Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?
98.88% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.
1.12% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.
Publisher's note: On the eve of the New Hampshire Primary, I run this one again, as Hilary B. Clinton is loathe to continuously play her skewed Democrat Feminist gender card to take down Socialist Bernie ... and it just is not working.
The election for the Republican and Democrat nominations for the United States President is now a wide open race.
The two front runners for their party's respective nominations both lost their bid in the Iowa Caucus, although the former New York Senator tried to claim victory (she still lost), before she literally bolted from the Hawkeye State. Republican front runner Donald Trump, Manhattan real estate developer, did at least lose (28% of the total vote to his 24%) to a hyper intelligent, and consistent Conservative Texas Senator, Ted Cruz. Hillary, instead, lost to a 74 year old Socialist, from a tiny New England state, who appears to spit when he talks.
What was secondarily important from the nation's first primary, via caucus, after Hillary B's disastrous showing, was that Florida Senator Marco Rubio ran a very close third to Donald Trump's second (23% of the total vote cast). Senator Rubio is young, whip-smart, and, like the boldly intelligently Senator Cruz, is of Hispanic descent from Cuban parents. Marco is now being called the 'Establishment's Candidate', but Marco is far more conservative than many political neophytes give him credit as being, and any RINOs moving their support to Rubio now as their last best hope of taking the Republican Party to a more moderate posture, will eventually get their feelings hurt, and hurt real hard.
Now back to Hillary, whose dwindling political persona born from her unnatural incapability of expressing truths while dealing with the reality of her public world; her natural plight of incessant lying should be the bane of the Democrat Party should Ms. Benghazi become their nominee. With the shroud of certain indictment, in a principled world, hanging over the growling, cackling pumpkin headed former secretary-of-state-for-sale, one must continue to remember that she is a Democrat, and the vast majority of elected Democrats are egregiously unprincipled people (I reference the Benghazi cover-up). That is the reality of it, so, she may well be their nominee. All she has to do to be such, along with Socialist Bernie, is to promise the low-information Democrats that she will continue to carve up America, at home abroad, and re-distribute to effect the Socialist Democrat ideal of keeping give-it-away Liberals in office.
Furthermore to currently accomplish this, the Democrats' president, Hussein Obama, is the most unprincipled man to occupy that high office in modern times, and a pretty fair liar himself. One need only watch how Hillary has promised the world, on the Democrat campaign trail, that she would unequivocally be Barack's third term if elected to know that she is pining hard for America's current Criminal-in-Chief to make the certain indictment to certainly melt away.
It has often been my first-hand experience to hear from establishment RINOs within the Republican Party that Republicans should be more like Democrats, and should coalesce around our rare politically wounded people, who are deeply principled challenged; however, unlike the Democrats, we help destroy them, and that is good. It is the patriotic duty of a wise electorate to expect principled behavior from our elected representatives. Remember Richard M. Nixon. That poor man was taken down hard, with the guiding help of Republicans, for far less than America's current Liar-in-Chief committed in his first term ... far, far less.
This could well be the nomination process to one of the most critical presidential elections in modern times: Principled Republicans seeking their party's nomination tear and one another to position themselves to lead the Executive Branch back from its deadly dark place, while Democrats struggle to protect Hillary B. Clinton's right to be America's first woman president.
But thoughtless ladies, and other low-information Liberals, I must ask: Do you really want to be responsible for putting this lying, unprincipled Bitch in the People's office ... all the People's office? You well may feel this way if you do not have one good patriotic bone in your body. Possibly, you are like Bernie when he pronounced: "(Socialist Democrat and unpatriotic) American people are sick of hearing about Hillary Clinton's damn emails."
For me, personally, I am not a Donald J. Trump fan. He was a Democrat, and acted like a rich unprincipled Democrat for far too long. But, if he is the Republican nominee, I will do my part to keep that lying Bitch, or the Socialist, who spits when he talks, out of this very important office at this very critical time.
I've known many people from in, and around New York City, plus I keep my eyes wide open, so I well understand Senator Cruz's slight within his discussion of "New York values"; however, if Donald J. Trump is the last Republican standing, and it is his version of "New York values" versus Hillary B's criminal version of "New York values" ... well then, count me in for that fight on The Donald's side. He will have my full endorsement.
If Donald J. Trump does not act in a principled and patriotic manner as the People's president, I will help take him down, and hard. That is the kind of Republican I am.
Considering that upwards of 100 FBI agents are working around the clock, discerning whether and how many unsecured emails were Top Secret, as well as the many other investigations into Hillary Clinton's possible illegal /criminal behavior as secretary of state; if a suggestion from the FBI that she be indicted goes unheaded by Obama's Democrat DOJ: Should someone be impeached by congress?