Biden Says Moving Forward With Barrett Nomination Before Election Day Is an ‘Abuse of Power’ | Eastern NC Now

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Eric Quintanar.

    During remarks on Sunday, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden accused Republicans of engaging in an "abuse of power" for moving forward to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg before election day, emphasizing that early voting has already started in some states.

    "U.S. Constitution provides one chance — one — for the Americans to have their voices heard on who serves a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court, who makes those big decisions about their healthcare, their civil rights, and much else," said Biden.

    "That chance is now. That moment is now. And the voters, in my view, are not gonna stand for this abuse of power. And if we're to call ourselves a Democracy, their voices must be heard," he added.

    President Donald Trump officially nominated Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48, to the Supreme Court on Saturday, kicking off a confirmation process that is expected to continue into late October, mere days before the election.

    Late last week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsay Graham (R-SC) said that he plans on having Barrett finished with the committee process by October 26, at which point Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) will establish how to proceed.

    During his Sunday speech, and in reference to the Supreme Court vacancy, Biden called on "every senator to take a step back from the brink, take off the blinders of politics," and "stand up to the Constitution you swore to uphold." He also said that just because "you have the power to do something," it "doesn't absolve you of your responsibility to do right by the American people."

    Democrats have accused McConnell of violating the precedent he used back in 2016 - when a vacancy was left on the Supreme Court by the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia — to avoid holding hearings for Obama Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

    McConnell has pointed out that the precedent wasn't about not holding Supreme Court hearings during an election year, but rather, not holding hearings during an election year when the president and the Senate, which is tasked with voting on the Supreme Court nominee, are of opposite parties during an election year.

    "In the last midterm election before Justice Scalia's death in 2016, Americans elected a Republican Senate majority because we pledged to check and balance the last days of a lame-duck president's second term. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president's Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year," said McConnell in a statement earlier this month.

    "By contrast, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary. Once again, we will keep our promise," the Republican Senate majority leader added.

    Should Barrett be successfully appointed to the Supreme Court, she will be the only sitting justice not to have a degree from either Harvard or Yale. She will also be nearly 35 years younger than the current oldest sitting justice, Stephen Breyer, who is 82 and has served on the court for over a quarter-century.

poll#123

Should President Trump perform his Constitutional duty and appoint a third Supreme Court Justice, or wait until it is suitable to the Democratic Socialists in congress and the media?

  Yes, Mr. Trump has the Constitutional duty to appoint a supreme court justice and the U.S. Senate is constitutionally sworn to "advise and consent".

  No, it is too close to the election of president, and the while Democratic Socialists do not have control of the U.S. Senate, they do have the control of the U.S. House and the media.

  I don't pay attention to these sorts of things.

134 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?