Comments for 8 facts that debunk the manmade CO2 theory of global warming | Eastern North Carolina Now

Climate science has long known of the multi-century warming and cooling cycles the Earth goes through, and the last previous warming cycle, the Medieval Warm Period, was warmer than today for several hundred years. The biggest warm period, the Holocene Maximum, was much warmer than today for three thousand years. Northing bad happened to Earth in any of the previous warm periods. Indeed humanity suffered worse in the last cooling period, known as the Little Ice Age or the Maunder Minimum.

If one actually looked at how the greenhouse effect works, it is clear that the greenhouse effect is NOT involved in current warming. If the greenhouse effect went away, the Earth would be far too cold to sustain life. All of that is explained in that British TV documentary.

Like most far lefts types, you take a small piece of information and twist it into something you claimi in major but it is not.

Commented: Thursday, July 27th, 2023 @ 8:05 am By: Concerned Taxpayer

A physicist understands how all the processes involvee actually work, and can understand the fact that CO2 has never driven climate in the past and does not do so now. And the mad scientist in Sweden who invented the manmade CO2 global warming theory back in 1896 was, guest what?, a physicist. The theory had so little credibility that it was totally forgotten until someone dredged it up in 1981.

There are scientists expert on the climate and in fact who have attended the UN's climate chanage conferences who are interviewed in that British TV documentary who tear the manmade CO2 theory of global warming to shreds.

The climate alarmist scientists rely on the voodoo science of computer modelling. When one sets up a computer model, they can set it up to produce whatever range of results they want.

One of the sets of facts that disproves the manmade CO2 theory of global warming is the relationship between warming and the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. If CO2 caused warming, itcreases in it would precede warming, but it doesn't. Instead it does the opposite and lags substantially behind warming, meaning it is a RESULT of the warming, NOT a cause of it.

Commented: Wednesday, July 26th, 2023 @ 4:23 pm By: Concerned Taxpayer

It is a safe bet that the 2022 Nobel Prize winner in Physics knows a whole lot more about this climate controversy than a far left internet troll who is given to sweeping denials of whatever contradicts the leftwing political narrative.

Commented: Wednesday, July 26th, 2023 @ 10:02 am By: John Steed

"Stupid" may indeed be an apt term for those climate alarmist scientists who made all those outlandish claims that never came true, but given what was exposed in the Climategate emails, I think "deceptive" might be a more accurate term.

On the other hand, the scientists who exposed the lack of a sound basis for the global warming / climate change theory based on manmade CO2 are spot on.

Commented: Tuesday, July 25th, 2023 @ 10:05 pm By: John Steed

Has the cat got your tongue on this one, Little Bobbie??

Commented: Tuesday, July 25th, 2023 @ 10:13 am By: Concerned Taxpayer