Trump Asks SCOTUS To Intervene In Special Master Dispute With DOJ | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Tim Pearce.

Publisher's Note: This series of posts on this one issue - The Unprecedented FBI Raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago Estate - can all be found here on ENC NOW.

    Former President Donald Trump has taken his dispute with the Department of Justice over an August FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago to the Supreme Court.

    Trump requested the Supreme Court lift a federal appeals court's decision to bar a special master from reviewing purportedly classified documents confiscated from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI. A three-judge panel with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals partially reversed a federal judge's order last month granting the special master access to all materials confiscated in the raid.

    "The Eleventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to review, much less stay, an interlocutory order of the District Court providing for the Special Master to review materials seized from President Trump's home, including approximately 103 documents the Government contends bear classification markings. This application seeks to vacate only that portion of the Eleventh Circuit's Stay Order limiting the scope of the Special Master's review of the documents bearing classification markings," Trump's legal team said in a 296-page filing with the Supreme Court Tuesday.

    The former president's legal team also took shots at the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) over the raid and criminal investigation that stemmed out of a complaint from the National Archives.

    "[T]he Government has attempted to criminalize a document management dispute and now vehemently objects to a transparent process that provides much-needed oversight," the filing says. "The Government's attempt to shield the purportedly classified documents from the ambit of a Senior United States District Judge who served for seven years on the FISA Court, and preclude review by a former President of his own personal and Presidential records, illustrates precisely why the District Court found a special master was appropriate and necessary under the circumstances."

    U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon for the Southern District of Florida granted Trump's request for a special master to review the materials confiscated by the FBI in its August raid. Cannon, with the agreement of the DOJ, named Raymond Dearie, a senior U.S. district judge for the Eastern District of New York, to serve as the special master.

    Cannon barred the FBI from continuing to use the documents in its ongoing criminal investigation while the special master's review continued. Cannon gave Dearie until November 30 to complete the audit.

    The DOJ partially appealed Cannon's ruling, requesting access to about 100 documents that it says are classified and key to its investigation, as well as a federal audit of the national security risks associated with storing those documents at Mar-a-Lago. Cannon had ordered that the special master's review should not interfere with the national security review. The DOJ argued in a filing last month that its criminal investigation and the review, conducted by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, are inseparable.

    Trump's legal team has claimed that the former president declassified the documents in question before leaving the White House last year, though his legal team has yet to produce evidence of such an order.

poll#157
Was it a judicious ploy for Joe Biden's FBI to execute the unprecedented raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate?
  Yes; the Cheneys despise this former Republican president, and for good reason ... so they say.
  No; never has a former president been treated with this level of vindictive abuse by those temporarily in power.
  Who cares? It's Trump.
932 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#154
Inarguably, the policies of the Democrats in congress and Joe Biden as the Executive is plunging the United States into a recession, if we are not already there; a recession that was completely avoidable. Will abrupt changes in policies occur in time?
  Yes, the Democrats have a bold plan, yet to be revealed, to save us.
  No, there will have to be a complete undoing of the damage done by these Democrats.
  I can't do simple math, so how am I to understand the concept of basic economics.
1,216 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.

HbAD1

Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.

HbAD2

Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do

HbAD3

 
Back to Top