The Human Touch Revealing All that is Real
Academic Center: Reform Licensing To Help People In Poverty Find Work And Opportunity
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Sanders, who is Director of Regulatory Studies for the John Locke Foundation.
Suppose there was an academic center focused on issues of poverty, work, and opportunity. Suppose this center pledged to "examine innovative and practical ideas" for moving people out of poverty. Suppose its leadership was interested not in raising their own profiles, but in honestly upholding the center's mission.
Would not such an academic center have produced a report like this one? It is by Stephen Slivinski, a senior research fellow at the Arizona State University Center for the Study of Economic Liberty.
Slivinski's report explores an innovative and practical idea: "How State Occupational Licensing Hinders Low-Income Entrepreneurship." He uses research findings to argue that entrepreneurship can be a ladder out of poverty for low-income individuals as well as a boon to low-income neighborhoods.
Here is an excerpt (with emphasis added):
What stands in the way is occupational licensing, especially in a state like North Carolina. Slivinski ranked N.C. tied for 13th highest among the states in percentage of low-income occupations licensed.
To address the problem of licensing, Slivinski proposed:
(Compare those to Recommendations 1 and 2 from the John Locke Foundation's Agenda 2014 entry on occupational licensing.)
Slivinski also cited earlier research by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Harvey S. Rosen, and Robert Weathers. They found that the positive effects of low-income entrepreneurship were even stronger in the long run for blacks than nonblacks. As they wrote,
Those positive effects and "double dividends" for the poor are prevented by state licensing schemes, especially in a heavily regulated state like North Carolina.
Because "lowering certification barriers to entry is likely one of the best ways to encourage more entrepreneurial endeavors among low-income households," Slivinksi concluded the following: "Reform of the existing occupational licensing regime is arguably the most important action [policymakers] can take."
Go Back
Suppose there was an academic center focused on issues of poverty, work, and opportunity. Suppose this center pledged to "examine innovative and practical ideas" for moving people out of poverty. Suppose its leadership was interested not in raising their own profiles, but in honestly upholding the center's mission.
Would not such an academic center have produced a report like this one? It is by Stephen Slivinski, a senior research fellow at the Arizona State University Center for the Study of Economic Liberty.
Slivinski's report explores an innovative and practical idea: "How State Occupational Licensing Hinders Low-Income Entrepreneurship." He uses research findings to argue that entrepreneurship can be a ladder out of poverty for low-income individuals as well as a boon to low-income neighborhoods.
Here is an excerpt (with emphasis added):
...one of the most important lessons from the past 20 years is how entrepreneurial activity offers an avenue out of poverty for many. As decades of studies show, entrepreneurs can be extremely effective in fostering local job creation and driving economic growth.
Such cases are often found in low-income areas and immigrant communities. As Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City economist Kelly Edmiston writes:
"Entrepreneurship may yield a double dividend in low and moderate income communities. Many of the retail and services establishments available in higher income areas, such as grocery stores, often are not available to low and moderate income people...[who also] face transportation challenges. Entrepreneurial activity not only provides income to the entrepreneurs and perhaps others in the community, but also provides needed goods and services."
Some studies have noted that large shares of entrepreneurs are centered in industries that rely on low-wage workers -- often the type of workers who find themselves below the poverty line, making those potential workers the most likely new hires for an entrepreneur....
It is for these classes of families that entrepreneurial endeavors are the most important. Evidence of how entrepreneurship can be a ladder out of poverty comes from the Aspen Institute. Researchers there conducted a five-year survey in the mid-1990s, following more than 1,500 low-income entrepreneurs across the nation. Close to three-fourths (72%) of those low-income entrepreneurs experienced an increase in their household income between $8,000 and $22,374. Their household assets increased by an average of more than $15,000 over five years. Perhaps most impressive, more than half (53%) had moved out of poverty in five years. Additionally, those who were on welfare before becoming entrepreneurs were able to generate enough income on their own that, on average, the amount of public assistance they accepted declined by 61 percent
Such cases are often found in low-income areas and immigrant communities. As Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City economist Kelly Edmiston writes:
"Entrepreneurship may yield a double dividend in low and moderate income communities. Many of the retail and services establishments available in higher income areas, such as grocery stores, often are not available to low and moderate income people...[who also] face transportation challenges. Entrepreneurial activity not only provides income to the entrepreneurs and perhaps others in the community, but also provides needed goods and services."
