President Obama to Grant Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Aliens, Bypassing Congress Yet Again | Eastern North Carolina Now



    The Obama Administration is attempting to circumvent Congress and federal law by granting an Executive Branch "amnesty" through a DHS policy change which could take effect as early as June. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) division under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing a "provisional waiver for unlawful presence."

    In the March 30, 2012 press release, USCIS Proposes Process Change for Certain Waivers of Inadmissibility, USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas stated,

    "The law is designed to avoid extreme hardship to U.S. citizens, which is precisely what this proposed rule will more effectively achieve."

    This isn't a "law," it's the Obama Administration circumventing Congress and "the supreme law of the land" once again. Considering that since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly 100,000 Americans have died at the hands of illegal alien invaders, perhaps tracking the crimes committed against U.S. citizens by foreign nationals might be a better way to "avoid extreme hardship to U.S. citizens."

    Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states:

    "The United States shall guarantee to every State a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;" (Emphasis added.)

    "Shall protect" means "must protect."

    In the April 2, 2012 San Francisco Examiner article, Rick Oltman who works with both the Tea Party Immigration Coalition and FIRE Coalition writes:

    "Certainly taking criminal aliens off the streets, and there are a lot of them, is a good thing. But, it is a no-brainer. It is something that should be happening every day, all the time and doesn't even warrant an attaboy, because it is the federal policy of non-apprehension that has resulted in allowing over 30 million illegal aliens to enter our country over the past twenty-five years. Included in that number are millions of violent felons, child molesters, drunk drivers (Obama's Uncle being one) drug dealers, thieves and murderers." (Used by permission, read entire article here: "A deceitful diversion about immigration enforcement,")

    According to Joe Guzzardi, in a 2005 research article published at V-DARE, there are approximately "500,000 Anchor Babies A Year" born in the United States to parents who are not U.S. citizens. The misapplication of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause means Americans will eventually become a minority in the United States.

    No fewer than 5,000,000 "anchor babies" were born in the United States just since 9/11/2001.

    Under this new DHS/USCIS policy, if only "two family members" of a U.S. -born anchor baby are granted amnesty, that would put 10 million illegal alien invaders on a path to citizenship ahead of those already "in line" to come here legally.

    That is arguably equivalent to the 11.8 million illegal aliens many in Washington, D.C. claim is the entire illegal alien population. Add the illegal aliens that are "immediate relatives" of U.S. citizens that are not "anchor baby citizens," (natural born or naturalized), and the number of illegal aliens who could receive Executive Branch Amnesty balloons to possibly 15-20 million.

    Why Does the (USCIS) Propose It?

    Well, according to DHS' Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers: Questions & Answers:

    "Currently, immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who have accrued a certain period of unlawful presence in the United States are barred from returning to the United States for as long as 3 or 10 years if they leave the country." (Emphasis added.)

    TRANSLATION: Foreign nationals (regardless of whom they are related to) who have "accrued a certain period of unlawful presence in the United States" are ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    In order for "immediate relatives of U.S. citizens" (who happen to be foreign nationals) to be subjected to the 3-10 year prohibition on returning to the United States, they would in most cases have self-identified themselves in some fashion as having violated our laws, be it by overstaying or violating a visa, or by entering the United States illegally in the first place, and subsequently ordered to leave by an immigration court, or physically deported.

    If they came here legally or illegally, and left of their own volition without having contact with law enforcement, odds are the federal government would have no evidence they were even here in violation of our immigration laws, and therefore, would not be subjected to the 3-10 year prohibition on returning.

    So, the phraseology of "...if they leave the country." is intentionally sophisticated and deceptive language intended to imply some sort of innocence on the part of the foreign national. The penalty for being in the United States "illegally," including the prohibition against returning for a period that ranges from 3-10 years, is not an unreasonable oppression contained within our immigration laws. It is intended to act as a deterrent to foreign nationals entering or remaining in the United States unlawfully.

    This is no different than the deterrence effect of fines for speeding or a suspension of one's driver's license for driving under the influence, respectively.

    Why now? According to TPIC's Rick Oltman, (and I agree), "They need to divert attention from the following:

    1. Just last Friday the feds announced they were dropping thousands of deportation cases. They are examining over 300,000 cases, so you can be sure that at least a quarter million illegal aliens will be amnestied, because that is what they will get if they are not deported.
    2. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have just revealed that the agency only has enough space to hold approximately one in ten suspected illegal aliens that it processes, and the budget for detention is going to be reduced. It's catch and release.
    3. And, it's Club Fed for the illegal aliens they do detain.
    4. Also announced on Friday, The Obama administration is proposing to make it easier for illegal aliens who are family members of American citizens, and that includes anchor babies, to apply for legal permanent residency." (Read more here.)

    Public comments are open (and needed) until June 1, 2012 at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;dct=PS;rpp=25;po=0;D=USCIS-2012-0003. We spend billions of dollars borrowed from China to defend the borders of nations around the world; have funded and supplied U.S. troops to protect the border between North and South Korea for over half a century. If ICE Director Morton doesn't have money to protect America's borders and ports of entry, it's not his fault, but it is the fault of Congress and the President.

    Contact your Congressman and U.S. Senators. Demand they get their priorities straight. Demand they defund this "Executive Branch Amnesty," and put our troops on our borders.

    For God & Country,

    Jeff Lewis
      National Director, Patriot Coalition
      National Director, FIRE Coalition

      http://blog.patriotcoalition.com
      http://livestream.com/WRCG
      Email: Jeff@PatriotCoalition.com
      Phone: (252) 876-9489



Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Debra Goldman wins 6th District GOP Straw poll for State Auditor Patriot Coalition Update, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Is "conservative" a dirty word?

HbAD0

 
Back to Top