Stephenson Ruling Does not Require Racially Polarized Voting Analysis | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Andy Jackson.

    Legislators disagreed during North Carolina's recent round of redistricting on whether the General Assembly had to conduct a racially polarized voting analysis.

    This raises at least two questions. The first is "What is racially polarized voting (RPV) analysis?"

    At its most basic RPV analysis attempts to determine if White and nonwhite voters both vote as blocks. That analysis is part of the so-called "Gingles criteria" (from Thornburg v. Gingles, 1986) that courts use to determine if a redistricting plan violates the Voting Rights Act.

    So, is the General Assembly required to conduct RPV analysis before drawing districts?

    Newly appointed North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs seems to think so. She led a 2021 lawsuit that sought to force the General Assembly to conduct RPV analysis and use other racial data before drawing districts (page 33):

    Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief requiring the North Carolina General Assembly to adhere to the requirements of Article II, Sections 3 and 5, as set forth in Stephenson v. Bartlett, and specifically to perform a meaningful attempt to determine whether there are any districts compelled by the Voting Rights Act, which, at a minimum, requires the consideration of racial data to understand changing demographics and to perform a Racially Polarized Voting Analysis where the racial demographics indicate potential VRA problems before designating county clusters required in Senate and House legislative maps.

    Riggs' complaint was eventually dismissed, but the argument persists.

    However, litigants are unlikely to pursue that argument in state court. That is because the North Carolina Supreme Court already made it clear in its April 2023 Harper v. Hall III decision that there is no such requirement in Stephenson. The relevant section is from pages 129 through 132. Here is the bottom line:

    The holding from Harper I that required the General Assembly to perform an RPV analysis before drawing any legislative districts was based on an inaccurate reading of Stephenson I [click through the link above to see why].


    Because the North Carolina Constitution does not require the General Assembly to conduct an RPV analysis before enacting a redistricting plan, Common Cause's arguments regarding the General Assembly's RPV analysis are inapposite. Plaintiffs essentially ask this Court to "impose a judicially-mandated preclearance requirement" where no such requirement exists in our constitution. If Common Cause believed that the General Assembly was incorrect that no VRA districts were required, it could have brought a claim under Section 2 of the VRA. Common Cause did not bring such a claim in this case. Accordingly, the holding in Harper I that required the General Assembly to undertake an RPV analysis is overruled, and the portion of the 11 January 2022 Judgment dismissing Common Cause's declaratory judgment claim with prejudice is affirmed.

    So, while progressive litigants may still pursue VRA cases in state court, they will no longer be able to claim that Stephenson v. Bartlett requires using racial data to conduct racially polarized voting analysis for drawing districts.

Do you consider Election Integrity an issue of some real importance, or just another conspiracy theory interfering with Democratic Socialist political hegemony?
  No, complete access to everyone voting, even in a willy nilly manner, is more important than getting it right by limiting access to those that would commit Voter Fraud.
  Yes, the most inalienable right of real citizens of this Democratic Republic is the Right to Vote, and that right shall remain sacrosanct for perpetuity.
  Again, I don't vote and I don't care.
730 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )


( March 21st, 2024 @ 10:56 pm )
That is true. I was there.

Offshore Wind Costs Are Getting Worse Institutionalized Corruption, Statewide, John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal Former NSA Employee Pleads Guilty After Trying To Sell Classified Information To Russia


Latest State and Federal

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) is looking into whether GoFundMe and Eventbrite cooperated with federal law enforcement during their investigation into the financial transactions of supporters of former President Donald Trump.
Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) was mocked online late on Monday after video of her yelling at pro-Palestinian activists went viral.
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro, along with hosts Matt Walsh, Andrew Klavan, and company co-founder Jeremy Boreing discussed the state of the 2024 presidential election before President Joe Biden gave his State of the Union address on Thursday.
Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said this week that the criminal trials against former President Donald Trump should happen before the upcoming elections.
Vice President Kamala Harris ignored recommendations while attorney general of California to investigate an alleged pyramid scheme at a company linked to her husband, according to documents obtained by The New York Post.
'The entire value add of Hunter Biden to our business was his family name and his access to his father, Vice President Joe Biden'
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Tuesday that he has selected Nicole Shanahan to be his vice presidential running mate as he continues to run as an Independent after dropping out of the Democratic Party’s presidential primary late last year.
The campaign for former President Donald Trump released a statement Saturday afternoon condemning the White House’s declaration of Easter Sunday as “Transgender Day of Visibility.”


Back to Top