The Clinton Sanger Connection: Hillary's Misplaced Admiration | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Jimmy Carter knew exactly what he was doing when, in 1979, he established the Department of Education, creating an iron link, permanently fusing the federal government to the United States public education system. The teachers tasked with enlightening our children, our future leaders, are students themselves of Saul Alinsky and other radicals from that era.

    As a result, our children are indoctrinated, not with truth, but with radicalized socialism. Many events that should be covered, events vital to America and American history, are kept far away from students. Kids who graduate from college are more likely to be radicalized because they simply don't know honest history and they have no defense against this severe indoctrination.

    One topic that's very relevant now, more so than ever before, and one that rarely gets accurate coverage, involves Hillary Clinton, her admiration of Margaret Sanger and Sanger's vision, and her unyielding support for Planned Parenthood.

    In order for me to paint an accurate picture, one that readers will appreciate, I must explain why Clinton's admiration for Sanger is bad, and why her support for Planned Parenthood is misplaced at best, intentionally corrupt at worse.

Margaret Sanger: A Concise Introduction


    Margaret Sanger was born in 1879 in Corning, New York. She was one of eleven children born to a Father who was atheist and a Mother who died young. Right away we notice two influential elements of her life that could help explain her radical views regarding abortion and minorities, views that will be addressed shortly.

    Sanger was very active within her community, but most of her energy was spent on her memberships in the American Eugenics Society, operated today under the name The Society for Biodemography and Social Biology, and the American Birth Control League, which is known today as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, or simply Planned Parenthood.

    While most scientists and activists working in the science of eugenics kept their true intentions undercover, Sanger was open about her vision for the future. It's worth noting, also, that most honest corporations have no need to change their name several times. It's when a name becomes permanently attached to a taboo-of-culture that it must be changed. There is a pattern of this happening within the Left, and more specifically, within socialist establishments in American history.

    On the surface these organizations were presented as having nothing but the best intentions for the women and children of America. On the surface these establishments claimed to support the rights of the poor and uneducated of our society. Unfortunately, the surface was an illusion. It remains an illusion today, and that illusion lives on through the various organizations that carry on behind closed doors. Margaret Sanger, so involved, knew precisely what was happening behind the scenes as she indoctrinated more and more vulnerable women with her warped and disgusting ideology.

    For a better understanding of the history of this woman Hillary Clinton admires so greatly, let us dig deeper into the organizations of which she was a member, and the ideals that she regurgitated and spewed over and over, day after day.

The American Eugenics Society


    In 1904, due to increasing international interest in eugenics, the Carnegie Institution in Washington established the Station for Experimental Evolution. The station was housed at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

    Charles Davenport was partially responsible for the creation of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, as well as the establishment of the Eugenics Records Office, another department of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. The Eugenics Record Office was involved in the study of eugenics, but was more focused on the subsection of human heredity research.

    In 1906, the Race Betterment Foundation was founded in Battle Creek, Michigan. The RBF sponsored several conferences in the early 20th century, all revolving around eugenics and the "improvement" of the various races around the world.

    Out of these conferences came the Eugenics Registry in 1928, which allowed for the stocking of family biological records, and the Galton Society, financed by the American Museum of Natural History.

    The Galton Society was mainly concerned with racial anthropology and was heavily involved in the Eugenics Education Society out of London England. The Eugenics Education Society played a major role in creating the English Eugenics Society, out of which came the First International Congress of Eugenics in London.

    As we close in on the creation of the AES, it's vital to understand the roots that have been covered hitherto. It's especially crucial to grasp the importance of the First International Congress on Eugenics, the Eugenics Record Office in Cold Spring Harbor, and the funding from the Rockefeller family and the American Museum of Natural History, for it is out of these organizations that the Second International Congress of Eugenics is born, and from this conference in New York, New York, the American Eugenics Society makes its appearance on the world stage.

The American Birth Control League


    On November 11, 1921, at Hotel Plaza in New York, Margaret Sanger organized the First American Birth Control Conference for an audience of notables and activists alike. Among other sponsors in attendance were Winston Churchill, as well as Theodore Dreiser.

    The speakers that night discussed birth control, as well as its potential to alleviate "major social ills" worldwide.

    The conference was cut short when Sanger and a fellow activist were arrested on charges of disorderly conduct. The charges were dropped, however, and Sanger was able to give her speech "The Morality of Birth Control" five days later.

    With the help of some very notable sponsors, Sanger created the American Birth Control League, or ABCL, with the stated intention of promoting birth control through "education and lobbying." Another goal, stated by Sanger herself, was the "banishment" of all disease, misery, poverty, delinquency, and crime. She was sure that birth control would accomplish this end.

