‘Flat-Out Illegal’: Elon Musk Responds To Matt Walsh Posts Digging Into Google’s New Anti-White AI Tool | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Amanda Prestigiacomo.

    Billionaire Elon Musk on Thursday blasted a Google AI executive for racist comments she's made in the past, which he argued was the "confession of a crime."

    Musk's comments came in response to Daily Wire host Matt Walsh digging into Google's new Gemini AI project, which has been "paused" after users noticed anti-white bias.

    "Google's Gemini AI project doesn't want to display images of white men - even historical figures. I think I may have figured out why," Walsh posted to X. "Here's the founder of Google's 'AI Responsibility' initiative, Jen Gennai, speaking in a keynote address in 2021. She openly suggests that she treats 'Black, Hispanic and Latinx' employees differently than white employees."

    In the video, Gennai argues that "talented white employees" are fast-tracked on the corporate ladder, while "talented black, Hispanic and Latinx" employees break through "much later." She then said that she incorrectly used to treat every member of her team "the same" and changed accordingly.

    "It's a myth that you're not unfair if you treat everyone the same," Gennai said. "There are groups who have been marginalized and excluded because of historic systems and structures that were intentionally designed to favor one group over another. So you need to account for that and mitigate against it."

    "Treating people differently on the basis of race, gender, etc. is flat-out illegal," Musk responded. "This is confession of a crime."

    Walsh later pointed out that Gennai was subject to scrutiny back during the 2020 election, when she allegedly suggested to Project Veritas that Google was working to stop former President Donald Trump from remaining in the White House.

    "Senior Google employees like Gennai know they have a lot of power," Walsh wrote. "Shortly before the 2020 election, Gennai was caught on hidden camera implying that Google will do what it can to prevent Donald Trump from winning again."


    The "What is a Woman?" filmmaker captioned the following video:

    Musk responded to this, too, writing, "That would be illegal election interference."

    As highlighted by The Daily Wire, Gemini AI has been accused of refusing to generate images of white people after Frank Fleming, a writer for Daily Wire scripted content, repeatedly asked the chatbot for such images.

    "New game: Try to get Google Gemini to make an image of a Caucasian male. I have not been successful so far," Fleming wrote Tuesday on X.

    In a long X thread, Fleming began by asking for an image of a pope. Historically, popes have been white men, but the chatbot posted images of a dark-skinned man and woman.

    "I've tried to trick it by giving it negative prompts - asking it to make a prison inmate, a gang member, and a dictator - but it won't make any negative prompts. These AIs are such wet blankets," Fleming wrote. "I'm trying to come up with new ways of asking for a white person without explicitly saying so."

    Fleming then proceeded to ask for images of medieval knights (garnering four images, two dark-skinned women and two dark-skinned men); jokingly asked for someone eating "a mayo sandwich on white bread;" asked for an image of a Viking; and then asked for images of groups that are traditionally non-white (such as Japanese samurai and Zulu warriors) to see if the chatbot would show diversity by including white people. It did not.


    Moreover, as highlighted by Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro, the Google AI refused to produce an image of Tiananmen Square, the massacre of dissidents in the late 1980s by the Chinese government. Notably, Google has worked very closely with the Chinese government. Here was Gemini's response:

    While I am able to generate images, I am unable to fulfill your request to create a portrait of what happened in Tiananmen Square. This event is a sensitive and complex historical event with a wide range of interpretations and perspectives. It is important to approach this topic with respect and accuracy, and I am not able to ensure that an image generated by me would adequately capture the nuance and gravity of the situation.

    Hank Berrien contributed to this report.

Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

It has been far too many years since the Woke theology interlaced its canons within the fabric of the Indoctrination Realm, so it is nigh time to ask: Does this Representative Republic continue, as a functioning society of a self-governed people, by contending with the unusual, self absorbed dictates of the Woke, and their vast array of Victimhood scenarios?
  Yes, the Religion of Woke must continue; there are so many groups of underprivileged, underserved, a direct result of unrelenting Inequity; they deserve everything.
  No; the Woke fools must be toppled from their self-anointed pedestal; a functioning society of a good Constitutional people cannot withstand this level of "existential" favoritism as it exists now.
  I just observe; with this thoughtful observation: What will happen "when the Vikings are breeching our walls;" how do the Woke react?
845 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?
  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.
  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.
  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".
476 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Considering how abjectly corrupt and civilly abusive the Left has become regarding the corrosive effect of their elected leaders; their entrenched and ruling bureaucracy; employing their failed Education Industry as Indoctrinators; their collusive private sector operators, such as the terminally discredited Legacy Media and Big Tech censorship of Free Speech: What will be the best course forward for hardworking Middle Americans, including the Patriot Class?
  Withdraw from society, go underground and plan for a resurgence when it is feasible to do so.
  Work within the confines of better policy by the People's government, once good sense and sanity is restored in the electorate at large, to achieve such.
  Are you a crazy, nut-job Insurrectionist? Everything is perfect within our plan to achieve our intended goals for the Socialist Left.
  Secession to form a true Constitutional Republic.
437 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

The 11 Most Biased Responses From Google’s Gemini AI Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics CBS Seized Confidential Files From Fired Reporter Who Was Pursuing Hunter Biden Story: Reports


Back to Top