kerry spoke of his Vietnam experience, in his affected erudite accent; advising of the supposed atrocities by other American soldiers. That was kind of the in thing to do at that time for the ardent Liberal - to disabuse oneself of patriotism.

    Conversely, the in thing in 2003, after the worst one day attack by foreigners on our native soil, was to act all patriotic about killing Islamic terrorists. How short the memory of the wealthy, erudite, and outwardly pretentious John Kerry. Watching Kerry tow the Obama line on the fake reality of the overtly Liberal construct of "Violent Extremism" was definitely a cringe moment; maybe not to the extent of hauling poor James Taylor to France to sing his "You've Got a Friend" after not being present for the World Leader Protest Against Islamic Terror earlier in Paris. That was a sad, embarrassing moment for the great singer /songwriter.

    Another moment, even more embarrassing, was loyal Democrat Susan 'it was the despicable video' Rice's, who, incredibly, happens to be the National Security Adviser, statement on the Netanyahu Speech to congress: “I think it’s destructive of the fabric of the relationship,”

    Regardless, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did speak to congress, it was historic, and it was most effective, the most effective, well received speech given to congress in the last 6 years. No manner of bumbling behavior by highly partisan Democrats could diminish that.

    But to borrow the hackneyed expression, "when it rains, it pours", may be a, however cliched, best description of what happened next to the Democrat fantasy of American subservience to liberalism and the state in regards of yet more inescapable problems of just living Liberal. I mean the hits just kept on coming.

    I hear from my sources within our military of the growing aggravation of generals who prosecute the wars, so necessary to keep us safe here at home and abroad, of Amateur Obama insistence of fighting the ongoing real War on Terror, with only Obama's basket of tools: lies, deceits, fantasy-world constructs, containment rather than victory, and diminishing resources for war and warriors. With that truth ever present, retired Lt. General Michael Flynn, who served as the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, nominated by Hussein Obama in 2012, tells a stupefying story, to FOX News's Brett Baier, of The Amateur's deceit to the American People and all gullible Democrats that Al Qaeda was "on the run", was in direct contradiction of actual facts presented by every intelligence agency.

    It was 2012, Obama was in a close campaign after the ObamaCare debacle, and it was then that Candidate Obama's adviser's tacked toward foreign policy as their key issue, where Osama bin Laden had recently been killed by SEAL Team 6, and Al Qaeda was diminished to the point that the 'War on Terror would soon come to an end' as per The Candidate. Who will ever forget the Democrat National Convention freak show, where every Democrat politician with half a brain of intelligence, but a full microphone of speaking power, parroted one another: "Osama bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!", and "Osama bin Laden is dead and Al Qaeda is on the run!". It was their full-throated, half-witted mantra, and it was on the lips of every 'dim bulb' that paraded to that Charlotte, NC platform to prattle on ad nauseam.

    Sensing a severe conflict between the Obama narrative, and the consensus of the intelligence agencies was in abject contradiction, Brett Baier suggested the facts were diametrically opposed to what Obama said. Lt. General Flynn stated unequivocally: "I would say from my perspective, it was just the opposite. You can't sit here and say that Al Qaeda was defeated when we're still looking at elements of Al Qaeda that are conducting operations."

    This narrative by the 3 Star General Flynn is not the only narrative similar in scope and truth. Former Secretaries of Defense Robert M. Gates, a Republican, and Leon E. Panetta, Democrat, both served Amateur Obama, and both left office disgusted in unequal portions. Later, former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel is now leaving office; however, his memoir is yet to be published, and one can only wonder his story. These stories now trickling out regarding how a professional community organizer conduct war against a heinous enemy are gaining notable traction, especially in regards to the 'Al Qaeda is on the run!' vs. what actually happened in Benghazi as a product of 'leading from behind' in the Arab Spring, and how The Amateur's administration lied to the American public, and then participated in the resultant cover-up, which is now the grand scandal.

    For Amateur Obama, the truth is never 'the first casualty', rather, lies are a way of administering the Obama policies, as if there is a complete disregard for the morality of truth, which still plays well to core Democrats and the unprincipled stupidity of journalists within the Obama Media Group (OMG). Another leading Democrat who believes that the morality of truth and ethics does not apply to her is Hillary B. Clinton. If one wonders why I have supplanted the B. for the oft pronounced Rodham is due to Benghazi, and how well she earned that designation; however, using the capitalized B. is so much easier than the more proper descriptor Hillary Benghazi Clinton. She earned it, and Benghazi may well be the sum of her political existence; however, the "B." is quicker to say or write, rather than than expressing the full "Benghazi" on her every mention. so, my apologies to those that believe that she deserves the Hillary Benghazi, rather than the Hillary B. mention.

If quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck ... but then again: "What difference does it make?"

    Speaking of Ms. Benghazi: She is the Democrat that had the worst week of all, and quite frankly, it is starting to mount up to the point that I don't believe she has any remote chance of winning the presidency, and in fact, Hillary B. may not even win the nomination of the her own party. First it is discovered that her humongous nonprofit, the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, has been accepting money from foreign contributors, which is illegal if one of the principles is running for elected office, especially if the foundation in question is not a pure charitable organization, which the Clintons' is definitely not.

    Technically, Hillary B. Clinton is not running for office; however, she is acting as if she is running for the Democrat nomination for the offihad ce of president, which, remarkably, lends itself to the perspective of a supreme impropriety; not only for Republicans, but many Democrats as well. Her family's foundation is well know as grooming place for Democrat political activists, and a platform for stoking favor from big contributors. It is legal to use pseudo charitable foundation for such political activities if the contributors are Americans, it is illegal if they are foreigners and one of the principals is running for elected office.

    The huge question could be: Will Hillary B. Clinton use the "Vast Right Conspiracy" motif to diffuse her perception problem with thinking people? It was her motif in 1999 when Bill had his multitude of legal and ethical problems, as if by deflection of the truth, the Clinton's could continue to live be governed by a separate, yet parallel set of rules.

    Regarding that Clinton set of parallel principles, the select Benghazi Committee, under the leadership of South Carolina bulldog Trey Gowdy, discovered that Secretary of State Clinton employed a private e-mail address on her private home server, rather than using the certified, better secured state department email provided by her new boss - the United State government. Anyone that has ever worked in government knows that all records of government business is the property of the People of these states united, whether it is on a provided e-mail or one that is personal. The legal rule of thumb is that if an e-mail is provided by your government gig, then you use it for the government business, and your personal for the personal. The benefit is, if you are found to do government business on your personal e-mail, then your personal e-mail may be subpoenaed as public record. It seems to make better sense to keep the People's business separate from on'es personal business. Obviously, Ms. Benghazi did not see it that way, and the questions will persist until he private server is recovered and a forensic evaluation is conducted. If the server has been tampered with, it can probably be found out too.

    This is why I don't think Hillary B. is electable. That attitude that you exist on a separate plane of ideals than everyone else, and that you are somehow immune as a Democrat may not work for the newly anointed 'grandmother who now can see how middle America must live'. There is one more wild card, far beyond the fact that Hillary is nowhere as smart as her husband, and does not possess the ability 'to think on her feet', the liberal Main Stream Media will ditch Hillary B. if they can find a more liberal candidate as the Democrat nominee. This is how the OMG began its love affair with America's current Community Organizer-in-Chief. Hillary B. then was jut political fodder and left at the alter, when it was time to do battle against the Republican nominee in 2008.

    Does the Main Stream Media, and their version of their unprincipled special forces - the OMG - make that big of a difference?

    Yes, with those folks that are not too bright; folks that vote for candidates because they are cool, or Black or a woman, like Hillary. The Main Stream Media and the co-dependent Democrat leadership depend on that level of ignorance in their readership, or, respectively, their constituents. It is kind of like the "Mushroom Theory": Keep them in the dark, feed them #$%# and then they will grow.

    For my part, while I grieve for our country having an electorate with much of it possessing the attention span of a Facebook post, I do enjoy laughing at stupid people. And yes, I have been laughing a lot of late. For me, God has anointed me with that certain sense of humor, and there is no shortage of material.

poll#71
In light of former Secretary of State Hillary B. Clinton admitting that she co-mingled state department business, in her private e-mails, with her personal business: Should Hillary Clinton be forced to relinquish her private server, where e-mails were stored, and, ultimately, transmitted?
3.91%   It is Hillary's e-mails, it is Hillary's private server. Leave her alone.
92.74%   Hillary lost any sense of privacy when she co-mingled the People's business with her own.
3.35%   If it is not Facebook, I don't care.
179 total vote(s)     Voting has Ended!

