Charlotte aims for rock bottom. | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: Brant Clifton uses the words of others, in part, to remind us just how different we all are in his "bare knuckles" Conservative online publication known as The Daily Haymaker.

    Just when I thought I had seen and heard it all. I never imagined a day would come when our elected officials would be seriously considering legislation allowing one to decide whether he or she is male or female. One of our major cities wants to mandate that your gender is not determined by nature, but by your personal preference - how you feel today.

    Charlotte City Council is preparing to vote on a sweeping anti-discrimination ordinance:

    Allowing transgender people to use the bathroom of their choice in restaurants, stores and other places of public accommodation divided the Charlotte City Council on Monday night.

    The city is considering expanding its existing nondiscrimination ordinance to include protections for people based on their sexual orientation, sexual identity or sexual expression, and familial or marital status.

    Much of the ordinance - such as adding gay and lesbian people to a group of protected classes - wasn't controversial. But the bathroom question provoked a sharp exchange between council members.

    At-large member Michael Barnes, a Democrat, said he was concerned about sending his children into public restrooms.

    "If I send one of my daughters into a public bathroom, and I see (a man) going into that bathroom, I am going to have some concern," Barnes said.

    His comment drew a rebuke from Al Austin, a fellow Democrat. Austin said it was deplorable that the city and nation was still debating civil rights, 50 years after the federal Civil Rights Act was passed.

    "Mr. Barnes, if you want to know about people being discriminated against because they are LGBT, it's a bad feeling going into a restaurant and being asked to turn around," Austin said.[...]


    Seriously ???? THIS is the most pressing issue facing Queen City leaders? They're going to try and override laws of nature? (Of course, passing this ordinance could give a new meaning to the nickname "Queen City.")

    The Billy Graham Evangelical Association has even weighed in:

    If a city ordinance is passed at the March 2 Charlotte City Council meeting, any biological male will be permitted to use a women's public restroom as the new policy would rank "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" higher than biological sex.

    Restrooms in both public and private business in Charlotte, North Carolina, would be required to adhere to the proposed transgender ordinance, which applies to restaurants, stores, bars, gas stations, parks, zoos, libraries, bowling alleys, theaters and many other public places.

    Men who simply identify themselves as women would be allowed to use any public women's bathroom-and vice versa-without any repercussions.

    "I cannot see why City Council would even consider this," Franklin Graham, president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association said. "It is not only ridiculous, it's unsafe.

    "Common sense tells us that this would open the door, literally, to all sorts of serious concerns including giving sexual predators access to children. It violates every sense of privacy and decency for people of both sexes, adults and children."[...]


    Franklin Graham's outspokenness on the proposed Muslim call to prayer at Duke made a huge difference in deep-sixing that plan.

    It's fascinating to see the folks on the left, alleged protectors of personal freedom, going all-out authoritarian on Charlotte's business community - telling them who they BETTER do business with. If this were merely about letting people do their own thing, while minding their own business, without being brutalized, that would be one thing.

    This is more about making a fundamental, permanent change to our culture and way of life. It's a full-frontal assault on deeply-held religious doctrine that goes back thousands of years.

    It's about forcing parents to have way-too-early, incredibly-awkward conversations with their preschoolers about the drag queens in the restroom. It's about establishing the supremacy of a certain political agenda, even if you have to rewrite the laws of nature, shred people's freedoms of association and religion, trample parents' rights to raise their children as they see fit, and deploy the government's iron fist to meddle in private businesses's in-house strategies and decisions.

    Today it's bathrooms and restaurants and stores and marriage. Next, it will be about threatening your church if it fails to " see the light" regarding the gay political agenda.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( February 22nd, 2015 @ 7:26 am )
 
www.gotquestions.org

Here is the biblical intersection with confused sexuality . . . It is a fact that the Bible was written from a non-scientific world view. Its writers view the earth as a 3-story entity --- water beneath / land / sky above. Anyone claiming the Bible is "without error" would never board a jet for travel. In fact, most early mariners believed if you sailed out of sight of land you could fall off into the abyss. Early Astronomers were threatened with burning at the stake if they persisted in their theory that the earth was a globe circling the sun.

It is not stupidity. It is just interpreting strange things from the man-centered-universe perspective. Early man believed we were the center and all else rotated around us on earth. Once astronomy and mathematics intersected with that view, it did not make sense nor prove itself to be true.

Sadly, some have never "gotten it." They insist on still being the center of the universe, as silly as that might sound to a person viewing Hubble pictures of space.
( February 22nd, 2015 @ 7:17 am )
 
If you had grown up in the rapid growth of Atlanta as I have, you would understand DIVERSITY. I don't understand all about gender orientation, but I have come to see it as a bell-shaped curve instead of an either/or of male or female.

The bell-shaped curve defines Normal from Abnormal. Those in the 60% majority are defined as "what we expect." Those in the ends comprise 40% split in two parts of the abnormal. 20% are extremes from the "normal."

When I took Statistics as part of my Psychology Major at Emory, it became plain to me. Any study of a drug, for example, shows it gets approved if the Majority are getting benefits from it. The extremes represent those "greatly helped" or "greatly harmed" by that drug. Even aspirin affects some people adversely. No drug if perfect.

If you apply that to sexuality, it explains gender orientation. The majority are clear about their orientation / the extreme 20% on each end are "gender confused." It is a combination of nature and nurture. The weird example is hermaphrodites---those who have BOTH genders mixed at impregnation. The baby is born with 2 sets of genitalia! Physicians seldom talk about this real anomaly. I ran into it doing research in the Emory Medical School Library and the Journal of Plastic Surgery.

en.wikipedia.org

The article above is accurate and puts a new light on sexual orientation. . .



NCGA: Common Core, coal ash commissions (and their price tags) Related to State, The Daily Haymaker Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics NCGA: No ID? Give them an absentee ballot and move on.


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges

HbAD1

 
Back to Top