Many people have resisted getting what has been described as "The Vaccine Shot". Some may believe that it is not fully tested while others have concerns based upon our political leaders' statements condemning Pres Trump. Remember VP Harris saying that she would not take it if Trump recommended it. Apparently, she did not consider the full implications of what she was saying and the doubt that she was instilling in the minds of Americans. Of course, some may be influenced by the 50% of staff at NIH and CDC that have not taken the shot, as well as roughly 50% of the Congressional Staff. These details certainly minimize enthusiasm.
So what you ask is causing these Federal Staff persons to hold off taking the Jab? As you read what follows, you may get a sense of what is behind this issue and what it means for the average American.
The worst nightmareFor freedom loving PatriotsIs the threat that will be realized with the use of digital health passports that are being promoted by various governments and organizations in the United States and elsewhere.The use of these passports may be about to come true and have the result of marking you for life. There is a significant push two sneak these passports into America and various other Western democracies through the back-door. Big corporations as well as universities are testing the waters to find out how many Americans will accept this latest intrusion as an unavoidable element of life in the "new normal".
The trap has been baited with the promise that this will help you regain your former freedoms and that all you have to do is to submit to a small app on your phone that informs businesses whether you've been vaccinated or not. Will people walk into this trap in large numbers or small, nobody knows. But those that do will be surrendering their health privacy and eventually all of their personally identifiable information.
There is a small window opening with which to reject this attempt by big business, in collusion with big government, to impose the most invasive, intrusive and coercive measures ever seen on free people since the conclusion of World War II and the Nuremberg trials.
In America, businesses are imposing digital passports with the silent blessing of the Biden administration and a majority of the governors from both political parties.
Whether it is an app on iPhone, a bracelet with a scannable QR code or just an old-fashioned piece of paper, these passports will become more normalized and we will devolve into a "show me your papers" society.Most people from the Western countries don't want this to happen. But whether out of ignorance or through other reasons, many people will concede to this effort by their very silence. The majority will either rise up with a resounding "NO" that puts a stop to this unprecedented intrusion on personal privacy, or they will accept the passports as just the latest inevitability caused by the pandemic.
I hope that persons who read this article will take the matter of these passports seriously. Constitutional lawyers have warned that your employment status can be negatively impacted by an employee's failure to take the shot. In other cases, taking the Covid shot will be required to attend school. We must not allow America to become a police state. The decision to get the shot or not should and must be a matter of your own free choice.
Even in the fight against polio and other diseases devastating than the current pandemic, there was never a mandate to get a vaccine to the extent that one could not perform daily functions of life like going to work, boarding a plane or bus, entering a restaurant or store. I regret that this is where America is heading if we don't stop this movement right here and right now. I must confess that my wife and I both had the shot because we were hearing from the experts that this was a matter of public health for people of our age bracket. Since then however so much controversy has come into the picture that the average person does not know whether to take the shot or not.
States such as New York and Oregon are moving forward with making people prove they've been vaccinated in order to enter certain business venues. A handful of other states with Republican governors have held strong against the health passports including most notably Florida and Texas.
Health passports are not legal because they violate the informed consent requirement of the Emergency Use Authorization law.
Health passports also violate Title 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 according to attorneys with New Civil Liberties Alliance who offer free legal assistance to persons being forced to choose between their job or the jab.
It is worth noting that the University of Pennsylvania Health System was forcing employees to take the shot against their free will if they wanted to keep their job.
Approximately 60% of the American population feels that the shot is not needed considering that the illness, if contracted, carries a 99.7% rate of recovery. Despite this fact, the political establishment continues to bring all its resources to bear in order to influence people to take the shot.
State government such as Ohio and others are bribing people to accept the shot. If it were so good, why are so many people reluctant to take it and being willing to accept bribery? If the motives of the federal and state governments were truly based upon the interest of public health, it would be different. But there is more to this shot issue then strictly the shot itself which we will describe in more details in a calming article.
We have agreed in large measure to go along with the globalist tyranny that has been brought to us by the Chinese Communist Party and the World Health Organization, a United Nations agency funded by Bill Gates.
In case anyone believes that the pressure to get vaccinated will dissipate after they get their two shots, think again. The pressure will intensify and we know this because the governments of the world are already planning for the third shot next winter. From there it will continue year after year with annual updates as protection against whatever new strain has come along.
If corporations, schools and universities are allowed to get away with making people choose between shots and jobs, shots or their college degree, shots or not being able to travel, then every other political issue will certainly become moot. The globalist elites will believe that they can control our bodies and invade our bodily autonomy.
We have our backs to the wall to put it mildly. There have been warnings in various quarters about the plan for digital health passports because some people knew that the globalists have long wanted such a system, even before the onset of the pandemic.
There are a great many threats by these global elites that go directly to the survivability of the United States as we have known it for all of our lives. People like Bill Gates, George Soros, the Rockefeller foundation, the WHO, the World Economic Forum and the rest of the global establishment are behind this vaccination effort. As we stated earlier, this vaccination issue is less about world health than it is about population control. People see Bill Gates as a rich nerd but they don't see him as a global mover and shaker. Many thin people think that personalities such as George Soros are the second coming of the devil. That may be true but he is not the major influencer behind the vaccination effort. There are others besides these few people that are involved in this effort, but the GrandDaddy of all of them is a man named Klaus Schwab, ( no relation to Charles Schwab), who is a German born financier. He and his wife started the World Economic Forum and he is a proponent of the One World Government system that you have heard so much about. I have been doing research on the subject and will soon be providing a written article as well as a Podcast called The John Woodard Show.
These elitists included a requirement of lifesaving vaccinations for all in the U.N. Agenda 2030 Agenda identified as goal 3.8. Goal 16.9 requires a global ID and birth registration for everyone. Vaccine passports accomplished both of those goals.
Several years ago, I was among a relatively small group of people who were saying that U.N. Agenda 21 was going to use sustainable development as a tool to restrict a great number of individual freedoms and I say to you now that we are well on our way to fulfilling the goals of this organization unless we take affirmative measures to stop it dead in its tracks.