ABC News whistleblower alleges collusion between network and Harris campaign on debate | Eastern North Carolina Now

sworn statement dated day BEFORE the debate

ENCNow

An ABC News whistleblower has revealed collusion between ABC News, its designated moderators, and the Kamala Harris campaign in the recent presidential debate.  In a sworn statement under penalty of perjury, notarized a day before the debate, the longtime ABC News employee revealed that ABC News has agreed to a series of secret demands from the Harris campaign, including questions that could not be asked and, that Trump would be "fact checked"  (challenged) but she would not.  The whistleblower says he has recordings that will substantiate his statements.

https://redstate.com/beccalower/2024/09/15/breaking-abc-whistleblower-says-harris-campaign-allegedly-restricted-the-scope-of-debate-questions-n2179354

Curiously, debate moderator Linsey Davis boasted to the Los Angeles Times shortly after the debate that the two moderators had prepared extensively to challenge Trump during the debate but not Harris.  This tracks with what the whistleblower has said.

The whistelblower also said that ABC News stated losing its objectivity soon after it was acquired by Disney


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( September 16th, 2024 @ 1:22 pm )
 
There have been studies going back decades showing heavy political bias in the major networks, so it makes no sense to depend on them to be controlling presidential debates if we want them to be fair and objective. With ABC News coverage this year, it has been 100% positive for Harris and 93% negative for Trump, so why should anyone expect any different in the debate? The problem with the Commission on Presidential Debates was that they always turned to these biased networks for debates.

We had a chance of something better when the RNC dumped the Commission on running the debates, but then failed to follow through and we ended up with something worse. The solution is negotiating debates openly. Realistically, finding knowledgable moderators who are both objective and unbiased is almost impossible in today's polarized society. The best solution is two moderators, one chosen by each side. The fact that a particular side chose a particular moderator will make it damaging if that moderator gets too one-sided and that would act as a safety valve.

The other option would be something like a modified Lincoln-Douglas debate, where half the questions came from each candidate. That way neither candidate gets protected by biased moderators from questions they do not want to have to answer. That worked fine for Lincoln and Douglas, so it should be fine for politicians today. Lincoln and Douglas had no moderators at all, but it may be wise to have one moderator who at least keeps time and turns microphones on and off appropriately but has no control over the substance of the debate.
Big Bob said:
( September 16th, 2024 @ 9:56 am )
 
Are you?
( September 16th, 2024 @ 9:51 am )
 
Is Little Bobbie banging Josh Stein?
Big Bob said:
( September 16th, 2024 @ 9:40 am )
 
Is Trump banging Laura Loomer?
( September 16th, 2024 @ 9:31 am )
 
Centuries ago that little witch Linsey Davis might have been burned at the stake. We don't do that any more. In these times, being "cancelled" is about the only solution to such fakers, but that is done by the far left, and they will not do it to their own. Probably the best solution is for the new Trump administration to freeze out this dishonest network by denying them press credentials for any press conference conducted by the new admininstration. Let them stew in their own juices for what they have done. PUnish the whole network, because the whole network was involved.



Biden-Harris no longer even asking asylum questions of migrants; just let them in Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Kamala’s DNC ‘Convention Bounce’ Evaporates In Latest NYTimes Poll


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

We don't recommend that you "just vote." We recommend you vote right.
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
It is time for a change. Continuing to re-elect the same people will give us the same poor results in our school system
Careful what you wish for. You might just get it
engineer is on the ground in western NC helping install SkyLink internet service

HbAD1

says four years of Biden-Harris have convinced him we need Trump back
"She’s trying to con the public like she did a good job at the border when, in fact, she has destroyed the very fabric of our Nation..."
no wonder FEMA has done such a poor job on relief from this hurricane.

HbAD2

Another case of "be careful what you wish for," you may just get it
This election comes down to what kind of government we want, capitalism or communism
Please remember them in your prayers and do what you can to help them

HbAD3

border czar is letting criminals into country, and not deporting them
would shut all ports on east coast and gulf coast - lead to shortages and price increases
Unbeknownst to Hezbollah, Israel had been secretly manufacturing the pagers that Hezbollah was buying for years.

HbAD4

 
Back to Top