Trump Explains NATO Stance After Negotiating Story Draws Controversy | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daniel Chaitin.

    On Monday, former President Donald Trump explained his stance on NATO after drawing controversy with a story about how he used hardball tactics to negotiate with other world leaders on supporting the alliance.

    A statement posted to Truth Social talked about how Trump, who is seeking a second term in the White House, argued how member nations contribute more to NATO's collective defense with a strong U.S. leader pushing them to meet the 2% minimum GDP defense investment guideline.

    "When I told the 20 Countries that weren't paying their fair share that they had to PAY UP, and said without doing that you will not have U.S. Military Protection, the money came rolling in," Trump said after an opening line claiming that his critics acknowledge how "STRONG" he made NATO.

    "After so many years of the United States picking up the tab, it was a beautiful sight to see. But now, without me there to say YOU MUST PAY, they are at it again. We are into helping Ukraine for more than 100 Billion Dollars more than NATO," he continued, alluding to U.S. support for Ukraine in its war against Russia.

    "We have nobody that they respect, and they insist on paying far less than we do. Wrong, NATO HAS TO EQUALIZE, AND NOW. THEY WILL DO THAT IF PROPERLY ASKED. IF NOT, AMERICA FIRST! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN," Trump said.

HbAD0

    The social media post came as Trump faced blowback after telling a story at an event in South Carolina on Saturday about how NATO was "busted" until he got allied countries to increase their defense spending under pressure to do more to assist the United States in propping up the collective.

    "One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, 'Well sir, if we don't pay and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?' I said, you didn't pay? You're delinquent? He said, 'Yes, let's say that happened.' No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay," Trump said.

    Some took Trump's comments as suggesting he would allow the United States to neglect its Article 5 duties and even take Russia's side in the event of an attack on a NATO ally.

    "The promise of NATO - that an attack on one is an attack on all - keeps American families safe," President Joe Biden, who is also seeking a second term in the 2024 election, said in a post to X. "It's that simple. Any individual who calls into question the durability of that vow is a danger to our security."

    Although data released last summer showed only one-third of NATO allies were on pace to reach their spending target, a White House spokesman argued the alliance is "more relevant" and "stronger" under Biden as the collective "is right at the forefront of that when it comes to the security environment on the continent of Europe."

    Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, Trump's last-remaining rival in the GOP primary contest who served as his ambassador to the United Nations, said on CBS, "The last thing we ever want to do is side with Russia."

    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg responded with a statement that said "any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk."

HbAD1

    Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who has endorsed Trump in the 2024 election, told CNN on Sunday that he had "zero concerns" about Trump's latest comments on NATO.

    "What he's basically saying is, if you see the comments, he said NATO was broke or busted until he took over because people weren't paying their dues. And then he told the story about how he used leverage to get people to step up to the plate and become more active in NATO," Rubio said.

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#209
In the minds of many, since January 20, 2021, the World has become far less safe in every theater of conflict, beginning with the attack of Israel by Iran /Hamas, so the question becomes: What caused this Worldwide calamity of extreme geopolitical dysfunction, and what will correct it?
  Joe Biden is the cause of this frightening Worldwide situation, and it will end when a Republican is elected president.
  This delayed Worldwide dysfunction and constant conflict is all Donald Trump's fault, as it is with everything that occurs going forward, and long before the man ever became the 45th president..
  Joe Biden is the "root cause" of this frightening Worldwide situation, and it will end when former President Donald John Trump is elected president.
  In the imitable words of Alfred E. Newman: "What, me worry?"
404 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#211
26 days after the October 7th Terror attacks on Israel, where over 1400 Jewish men, women and children were gruesomely murdered, and hundreds more made hostage: Should the Biden /Harris administration finally state that the administration's primary Middle East negotiating partner, Iran, is behind the funding and strategy of the aggressors, the Hamas Terrorists, or continue to take the more moderate position of "Don't," which is clearly not working?
  Yes, name Iran as the funding /strategy culprit, and begin to enforce the President Trump era sanctions to END Iran's ability to prosecute this war against Israel and the United States.
  No, Iran is a valuable partner in the motives of the Biden / Harris administration, and must not be named as the culprit and our enemy.
  I have larger concerns just to survive in this economy.
301 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#206
In stripping away the heavy varnish of fakery by the heavy handed Corrupt Corporate Media; in taking a true view of what is real, right now with clear open eyes: How do you see this 46th President of these States United; what is your visceral first impression of Joe Biden after nearly 3 years on the job?
  A good man, wise and kind
  The Socialist President
  A president in praise of his son
  The Non Patriot President
  A successful president
  The Idiot President
  A knowledgeable president
  A corrupt president
  A perfect leader of the Democratic Socialist party
  The man is married to a "Doctor"
578 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back
HbAD2

 
Back to Top