Judicial Watch Files Suit After Secret Service Admits To Destroying Records Related To Alleged Biden Altercation With Secret Service Agent | Eastern NC Now

Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security

ENCNow
Press Release:

    Washington, DC — Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe Biden at a photo op in 2009 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:20-cv-02457)).

    The lawsuit was filed after the Secret Service failed to respond to a July 14, 2020 administrative appeal challenging its claim that all files related to the 2009 altercation, "ha[d] been destroyed," due to "retention standards."

    On March 29, 2020, the Gateway Pundit republished a 2017 report alleging that an unidentified Secret Service agent was suspended for a week in 2009 for "shoving Biden after he cupped his girlfriend's breast while the couple was taking a photo with him." "The situation got so heated ... that others had to step in to prevent the agent from hitting the then-Vice President," according to the report.

    Judicial Watch's FOIA request, made on May 12, 2020, sought:

  • All records related to a reported incident in 2009 in which a United States Secret Service Agent reportedly was involved in an altercation with, or attempted to strike, then Vice President Joe Biden during a photo opportunity.
  • The records sought shall include, but not be limited to, witness statements, the Agent's statement, victim's statement, alleged perpetrator's statement, incident reports, investigative reports, communications among USSS personnel regarding the incident, and disciplinary records related to the incident for the Agent in question.

    In a July 13, 2020 response to Judicial Watch's request, the Secret Service appeared to confirm that a file on the alleged incident existed at some point, asserting, "[T]here are no responsive records or documents pertaining to your request in our files," because "the above mentioned file(s) has been destroyed" due to "retention standards." The Secret Service added that, "[n]o additional information is available." It did not deny the incident had occurred. In its lawsuit, Judicial Watch intends to test the Secret Service's assertion that it destroyed all records about the incident.

    "We had not been able to confirm whether the report about the alleged altercation might be true until the Secret Service itself suggested it destroyed records about the incident," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Plenty of Focus on Teacher Pay but What About Police? Judicial Watch Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Experts Warn North Korea May Soon Unveil Missile That Can Reach U.S.


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD1

On Monday, US Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC11, was found in violation of the House Code of Official Conduct by the House Ethics Committee, regarding the prohibition of sexual harassment, resulting in calls for him to be censured.
The new program will teach students how to "become an influencer and strategic storyteller who thrives in the rapidly evolving creator economy."
Republicans have consistently backed the blue and new data shows President Trump's strong leadership has led to the fastest decline in violent crime in modern American history.
Sanctuary county for the unborn resolution to be presented by Stan Deatherage at tonight’s (Monday August 3) Beaufort County commissioner meeting.
Biden autopen pardon does not protect him against state prosecution

HbAD2

“Not getting that large sum of money ... was just the final death blow to the company.”

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top