British Medical Journal slams Facebook ''fact check'' on Covid | Eastern NC Now

says entire Facebook "fact check" process is faulty

ENCNow

Facebook slapped one of its politicized "fact check" labels on a peer reviewed article in one of the world's oldest medical journals and its editors are livid.  The British Medical Journal has been published since 1840 by the British Medical Association. In November, it published a peer reviewed article pointing out serious flaws in Pfizer's testing of its Covid vaccine.  That led Facebook's "fact check" contractor Lead Stories to place a "misleading" label on the British Medical Journal article, meaning it could not be shared on Facebook.  The editors have published a letter they sent to Mark Zuckerburg calling Facebook out on its flawed "fact check" process.

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

Lead Stories has previously been revealed to be partly financed by Chinese interests.


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Poll: 60% of Brits oppose higher taxes for green agenda Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Judge reduces vax data release to 8 months


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD1

“Neville Singham has been a mechanism and funding arm of the Chinese Communist Party.”
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
wrongful stops and possible people tacking including cell phones

HbAD2


HbAD3

Voting is 100% voluntary - the cost is negligible, but the value is immeasurable!
Questionable finances, corruption and dictatorship round out another Executive Committee meeting.

HbAD4

 
 
Back to Top