    Today, the American Eugenics Society operates as the Society for Biodemography and Social Biology, and the American Birth Control League is now know as Planned Parenthood.

    In 1942, the International Planned Parenthood Federation was established, carrying Sanger's radical visions worldwide.

    Hitherto, we've only discussed the formal history of these organizations. If this were the sum of it all, I'd have no case for corruption, I'd have no reason to point out Hillary's admiration for Sanger as something negative.

Sanger Exposed


    Margaret Sanger wrote an article in 1921 and had it published in Birth Control Review. In the article, Sanger wrote that "[t]he most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective."

    At the first Birth Control League conference of the same year, the Chairman, Edith Houghton Hooker, addressed the attendees with her opening remarks, in which she stated "...the people of all the world must realize that the most important problem on earth is the problem of population...and the purpose of this conference, as I take it, is to discuss ways and means of bringing reason into the realm of reproduction."

    We start to see a picture emerging of a grand scheme to control population, specifically population containing "undesirables." The overall theme of these early conferences and speeches was sterilization.

    Sterilization as an option isn't inherently bad. Several of the points raised by Sanger in her paper "Sterilization" are not wrong. Sanger points out the importance of a strong family structure at home in the developmental stages of a child's life. She references several studies that show how vital it is for a child to be raised in a sound environment.

    The problem comes when the members of these organizations get tired of waiting for society to get on board. By default, these people believe that they know what's best. We see it in our public schools everyday where teachers take the role of parents. Our federal government honestly believes that it can raise our children much better than we can.

    At some point, Sanger and her colleagues became impatient. Talks began and plans were drawn up to force sterilize whole communities. Since Sanger's main targets were the mentally disabled, poor, and minority communities, logic has it that the organizations today still target those groups. There's two places that you find a whole host of these types of people: prisons and psychiatric facilities.

    The beauty of targeting prisoners and people housed in psychiatric facilities is that you can control what they eat, drink, and do on a daily basis. And I'm not just rattling off theories.

    In 2013 the Center for Investigative Reporting broke the story of "dozens of female inmates" being illegally sterilized within California's prison system. As reported by Kathryn Krase, this issue is oftentimes viewed as a "tragic-but-past occurrence..." The truth, however, is that it happens everyday in America. And since the organizations behind these covert tactics are worldwide, it would be a safe bet to say that this is happening worldwide.

    There's multiple stories that follow the same script. Moreover, women are oftentimes deceived into consenting, or coerced into opting into a sterilization program. We see misdirection and misinformation from the mainstream media every single day concerning a variety of topics. Therefore it makes sense that the mainstream media would ignore these instances, especially if they're directed to do so by state and federal government entities.

    To be completely honest, I have a hard time believing that this wasn't Sanger's vision from the beginning. She certainly didn't say anything to convince me otherwise.

    - "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
    A direct quote from Sanger in her piece "The Wickedness of Creating Large Families"

    - "[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring."
    Sanger in her article "Plan for Peace"

    - "Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies... and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit."

    - "Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit[...]"

    - "Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth."

    Sanger's vision for America, as explained in her article "America Needs a Code for Babies" from 1934

    Again, some of her remarks weren't necessarily evil, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. Any length of prolonged reading of Sanger's work quickly reminds you that the woman was not rooted in reality at all. She promised to rid whole communities of poverty, but her solution was to kill the poverty-stricken.

    Professor John Galloway, Expert Adviser to the Comprehensive Biomedical Research Center in London, reviews The Oxford Handbook of The History of Eugenics as follows: "Whatever the motives and methods used to realize them - persuasion, education, coercion, sterilization, segregation, euthanasia and more - eugenics has stemmed from the belief that a population, 'race', or even the species, is 'degenerating' and in urgent need of improvement and revitalization."

    It should be clear to anyone paying attention that our federal government believes that it has the right to "fix" things, even if things don't need to be fixed. In reality, government creates the problem in the left hand and offers the solution in the right.

    Sanger believed that those with "bad genes" should be given a choice to either be segregated or sterilized. She believed that birth control would lead to a "cleaner race..." When it came to race, Sanger was dead set in her ways.

    In 1939, Sanger wrote a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble in which she explained: "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

    Sanger was one of the most racist people I've ever researched and she was even more dangerous. She was a huge threat to the black community due to her popularity and her ability to convince whole audiences that her intentions were pure, when in reality, they were anything but. Her vision was instilled into every organization that she established or had a hand on. Her vision is still put into practice today and is done so internationally.

