Comments for Nuclear Is Obviously Clean Energy | Eastern NC Now
Browse all Comments for Nuclear Is Obviously Clean Energy...
 |
The scope of the problem is that there is no problem from human produced CO2, except that the fools who fall for the globalist narrative of climate alarmism threaten our freedom and prosperity. As Dr. Vaclav Klaus, past president and former prime minister of the Czech Republic wrote "climate alarmism is a budding totalitarian ideology that is the greatest threat to freedom, democracy, and prosperity in the world today."
If you want to know why the globalist narrative on climate alarmism is so full of hot air, listen to the many prominant scientists with PhDs in televent fields who are interviewed in this British TV documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle": www.youtube.com Or read Dr. Klaus' book "Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What is in Jeopandy, Ckunate ir Freedom?" It has been published in eight languages and even you should undersand at least one of them, Bobbie.
Commented: Sunday, May 28th, 2023 @ 11:15 am
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
And still you haven idea the scope of the problem. Use those college degrees to calculate the emission rate. Just rambling.
Commented: Saturday, May 27th, 2023 @ 11:47 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Great point Steven!
Commented: Saturday, May 27th, 2023 @ 6:53 pm
By: Jann
|
|
The level of ignorance of the lemmings in the climate alarmist movement is astounding. Some years ago, I was walking down the street in London and encountered a global warming protest I had to make my way around. This was before the eco-loons started blocking major roads and streets and gluing themselves to things, but they still seemed to be true beleivers in a cult. There was a stage set up and a college age girl harranguing the rest of the mostly college age group from a microphone, As I made my way past, among the statements I heard her make were "we need to totally eliminate CO2" and "we need to end the greenhouse effect". Both of those crazy statements got cheers from those listening.
These eco-loons either knew nothing about science or they were opposed to life on Earth. CO2 is a necessary nutrient for plants and without it all plant life would die. Then how is animial life going to survive?. Additionally, the greenhouse effect is what keeps the Earth warm enough to sustain any life. I guess you can't fix crazy.
Commented: Saturday, May 27th, 2023 @ 8:23 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
You are the one without a clue, Bobbie, because all you do is regurgitate the far left narrative in your tunnel vision. You keep deflecting to things that are irrelevant. If you would watch that British TV documentary linked below you would understand the real science involved and how your narrative is nothing but hot air. Learn the relationship between our oceans and the CO2 in our atmosphere and you would grasp why the point you are trying to make is meaningless.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 10:52 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
Still not a clue. It's simple math. BTW lets not forget, we agree that nuclear energy is an option.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 8:06 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
If you had bothered to watch just the opening segment of the British TV documentary "The Great GLobal Warming Swindle" you would know from scientists that 1) the Earth has had as much as 30 times as much CO2 in its atmosphere as we have today, and 2) it did not impact the climate then and it will not today either. These are scientists who do not have their snouts in the pig trough of government grant money tied to promoting the global warming theory like the Climategate rogue secientists. It is easy enough to listen to the scientists who do not have a financial interest in promoting the unfounded manmade global warming theory.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 4:56 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
Still have no idea of the amount of CO2 we are talking about? How can come to a conclusion to a problem not knowing the scope of the problem? Guess that Hillsdale math isn't all its cracked up to be.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 3:42 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
What Big Government Bob conveniently ignores in his usual tunnel vision, or perhaps those who wrote the narrative he,she parrots deliberately left it out is the relationship betweeen the Earth's oceans and CO2. When the Earth in in one of its cooling periods, the oceans absorb large quentities of CO2 and when it is in a warming phase, the oceans release large quantities of CO2. They are by far the largest source of CO2 changes in the atmosphere. There is a lag time of decades from the start of a warming period before the oceans start releasing CO2 and a similar lag time of decades from the start of a cooling period before it starts absorbing CO2.
