WWLD: Democrats 'say the Darndest Things' - Volume I | Beaufort County Now | It has been weeks of it; a culmination of years of it, and when does it end?

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's note (December 05, 2015): With America now demonstrably under attack within our shores by Obama's "Jayvee Team", ISIS,, as well as other Islamist Terrorists; we need to continue to examine how we were brought to this point by this weak and feckless president, and what can be done to stop him from doing any more damage to our Republic, to the infrastructure that provides safety to our citizens.

    To that extent, we have begun, and will continue to bring to the fore our best opinions to support this truth here at the top of our massive, and multifaceted BCN platform; however, please feel free to use our leading edge navigation and Search to find these posts at your leisure.

These sad Democrats, personified in this post, are discussed within, and are part of a little used, but oft considered category here in the BCN Op-Ed section - WWLD (What Would Liberals Do?)

    It has been weeks of it; a culmination of years of it, and when does it end? And, although it continues ad nauseam, it was what John Kerry mumbled, in France as a hypothesis, that there might have been a "legitimacy or rationale" to the Charlie Hebdo attack as juxtaposed against the horrific, unprovoked Friday the 13th massacre, which reminded me: Liberal Democrats will, on certain occasions, 'say the darndest things'.

    These reoccurring Democrat comments manifesting this certain Liberal angst of their honest profession that a probable moral equivalency exists, and a correctable reason for that evil drives their 'group think', perplexes the rest of us ... well, certainly, at least me. In the John Kerry 'brain fart' episode, occurring recently in France, he considered that the discriminant Charlie Hebdo attack was, somehow, less wrong than the in-discriminant Friday the 13th Paris massacre exemplifies how Liberals rationalize events, and why they eventually govern as they do, how they politicize that process. In this evaluation, one can ascertain certain threads of conventional Liberal thought that represents the core Democrat subtext to nearly everything they do as governing leaders, and how they manage their low-information electorate in the bargain.

    Consider, first, their response to the Behghazi attack on 9/11, 2012. They first 'legitimized the rational' of that embarrassing attack as the fault of a "despicable video", "The Innocence of the Muslims". When America seeks swift justice for the murders of "Four Dead Americans", they summarily put the filmmaker in jail for over two years, and over a year later arrested one Libyan flunky, who is still awaiting trial (for about two years now). This is the response of Democrats to avenge the murder of United States emissaries, and this is, and will be, the full extent of that response. Intuitively, I well understand their Democrat logic here: Suspend the 1st Amendment rights of an American filmmaker, arrest him for "causing the attack", and arrest one token "hijacking a great religion" kind-of-guy for perpetrating that attack - a perfect Liberal's moral equivalency all around.

CNN's Jake Tapper seems to have remembered a principled journalistic spine here. Remarkably, this foreign born American citizen does not understand how the 1st Amendment works, but, should he have been jailed?: Below.



    Consider, second, the fact that Hussein Obama and Hillary B. Clinton cannot name our enemies for what they are, and how they will employ a tortured lexicon of code words to express that constant enemy, then one can fully understand the core of the Democrat mind. Now, that the Hillary B. Clinton campaign is heating up, as she fully reveals her candidacy to her Democrat primary electorate, simultaneously, as the full necessity to exterminate ISIS (Islamic State) remains, she is finally identifying our enemy as "Radical Jihadism". She also commented that referring America's as "'Radical Islamic Terrorism' is a distraction". I reckon that is an improvement over whatever Democrats didn't say, or and never did do in regards to defeating this ominous, unambiguous threat, but one has to question why the 'tip-toeing' around the subject of who our obvious enemy is. Even American ally King Abdulla, a Muslim of the extra-vulnerable Jordan, admitted, "This is a war, as I said, repeatedly within Islam and unfortunately over 100,000 Muslims have been murdered by Daesh (Islamic State)". Understanding that the Jordanian King fully understands the basis of his nation's ever present threat, and is prepared to rally his nation to defend itself against a named foe: Why can't American Democrats do the same?

    While Obama is overseas on one of his may trips abroad, as he furthers his image as the Pacifist leader 'of the willing' on the World stage, he has no trouble naming Republicans, who he admonishes back here at home as if they are the real enemy, even mocks them as ironically sissies, rather than doing what a real leader would do: Rally the coalition 'of the willing' to defeat their common enemy and their evil ambitions ... To defeat ISIS where they live now, before they fulfill their promise of grand murder in America, before they continue their wanton genocide within our shores upon our people as they have upon Middle East Christians.

    Hussein Obama has professed that he has no real intention of defeating this threat, while he is constitutionally sworn to do otherwise, and wishes to pack off this problem, of his own making due to his many failed foreign policies, on the next president, possibly Hillary B. Clinton.

Here Hillary uses tortured talk to express what should be a simple premise - even claimed in the most recent Democrat debate that, 'this is not America's fight' - while Bernie stumbles on about an issue that is well outside of his Socialist Senator pay grade, which is completely incapable of understanding: Below.



    The problem with Hillary is that she, too, has a skewed, undetermined view of who America's sworn murderous enemy is, or how to prosecute a defense of the people she wishes to serve as president. In the span of one week the architect of the failed Obama/Clinton Doctrine on Middle Eastern Affairs, switched from a relative ambivalence to protect, by promising to continue the failed Obama no-plan to proceed, to a passive promise to do more to combat "Radical Jihadism".

    As more Islamist Terrorist attacks persist worldwide, and more here in America, Ms. Clinton's passive words, her pale promise to protect our people will fail to inspire an understanding that she could ever become a creditable American president.

poll#89
Should America accept Syrian refugees right now, as prescribed by the Obama Administration, or should Congress legislate to pause the process until a more proven vetting apparatus is in place to inhibit possible ISIS infiltrators?
10.84%   Yes, Obama is right, we should show the refugees compassion, and admit them as soon as is possible.
79.52%   No, Congress is right, we should pause the process to be more certain that terrorists aren't among them.
9.64%   It does not matter.
83 total vote(s)     Voting has Ended!


poll#88
Considering the fact that the Democrat Mainstream media has taken a "hands-off" policy in regards to Democrat scandals for the purpose of providing cover to a Democrat Department of Justice's choices to not pursue criminal indictments on proved Democrat criminal behavior: Is there a double standard for the Democrat Mainstream media?
88.41%   Yes, what is the practice for the Republicans should be proper for Democrats.
7.25%   No, Democrats should be immune from serious investigation and prosecution because they care so much more.
4.35%   I don't care, I prefer the low-information approach to life.
69 total vote(s)     Voting has Ended!


poll#85
If you could vote today for one of the Republican front runners for the GOP primary nomination: Who would it be?
11.07%   Donald Trump
26.64%   Ben Carson
13.52%   Carly Fiorina
2.87%   Jeb Bush
33.61%   Ted Cruz
12.3%   Marco Rubio
244 total vote(s)     Voting has Ended!

Go Back
HbAD0

 
Back to Top