    The undercover videos released in 2015 prove that Planned Parenthood is anything but pure. I highly doubt that the procurement and selling of infant body parts is the only tragedy happening within this most corrupt organization

    Hillary Clinton, for all of her faults and corrupt practices, is an intelligent woman. She knows Sanger's work in and out. Just like her college thesis on Saul Alinsky, her words on Sanger prove her corrupted character.

    Sanger laid out the path for Clinton, and Hillary followed, and continues to follow it to this day. She champions women's rights, as did Sanger, and as Sanger did, Clinton labels women as single issue voters. Instead of advancing their independence, she has done everything in her power to take rights away from them. This continues to be done through forced sterilization and by overriding a woman's most basic right to have a family. The tactics have been, and continue to be based on faulty science.

    Unfortunately, our traditional sources of media have let us down greatly. If it were not for the internet and the dedication of true patriots researching and spreading truth, we'd know nothing of the insidious tactics employed even today. Russell Allen is a Conservative writer and researcher. He is the owner and editor at Conservative Articles, a Conservative News website with opinion articles as well as factual, current affairs articles. He's on Twitter @ConservArticles as well as Facebook at FB.com/ConservativeArticles. He's 27, lives in southern-Granville County, NC. He's a Husband to one and Father to three.

poll#96
Considering that Hillary Clinton, from the recently concluded email investigation, is charged with gross negligence, dereliction of duty, was recommended that she lose her security clearance, while pathologically lying to congress, the press and the American People; and even though she was not referred for indictment because she is a Clinton: Will you?
12.84%   Vote for Hillary
76.65%   Vote for The Donald
10.51%   Vote for none of the above
257 total vote(s)     Voting has Ended!

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( August 1st, 2016 @ 11:48 am )
 
Well written current events as principled communication is, will become a piece of history. That is a big part of my life's mission.

It may be the only way we save the Republic.
( August 1st, 2016 @ 10:05 am )
 
The first thing I learned, once it finally sunk in with Beaufort County's voters that I was a tested and true Conservative, was that there would be two sets of standards: One for the more conventional dishonest Beaufort County commissioner and then one for the two far more Conservative, and brutally honest commissioners, of which I was one.

This tore the local Republican party out of its frame, for the party was growing, but unable to handle that shock of prior Conservative representatives as the party grew in a conventionally moderate area, with big batches of Liberals.

Hence, Beaufort County became known as a unequaled center for RINOs, desperately seeking community approval.

There are two sets of standards that we all must bear, but, on the positive side, it made me a better man, a more principle politician (as if that was even possible), and a better communicator.
( August 1st, 2016 @ 1:50 am )
 
Thanks for the comments guys. It feels great to write for an audience.

This article is timeless. It's so timeless that people have forgotten about the connection.

This one of the trivial issues, believe it or not, concerning the Clinton list of corruption. I hope to bring all of those issues back to the surface where they belong. It's especially important during this election cycle, for obvious reasons.

No one is perfect. No one.

When a Liberal runs for office, Liberals understand no one is perfect. However, when a Liberal is addressing a Conservative running for office, the standards go way up. Anything less than perfect is simply unacceptable according to the Left, unless of course, they're talking about themselves.
( July 31st, 2016 @ 11:24 am )
 
This may sound a bit crass, but when I read well researched and written posts such as Russell's fine post, I am reminded of a titular line from an old Alice Cooper song: "Dead babies can't take things from the shelf."

That is the Abortion on Demand reality, which is a major plank for promiscuous Liberals everywhere.

Thank-you Russell for making this political abomination real once again.

Who knows, you may have save a life down the road ... maybe more than one life, because this post will never come down.
( July 31st, 2016 @ 8:52 am )
 
I found Russell under a Granville County rock, just miles from the Piedmont fall line. He is capable of a whole lot more than research and writing what he knows to be true.

Russell is right in the middle of the Millennial pack, and went a long way to restore my waning confidence in a generation that, as a whole, spends far too much time whining, pitching and moaning than moving quickly forward to accomplish great things.

If there are any other Millennials out there that want an opportunity here at SNI, we are hiring, but ... you better bring your A game.

Oh, and leave the whining for Mamma. Chances are she'll listen; I won't.
( July 31st, 2016 @ 8:23 am )
 
Ditto, to Ted McDonald's comments. Thanks for the additional perspective.
( July 31st, 2016 @ 8:20 am )
 
Very interesting. Hope to read more of your research.



CommenTerry: Volume Eighty-Two A Conservative Refuge, Reality Check with Pat Riot, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Democrats, the Democrat Media and the Double Standard: Volume I

HbAD0

 
Back to Top