Some studies have noted that large shares of entrepreneurs are centered in industries that rely on low-wage workers -- often the type of workers who find themselves below the poverty line, making those potential workers the most likely new hires for an entrepreneur....
It is for these classes of families that entrepreneurial endeavors are the most important. Evidence of how entrepreneurship can be a ladder out of poverty comes from the Aspen Institute. Researchers there conducted a five-year survey in the mid-1990s, following more than 1,500 low-income entrepreneurs across the nation. Close to three-fourths (72%) of those low-income entrepreneurs experienced an increase in their household income between $8,000 and $22,374. Their household assets increased by an average of more than $15,000 over five years. Perhaps most impressive, more than half (53%) had moved out of poverty in five years. Additionally, those who were on welfare before becoming entrepreneurs were able to generate enough income on their own that, on average, the amount of public assistance they accepted declined by 61 percent
What stands in the way is occupational licensing, especially in a state like North Carolina. Slivinski ranked N.C. tied for 13th highest among the states in percentage of low-income occupations licensed.
To address the problem of licensing, Slivinski proposed:
- sunset reviews of occupational licenses
- shifting to voluntary private certification
(Compare those to Recommendations 1 and 2 from the John Locke Foundation's Agenda 2014 entry on occupational licensing.)
Slivinski also cited earlier research by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Harvey S. Rosen, and Robert Weathers. They found that the positive effects of low-income entrepreneurship were even stronger in the long run for blacks than nonblacks. As they wrote,
With respect to blacks, the most striking phenomenon is the difference between the short-term and long-term effects of experience with self-employment. In the short-term, the effects were often negative... However, when we look at longer term effects of experience with self-employment, the impact was generally positive and sometimes substantially so. Importantly, continuous experience with self-employment led to very large improvements for blacks who started toward the bottom of the earning distribution.
Those positive effects and "double dividends" for the poor are prevented by state licensing schemes, especially in a heavily regulated state like North Carolina.
Because "lowering certification barriers to entry is likely one of the best ways to encourage more entrepreneurial endeavors among low-income households," Slivinksi concluded the following: "Reform of the existing occupational licensing regime is arguably the most important action [policymakers] can take."
| ‘You Want What?’ | John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics | Bummed out over school calendars |
Latest Op-Ed & Politics
 |
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Published: Friday, April 19th, 2024 @ 12:33 pm
By: Daily Wire
|
 |
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
Published: Friday, April 19th, 2024 @ 10:58 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
Published: Friday, April 19th, 2024 @ 10:04 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Published: Friday, April 19th, 2024 @ 8:46 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
Published: Friday, April 19th, 2024 @ 8:26 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
|
 |
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Published: Thursday, April 18th, 2024 @ 8:10 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Published: Thursday, April 18th, 2024 @ 7:54 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
this is the propagandist mindset of MSM today
Published: Wednesday, April 17th, 2024 @ 3:04 pm
By: John Steed
|
 |
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Published: Wednesday, April 17th, 2024 @ 8:59 am
By: Daily Wire
|
 |
same insanity that created Covid
Published: Wednesday, April 17th, 2024 @ 8:58 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally
Published: Wednesday, April 17th, 2024 @ 7:23 am
By: John Steed
|
 |
Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history
|
Home
Contact
About
Service Rates
Privacy Policy
Follow on Facebook
Subscribe to Newsletters
Rss Feed
Keywords
Eastern NC Now & ENC NOW © Copyright 1998-2024 All Rights Reserved.
