Daily Wire And The Federalist Sue Biden State Department Over Censorship Effort | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Luke Rosiak.

    The Daily Wire, The Federalist, and the state of Texas joined on Tuesday in a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department, alleging that the government agency funded censorship technology designed to bankrupt domestic media outlets with disfavored political opinions.

    The State Department is tasked with foreign relations and has no authority over domestic affairs, yet it took a government office designed for countering foreign terrorist propaganda, the Global Engagement Center (GEC), and unleashed it against Americans engaged in what it claimed was "disinformation," according to the lawsuit, filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas on Tuesday night by the New Civil Liberties Alliance.

    It was "one of the most audacious, manipulative, secretive, and gravest abuses of power and infringements of First Amendment rights by the federal government in American history," said the suit, which also names Secretary of State Antony Blinken and five other officials as defendants.

    The lawsuit asks a judge to declare the State Department's attempt to interfere with domestic speech illegal and to permanently bar it from developing, promoting, or encouraging others to use technology to de-amplify, shadow ban, or restrict "the lawful speech of the American press and Americans."

    GEC was founded in 2011 as the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications and tasked with countering the propaganda of foreign terrorists like Al Qaeda. In 2016, it was renamed, but kept the same counterterrorism mission. Congress has made clear that "none of the funds authorized" for the entity "shall be used for purposes other than countering foreign propaganda."

    Nonetheless, GEC turned its focus on Americans, the complaint alleges, using taxpayer funds to finance the development and promotion of censorship organizations such as NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), which regularly target conservative media outlets such as The Daily Wire and The Federalist with the stated goal of limiting ad revenue.

HbAD0

    The New Civil Liberties Alliance's Mark Chenoweth, who is representing the outlets, said "the federal government cannot do indirectly what the First Amendment forbids it from doing directly."

    GDI's main product is a "Dynamic Exclusion List" of media outlets that it says present a "high risk for disinformation." It licenses the list to advertisers, who adopt it as a convenient way to avoid boycotts from the Left. That playbook was deployed last month against Elon Musk, when blue-chip advertisers were persuaded to stop advertising on the platform because the Left-wing Media Matters group claimed that big companies' ads occasionally appeared near objectionable content.

    GDI says it aims to destroy "the incentive to create [disinformation] for the purpose of garnering advertising revenues."

    GDI keeps its main blacklist secret, but publicly published its top 10 "riskiest" outlets, which was essentially a list of America's most prominent and mainstream conservative media publications, including both The Daily Wire and The Federalist, as well as the New York Post, and Reason Magazine.

    GDI "was funded and promoted by State Department Defendants," the lawsuit states. "State Department Defendants' active intervention in the news media market to make disfavored media unprofitable thus had devastating consequences to Media Plaintiffs."

    Also funded by the State Department is for-profit company called NewsGuard, which said it aimed to "cut off revenues to fake news sites" by coming up with a whitelist that purported to name every legitimate news site. NewsGuard ranks The Federalist as "unreliable" and The Daily Wire as "credible with significant exceptions."

HbAD1

    GEC funded GDI in 2021 through its U.S.-Paris Tech Challenge, in which GDI was awarded $100,000. The Washington Examiner reported that the State Department-funded National Endowment for Democracy apparently funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars more to GDI. The National Endowment for Democracy later acknowledged its "mandate is to work around the world and not in the United States," and thus would no longer fund GDI.

    The State Department also co-sponsored a "COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation" tech challenge that gave a prize to NewsGuard. NewsGuard said in a press release that it planned to "help" the State Department by flagging COVID "hoaxes."

    One of the "hoaxes" flagged by NewsGuard was that COVID might have come from a Chinese lab, a scenario now viewed by U.S. agencies to be likely. NewsGuard gave its secret data to scientists from Los Alamos, the lab that created the atomic bomb, who used it to target skeptics of then-conventional COVID wisdom.

    The lawsuit says that the government used tools developed to be used against foreign nations against political opponents at home.

    "State Department disinformation tools were developed... as tools of warfare... in the context of national security" and "foreign relations," then "misdirected to be used at home against domestic political opponents," it said.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton says he is "proud to lead the fight to save Americans' precious constitutional rights from Joe Biden's tyrannical federal government."

    "The State Department's mission to obliterate the First Amendment is completely un-American," Paxton said. "This agency will not get away with their illegal campaign to silence citizens and publications they disagree with."

    The lawsuit argues that Paxton's ability to enforce Texas' anti-censorship laws were infringed by the State Department's funding of censorship tools.

HbAD2

    "The Biden administration is illegally funding organizations with the stated goal of financially crippling media outlets whose coverage does not walk in lockstep with the government's ideological agenda," The Daily Wire said in a statement on the lawsuit. "We sued the Biden administration before over its unconstitutional vaccine mandate, and we won. This time, we're suing for our rights, all news organizations' rights, and the constitutional guarantee of a free press that all Americans deserve."

poll#176
Considering the renewed and unequalled dishonesty in elected politicians, at all levels of governing, and their associative nefarious bureaucrats doing their corrupt bidding: What is your opinion of YOUR government, and what do you intend to do about it?
  Today's overall government is just fine, and I will continue to vote for politicians that make promises to suit my individual needs.
  Today's overall government is poor, but I will continue to endeavor to learn what is true from the the most honest of media, and pick those representatives that best represent what is good and decent.
  I spend quite a bit of time on Eastern NC NOW; so ... I am having a far easier time separating the proverbial "wheat from the chaff" in finding honorable citizens to support.
151 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#128
Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?
  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.
  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.
  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".
476 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#206
In stripping away the heavy varnish of fakery by the heavy handed Corrupt Corporate Media; in taking a true view of what is real, right now with clear open eyes: How do you see this 46th President of these States United; what is your visceral first impression of Joe Biden after nearly 3 years on the job?
  A good man, wise and kind
  The Socialist President
  A president in praise of his son
  The Non Patriot President
  A successful president
  The Idiot President
  A knowledgeable president
  A corrupt president
  A perfect leader of the Democratic Socialist party
  The man is married to a "Doctor"
578 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back
HbAD3

 
Back to Top