The current natural warming period started in the mid 19th century at the end of the preceding cooling period, called the Maunder Minimum or Little Ice Age. That would trigger the oceans starting to release CO2 in the early decades of the 20th century and continue to do so until decades after the next cooling cycle starts. Bobbie may want to junk the tunnel vision of his / her narrative and listen to prominent scientists explain it on the British TV documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle". Here is the link to that documentary which was broadcast nationally on the UK's Chaneel 4 and is packed full of scientific information from prominent scientists from around the world: www.youtube.com
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 2:13 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
I can do the math. Something CT is unable to do. You try it.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 11:48 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Maybe this will give you a path to look into.
rumble.com Listen to what is said and do a little digging for yourself.
Commented: Friday, May 26th, 2023 @ 7:16 am
By: Jann
|
|
Cant do it can you? You go on and on and have know idea the scope of the problem.
BTW 1980 CO2 concentration 339 ppm 2021 CO2 concentration 415 ppm. 20% increase. Until you can tell me how much CO2, in tons, is introduced daily into the atmosphere your taking points are completely meaningless...you can 't argue a point you know so little about.
Commented: Thursday, May 25th, 2023 @ 8:53 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Percentages are what matter, and if you listen to the prominent scientists interviewed in that British TV documentary, in the scheme of things, the percentage of CO2 from humans is insignifcant. Further, actual historical data refutes the argument that CO2 is a driver of warming or cooling. The overall percentage of CO2 in the atmoosphere starts rising decades AFTER a rise in climate termperature, and starts falling decades AFtER a decrease in climate temperature. Thus changes in levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are a RESULT of warming or cooling, NOT a cause of them. Watch the documentary. You might learn something.
Commented: Thursday, May 25th, 2023 @ 6:23 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
How can you post all this BS when you don't know the basic facts? Amazing.
Commented: Thursday, May 25th, 2023 @ 11:42 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Is that a no? Calculate it. Its easy. Let me know in tons, how much CO2 is added from human activity to the atmosphere each day.
Commented: Wednesday, May 24th, 2023 @ 11:10 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Our Government controls our weather more than everyday ordinary people. Look into "cloud seeding!" This weather modification has been going on for a long time. This just recently is coming out that it's no longer a conspiracy theory.
Our Government has been using this weather modification against other countries for control. Look into "Operation Popeye", this was active from 1967 to 1972. Now they are using it to get people to believe in Global Warming. Two Government studies were done in the 90's on the chemicals they use in the air for this weather control. It has been proven to harm plants, animals and yes humans.
Commented: Wednesday, May 24th, 2023 @ 10:18 pm
By: Jann
|
|
Any idea of how much CO2 human activity is adding to the atmosphere? Like per day or per year?
Commented: Wednesday, May 24th, 2023 @ 10:32 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
CO2 is a very small percentage of the atmosphere. Most of the CO2 going into the air is from natural processes, NOT from humans. There have been periods in Earth's history with a lot more CO2 in the atmosphere than today. More CO2 means better growing conditions for plants, including food crops.
Commented: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2023 @ 2:37 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
Its a complex issue. I dont think you or any one else has all the answers. The amount of CO2 going into the air from our activity is astronomical. To think there is no effect on the system is, foolish.
Commented: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2023 @ 10:10 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Hardly. Particularly as an undergraduate, I had more liberal professors than conservative ones. Of course, in those days, the environmental scare story du jure was global colling and the coming ice age. I remember the scaremongering on that on the first Earth Day.
Commented: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2023 @ 6:56 am
By: John Steed
|
|
Bob Jones University?
Commented: Tuesday, May 23rd, 2023 @ 12:33 am
By: Big Bob
|
|
Some of the prominent scientists who debunk the CO2 global warming theory are interviewed in that British TV documentary linked below. Given the political origin of the promotion of the CO2 global warming theory, the science behind it is primarily political science. The Climatefate emails show it to be manipulated "science". It is now a mainstay of the globalist moverment.
Partly answering your question, I personally have two university degrees, a bachelors degree and an advanced degree. from two different universities.
Commented: Monday, May 22nd, 2023 @ 5:54 pm
By: John Steed
|
|
JS, from what University did you graduate?
Commented: Monday, May 22nd, 2023 @ 3:30 pm
By: Big Bob
|
