Jack Smith suffers huge loss in the SCOTUS

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.88% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

1.12% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
89 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Published: Monday, December 25th, 2023 @ 4:59 pm
By: Beaufort Observer Editorial Team ( More Entries )

Login to Send a Private Message to Beaufort Observer Editorial Team

Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe joined Maria Bartiromo this morning on Sunday Morning Futures.

During their conversation John Ratcliffe had the opportunity to weigh in on Jack Smith’s rejection this week by the Supreme Court.

This was brutal. The hitman is exposed!

John Ratcliffe: Stating the obvious, this was a big legal victory for President Trump and a big legal setback for Jack Smith. But I would argue that Jack Smith lost more than just a legal issue at the Supreme Court. He lost credibility. This may be his Mueller moment.

Your viewers remember when Special Counsel Bob Mueller struggled and stumbled to find an answer and ultimately couldn’t answer why he applied a different standard to Donald Trump than anyone else ever prosecuted or under investigation by the Department of Justice, meaning that Donald Trump had to conclusively prove his innocence rather than have a presumption of innocence as our bedrock standard.

Bob Mueller lost all credibility and he and his report drifted away. And I would submit that this is the Bob Mueller moment for Jack Smith because everyone remembers, Maria, that he stood before the American people when he indicted Donald Trump. And he said, we have one set of laws and they apply equally to everyone. Donald Trump will be treated the same as every other defendant. But when Donald Trump’s legal team came forward with a legal defense of presidential immunity that threatened a trial date taking place before the political election in 2020, Jack Smith did a 180 and he went to the Supreme Court and said, forget everything I told you. Now. Donald Trump is completely different.

This is extraordinary. We have to have an expedited review. You have to look at this immediately. And I think the Supreme Court, the way they rejected this unanimously with one sentence saying petition denied, I think reflects that they saw this for what we all saw, which is that the very same Justice Department that, you know, took six years to consider charges against a guy named Biden saying this was plenty fast. But when it comes to a guy named Trump, for some reason, we have to have this trial take place before the election.

Keep in mind, Maria, keep in mind that the speedy trial provisions of the 6th amendment are the defendants right, not the government’s. I think that this was nakedly partisan and overtly political, and it was revealed, told to the Supreme Court. That’s how Jack Smith is operating.

Source: The Hitman Is Exposed!... Former DNI Ratcliffe: Jack Smith Lost More than a Legal Issue at Supreme Court - This May Be His Bob Mueller Moment (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL VIDEO.

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Comments

John Steed said:

( December 27th, 2023 @ 6:41 pm )

A two tier justice system with different standards for different people depending on their politics is NOT the Rule of Law. When the justice system can be weaponized against political opponents, as it now is in the US, there is no longer any real Rule of Law.

Death threats are wrong against any politician including those four Democrat political contributors wearing black robes in Colorado who abused power to make a political hatchet job ruling for election interference reasons. The proper response would be to seek to disbar them or prosecute them for election interference.

Big Bob said:

( December 27th, 2023 @ 11:36 am )

Back on planet Earth MAGA goes nuts threating the Colorado justices with violence and death. Voters should ask themselves, do they want that turned against them? If these guys win, it's open season on anyone who they deem unworthy. How long before they deem you unworthy? In the end, everyone is unworthy.

Isn't a stable government and the rule of law a better way to go?

Big Bob said:

( December 26th, 2023 @ 3:04 pm )

But that doesn't matter because the courts are "rigged" and the justices locked up and tried for treason. Some would say hanged.

Which is it?

"Carefully planned" US invasion, report says

Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics

Daily Wire Movie A Hit With Daily Wire Movie Critics, Reports Daily Wire On Daily Wire