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( March 20th, 2015 @ 8:51 am )
 
Frankly, Stan, I am enjoying all the Conservative posting. It now gives me something to criticize at all times in the same way you enjoy your position.

By the way, I appreciate your sobriquet now for me = "Left of Center." That is the correct one ~~~ unless you want to make it "Informed and thinking Conservative!"
( March 20th, 2015 @ 5:51 am )
 
A man in a bawdy house drunk is happy and not thinking about VD, Stan . . .
( March 19th, 2015 @ 9:07 am )
 
I believe that you are more concerned about my conservative nature than I have time to be.
( March 19th, 2015 @ 7:06 am )
 
Fracking and Drilling Offshore are THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES OF THE NEXT FEW MONTHS OF THREAT TO NC. . .

A wise old Baptist Preacher, Dr. R.G. Lee, had the bombastic Conservative Pastor of FBC Dallas say, "I wish I had your brains along with my preaching ability." To which Dr. Lee responded: "To put my brain in your head would be like putting a grand piano in a closet!!!!"

Before you wax long and eloquent on your Conservatism, Stan ~~~ check out the size of your closet, buddy!!!
( March 18th, 2015 @ 7:19 am )
 
Hillarygate stays forever / Offshore Drilling and Fracking of NC are "Gone with the Wind" ~~~ Please explain your editorial rationale for such, Stan . . .
( March 10th, 2015 @ 6:17 pm )
 
Lay it on her, Stan!!! The bitch is a Democrat / wife of Democratic President / she has done more treason than Bush / Cheney and certainly tortured POW's in Bengazi
( March 10th, 2015 @ 3:15 pm )
 
Hillary B. Clinton is speaking now about her e-mails after attacking congressional Republicans for their position against Iran getting a nuclear device, which was just after discussing female inequality in America.

Finally, once she got to the e-mail question, she equivocated her explanation as that she did not want to use two devices in collecting and answering e-mails.

Understandably, I too would only wish to use one device as well; however, unlike Ms. Benghazi, I have a nimble enough mind to realize that one can filter both emails on one device, unless the state department required the two device system for security purposes, and then, of course, she would need to use two devices.

Wow! She just said that she would not give up her personal server for a forensic investigation. That server is owned by the People of the United States, irrespective of who paid for it, and Hillary Benghazi Clinton should be smart enough to know that at this point.

If she does not, this elderly grandmother is not smart enough, or her mind, at her advanced age, is not nimble enough to realize the obvious, and is not qualified to be president of these states united.

Ms. Benghazi is not electable, and the sooner Democrats realize this, they might have a chance in 2016.
( March 10th, 2015 @ 10:39 am )
 
Stan~~~you had such a streak of "nice" when snow was on the ground and you could throw snowballs at the squirrels in your yard, man . . .
( March 10th, 2015 @ 10:32 am )
 
Yeah, "HANDS UP, DON'T SHOOT"!, "BUSH LIED, KIDS DIED"!

It really is not too difficult to know the liberal mind.
( March 10th, 2015 @ 9:48 am )
 
Let's not bring up Tricky Dicky Nixon nor Dick Cheney over POW torture...shall we
( March 10th, 2015 @ 9:21 am )
 
Some Republicans make mistakes, don't do what they promised to get elected.

The problem with Democrat politicians is that believe that they are shielded by a fawning press, and therefore they can govern as patently dishonest. Plus, selling off America for the votes of the lowly informed, which is the core of the Democrat party, leaves a bad taste in the mouths of we patriots.

Who could ever forget OBAMAPHONE! and HANDS UP, DON'T SHOOT!, which may be one of the latest Democrat scandals.

Without the OMG, Obama and Holder would have been impeached years ago for their many many lies and dishonesty.
( March 10th, 2015 @ 7:55 am )
 
Old buddy ~~~ how is it that Democrats can never do any good and Republicans never make mistakes???

None of us is perfect / all of us can criticize rather than applaud that which is Progressive. In my view, your outlook is REGRESSIVE and I know you are so sure you are right, that you are "never" wrong . . .
View All Comments



Pursuing Health Care Freedom Clarion Call, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Tough Decisions To Be Made About Incentives And The Gas Tax

HbAD0

 
Back to Top