‘F*** Your Objectivity’: Democrat Strategist Demands Media Give ‘Slanted Coverage’ Against Trump | Eastern NC Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daily Wire News.

    Democrat strategist James Carville raged against the legacy media this week, demanding that they take an even more biased approach when reporting on former President Donald Trump.

    Carville made the remarks after New York Times executive editor Joe Kahn said last month that the newspaper wants to be as fair as possible for the upcoming election and that the newspaper does not want to be "a propaganda arm for a single candidate."

    "People say Trump is going to be the Republican nominee and we got to cover it, and Biden's the Democratic nominee and we cover this. And if there's something bad about Biden, of course, we've got to print it," Carville said on Thursday. "But if something comes up that is, can't say good about Trump, but more favorable to him, like the Elie Honigs and the Fareed Zakarias of the world, that's one way to look at it. We just tell the truth and let the people decide. Or, at times when the country is in great peril or the moral imperative is so significant, you don't do that."

    "Now you have Joe Kahn, the new editor or publisher, whatever he is at The New York Times, saying, 'We're just going to cover this down the middle. We're going to cover what it is,'" he continued. "I don't think that's the role of the news media at a time when the entire Constitution is in peril. I don't have anything against slanted coverage. I really don't ... I would have something against it at most other times in American history, but not right now. F*** your objectivity. The real objectivity in this country right now is we're either going to have a Constitution or we're not."


    Carville ripped the media for reporting on the criminal charges that President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, is facing and the serious bias issues involving the judge who oversaw Trump's criminal trial in Manhattan.

    "I can't tell you that these are bad people. They're extremely naive people who have no idea what's at stake in this election," he said. "So I think we need slanted coverage, more slanted coverage, and I think we got to recognize the threat that this guy and the MAGA, not just him, the entire MAGA movement, from Alito and Trump on down is a serious, clear and present danger to the existence of the Constitution in the United States. And I mean that."

poll#201

Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?

  Yes

  No

  Not sure

508 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#215

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

  No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

  Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

  "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

172 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?