The Big Problem With The Stormy Daniels Hush Money Case Against Trump | Eastern North Carolina Now

If Donald Trump were to be indicted for having a tawdry tryst with a trollop, he should probably plead guilty post haste. But the case brought against him by the Manhattan district attorney’s office is not about whether or not he cheated on his wife with porn actress Stormy Daniels

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Greg Wilson.

    If Donald Trump were to be indicted for having a tawdry tryst with a trollop, he should probably plead guilty post haste. But the case brought against him by the Manhattan district attorney's office is not about whether or not he cheated on his wife with porn actress Stormy Daniels, and it's far more tenuous than his detractors would like to believe.

    The case for a felony indictment is complicated, and as Trump might say, has "big problems." To hang the former president's scalp on his office wall, DA Alvin Bragg will have to eventually convince a jury that no one may take otherwise perfectly legal steps to protect their reputation if they happen to be running for office. And that just doesn't make a lot of sense.

    First, some background. Daniels claims she and Trump had a fling in Lake Tahoe back in 2006. And in October of 2016, just as Trump was on the brink of becoming president, either Trump or people close to him realized they could be looking at what Bill Clinton's people used to call a "bimbo eruption." Trump allegedly reached a deal to pay Daniels $130,000 to not tell after kissing.

    Generally speaking, paying hush money is not illegal. It's two people entering into a contract not to talk about whatever happened between them. Call it gross, offensive, sordid, or unseemly. Just don't call the police.

    There were, however, some apparent problems with the way Team Trump paid Daniels. Bragg's office claims that the money was paid through Trump's turncoat fixer, Michael Cohen, and falsely recorded as Cohen's legal retainer. If prosecutors can prove that, they've got the Trump Organization for misdemeanor falsifying of business records. That would merely merit a slap on the wrist and hardly satisfy liberals who consider the orange man their white whale and have been trying to lock him up since he entered politics.

    However, if prosecutors can prove that the records were falsified to hide another crime, the misdemeanor becomes a felony. Since that is what Bragg's office appears to be shooting for, what, exactly, might that second crime be? Speculation has long been that it would be a violation of New York election law, meaning basically that Trump had Daniels paid off to protect his presidential bid and didn't report it as a campaign expenditure.

    Here's the problem: Wouldn't a high-profile businessman and television star whose every move was reported in the New York tabloid gossip pages long before he dreamed of the White House have other reasons to keep such an embarrassing secret? What married man would want a porn actress blabbing about a decade-old fling? Surely not only an aspiring politician.

    If payment of the hush money is to be viewed purely in the context of Trump's presidential campaign, that would mean anyone can enter into a contract with a willing party to not discuss a particular matter unless they are running for office. Daniels going public certainly would have hurt Trump's chances in the following month's election, especially after the damaging "Access Hollywood" video had already called into question Trump's character and fidelity. But even Citizen Trump had plenty of reasons to want her story kept out of the press.

    Bragg's office has not said if it will go for a felony indictment, much less confirmed what its legal theory would be, but impaneling a grand jury to pursue a misdemeanor against a former president seems like an ill-advised stretch and waste of time. Cohen, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges related to the payments, has been the star witness before the grand jury, which has also reportedly heard from another half-dozen witnesses.

    Daniels reportedly offered to testify before the panel, but so far has not been called. Trump was invited to testify but declined. Sources close to Bragg's office have reportedly signaled that a true bill could be imminent. Unlike a criminal trial jury, which must be unanimous to support a conviction, a grand jury can indict with a majority - hence the old legal saw about a prosecutor being able to "indict a ham sandwich."

    If Trump becomes the ham sandwich, Bragg's office will face a much bigger hurdle when the case goes to trial. Trump's lawyers will make a strong case that any payments made to Stormy were a tempest in a teapot. Then again, Trump's fate may not hinge on arcane interpretations of campaign finance laws. It may come down to whether 12 New York jurors want his scalp as badly as Bragg does.

Considering the current overwhelming obstacles inflicting stress upon America's working class: rampant inflation; energy insecurity; supply chain turmoil; banking failures; foreign policy disasters; government corruption; (DEI) Diversity Equity Inclusion narrative, with WOKE extremes practiced; Climate Change ideology; intractable crime wave in Leftist cities; wide open border by executive design; a permanently discredited Legacy Media; failed or failing education industry, just to name a few of the many: Who should Americans blame?
  Donald J. Trump
  Joseph R. Biden
  Leftist controlled Congress for the last 4 years.
  Bloated, incompetent bureaucracy weaponized and poorly managed
  The electorate, US, for putting these fools in elected office that utterly fail
278 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Considering how abjectly corrupt and civilly abusive the Left has become regarding the corrosive effect of their elected leaders; their entrenched and ruling bureaucracy; employing their failed Education Industry as Indoctrinators; their collusive private sector operators, such as the terminally discredited Legacy Media and Big Tech censorship of Free Speech: What will be the best course forward for hardworking Middle Americans, including the Patriot Class?
  Withdraw from society, go underground and plan for a resurgence when it is feasible to do so.
  Work within the confines of better policy by the People's government, once good sense and sanity is restored in the electorate at large, to achieve such.
  Are you a crazy, nut-job Insurrectionist? Everything is perfect within our plan to achieve our intended goals for the Socialist Left.
  Secession to form a true Constitutional Republic.
437 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Latest State and Federal

Less than 24 hours after a failed assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump — which left one bystander dead and three others, including Trump, injured — The Atlantic’s David Frum blamed the violence on the former president and his supporters.
The Biden campaign fired back at actor George Clooney on Wednesday after Clooney called for President Joe Biden to drop out of the presidential race, suggesting that the 81-year-old president has better stamina than Clooney.
Ray Epps, the man accused by many of being involved with federal law enforcement during the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, said over the weekend that Fox News host Tucker Carlson was “obsessed” with him and trying to ruin his life.
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services is hosting a virtual meeting on Friday, March 1, 2024, for the Standardized Foster Care Trauma-Informed Assessment Workgroup.
Cotton has been mentioned as a possible running mate for former President Donald Trump.
Former President Donald Trump said during a radio hit on Friday that he would be willing to take a cognitive test alongside President Joe Biden to let voters see the mental state of each presidential candidate.
NBC News’ Chuck Todd said Tuesday that Biden’s declining cognitive health has been an “open secret” for years, revealing that a senior cabinet member from the Biden administration suggested in 2022 that the president cannot run for reelection.
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro is testifying to Congress on Wednesday for a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the alleged conspiracy to suppress conservative voices under the guise of “brand safety.”


Back to Top