Court Pauses Order Restricting Trump’s Speech About Federal Election Case | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Leif Le Mahieu.

    A gag order against former President Donald Trump related to his federal 2020 election case has been paused by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals after Trump filed an emergency request on Thursday saying the order violated his First Amendment rights.

    The court issued an administrative stay, saying that the decision was made to give the judges more time to hear Trump's arguments. The court said that the ruling "should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits."

    U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, had imposed the gag order on Trump Sunday night after Trump criticized former chief of staff Mark Meadows. Chutkan is overseeing special counsel Jack Smith's federal election case against Trump, who has denied any allegations of wrongdoing.

    In their request to pause the order on Thursday, lawyers for Trump said that "[n]o court in American history has imposed a gag order on a criminal defendant who is actively campaigning for public office - let alone the leading candidate for president of the United States."

    "The prosecution's request for a Gag Order bristles with hostility to President Trump's viewpoint and his relentless criticism of the government - including of the prosecution itself," the request said. "The Gag Order embodies this unconstitutional hostility to President Trump's viewpoint. It should be immediately stayed."

    In her decision to reimpose the gag order on Sunday, Chutkan claimed that Trump's First Amendment rights must be limited because of the ongoing trial.

    "As this court has explained, the First Amendment rights of participants in criminal proceedings must yield, when necessary, to the orderly administration of justice," she said, adding later, "And contrary to Defendant's argument, the right to a fair trial is not his alone, but belongs also to the government and the public."

    Chutkan issued a narrow gag order against Trump in October, restricting him from chastising prosecutors, court staff, and potential witnesses. The judge temporarily lifted the gag order at the request of Trump's lawyers while they pursued an appeal.


    Prosecutors soon urged her to reinstate the order, saying Trump went back to the sort of "targeting" it would prevent. As examples, the filing cited an "unmistakable and threatening message" on social media about Meadows possibly testifying in exchange for immunity against prosecution and comments he made about his former chief of staff to reporters in New York. Trump also called Smith "deranged."

    On Tuesday, the Trump team will have the opportunity to make their case against the gag order.

    Daniel Chaitin contributed to this report.

poll#175

Understanding that this fragile Republic of the self-governed is in a precarious space in our nation's vast history: What is your honor bound patriotic duty in helping to sustain the continuance of these United States of America?

  I will depend on my Democratic Socialist politicians to continue to march hard toward the Left to provide Diversity, Equity and Inclusion for all who think and do as they are told.

  I will defend the Constitution of the United States of America, and support all elected leaders who pledge to protect and insure the continued sovereignty of this Representative Republic.

  I am very concerned about maintaining my current life style without working. I was told that as long as I vote Democrat, I had nothing to worry about ... but now I worry.

296 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#204

After nearly 8 months of the United States House of Representatives' Oversight Committee hearings, House Speaker Mike Johnson is pursuing an Impeachment Inquiry into the strong allegations of Bribery, Influence Peddling, Money laundering and possible Treason regarding the Biden Family Shell Corporations' business dealings with foreign nations that are adversarial to our survival: Is it prudent and wise for the Republican controlled U.S. House to investigate this Democratic Socialist President?

  No, Democratics should never be investigated because they are so superior to their Republican counterparts, and care so much more.

  Yes, in a Constitutional Republic, bound by the Rule of Law, no one is above the law, and that law must be applied evenly.

  Not sure ... Now, what got all this started?

296 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#157

Was it a judicious ploy for Joe Biden's FBI to execute the unprecedented raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate?

  Yes; the Cheneys despise this former Republican president, and for good reason ... so they say.

  No; never has a former president been treated with this level of vindictive abuse by those temporarily in power.

  Who cares? It's Trump.

932 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?