NCGA Panel Taking Another Look at State Asset Sales | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Barry Smith, who is an associate editor for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

Program Evaluation Division initially identifies 17 government properties with no value to the state


    RALEIGH - A General Assembly subcommittee is looking at state property with an eye toward selling land and buildings the state owns but doesn't need, and seeing if it might save rent by moving from leased spaces to unused or underused state property.

    The subcommittee, a branch of the General Assembly's Program Evaluation Oversight Committee, already has begun looking at 49 state-owned properties, 17 of which have been found to be of no value to the state.

    "This is going to take a little time," said Sen. Rick Gunn, R-Alamance, who will chair the new subcommittee. "I don't mind the time aspect as long as we're moving this thing forward."

    Sens. Ben Clark, D-Hoke, and Shirley Randleman, R-Wilkes, will join Gunn on the committee, along with Reps. Becky Carney, D-Mecklenburg, Ted Davis, R-New Hanover, and Rena Turner, R-Iredell.

    The Program Evaluation Division recommended that the state sell 17 of the 49 properties; 12 of the 17 are within a few blocks of the Legislative Building in downtown Raleigh. Other properties are in Rose Hill, Wilmington, Statesville, Greensboro, and Garner.

    It would take about $18 million to bring the properties up to usable condition, according to the division's report.

    The division estimates that the state could garner one-time revenue of $14.3 million by disposing of the properties. In addition, local governments would collect an estimated $138,236 in annual tax proceeds once the properties are sold.

    Among findings in the report to the Program Evaluation Division are:

  • Along with the one-time money generated, disposing of unneeded real property and optimizing use of state-owned property is expected to save state taxpayers $2.6 million going forward.
  • North Carolina lacks a systematic process to identify surplus real property.
  • The Department of Administration does not control and manage the state's portfolio of real property effectively.
  • Discrepancies in the property database and insufficient access controls jeopardize the completeness, accuracy, and security of the state's inventory of real property.

    The report estimated that all of the property the state owns statewide could be valued at more than $27.5 billion.

    Many of the items contained in the report were readily identifiable pieces of property in the downtown Raleigh area.

    "We are confident this is a portion of the iceberg, we just don't know how big that iceberg is," said Sean Hamel, senior program evaluator with the Program Evaluation Division.

    The report notes that a "regular systematic review of state property could yield additional opportunities to dispose of or consolidate assets to reduce cost."

    Several of the houses identified near the downtown legislative complex are historic properties and would require renovations before they could be sold or repurposed. But most aren't.

    Much of the subcommittee's work on state property has yet to occur. Gunn said he expects his subcommittee to really get geared up after the General Assembly adjourns its regular 2015 session. Adjournment could be weeks away.

    The report also recommends that the General Assembly direct the Department of Administration, which oversees the Office of State Property, to allocate underused state-owned space to meet needs of expiring leases. It also suggests that state agencies look for current property that is not being used or is underused before seeking or renewing leases.

    This isn't the first time lawmakers have attempted to identify and sell off unused state property. The General Assembly had such an effort as recently as 2003. After some initial fanfare, it didn't gain a lot of traction.

    "There were probably four different studies of different magnitudes" of potential asset sales, Gunn said, adding that he is determined not to let the current effort go to waste.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Have you ever met someone who was weaned on a pickle? Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics To Bond Or Not To Bond


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Pope Francis lambasted leftist gender ideology during an address this week, warning that it presented an extreme danger to mankind.
amnesty would just encourage more illegal aliens to storm our borders
The Christmas candy was barely off the shelves when the Valentine’s candy appeared. Red and pink hearts with caramel and nut-filled chocolate goodness caught our eye. We are reminded of how we love love. Young love, especially.
far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it

HbAD1

America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.
An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition

HbAD2

most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration

HbAD3

 
Back to Top