Two Questions About Election Reforms in the House Budget | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Andy Jackson.

    The 415-page 2023 North Carolina House budget includes a two-page section on election reforms (PART XXVI, starting on page 345). It includes five reform proposals.

    Budgets have become vehicles for pushing policies that have little connection with state spending. The John Locke Foundation's Brian Balfour pointed out that not everything in budget bills is about budgeting, and that is not good:

    Including policy not authorizing the expenditure of state funds distorts the true purpose of the state budget and reduces government transparency and accountability.

    Such policies deserve their own stand-alone bills to ensure robust debate on their own merits, not as a provision tucked into a 400-page budget bill.


    With that in mind, I will grade the five election reform proposals on two factors: is it good policy, and does it belong in the budget? The answer to the latter question will use the "Balfour test:" does it authorize the expenditure of state funds or other funds under state control?

    1. SBE/USE OF HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT (HAVA) FUNDS

    This section directs the North Carolina State Board of Elections (SBE) to use funds from the federal government to maintain and update voter lists, perform record-keeping in compliance with federal law, and retain or hire up to 15 people for those purposes.

  • Is it good policy? Yes.
  • Does it belong in the budget? Yes.

    2. SBE/POST-ELECTION AUDIT REPORT

    I have noted the need for reforms in election audits (pages 143-153). This reform does not do that, but it does require the SBE to provide more audit information than is currently required, a welcome increase in transparency.

  • Is it good policy? Yes.
  • Does it belong in the budget? No.

    3. SBE/PROHIBIT ERIC MEMBERSHIP

    The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) helps states clean their voter rolls by sharing data on registered voters who have moved to new states. The General Assembly provided funding for the SBE to join ERIC as part of the 2022 budget. Since then, it has become clear that ERIC will not institute reforms to protect data privacy and fix other deficiencies.

    This budget would repeal funding for the SBE to join ERIC.

  • Is it good policy? Sadly, yes.
  • Does it belong in the budget? Yes.

    4. SBE/FUNDS FOR VOTER ID

    There is a chance that the North Carolina Supreme Court will reinstate voter ID this year. If that happens, this budget section will provide $3,500,000 to implement voter ID. The money will return to the general fund if the voter ID is not reinstated.

  • Is it good policy? yes.
  • Does it belong in the budget? Yes.

    5. PROHIBIT PRIVATE MONETARY DONATIONS IN ELECTIONS

    This section would prohibit the SBE and county boards of elections from receiving private funding (so-called "Zuck Bucks). The ban is good policy because private groups should not have the power of the purse over those administrating elections. Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed a Zuck Bucks ban in 2021. While this section deals with a budgetary issue, it does not include an outlay of funds, and so fails the Balfour test.

  • Is it good policy? yes.
  • Does it belong in the budget? No.

    While all five election proposals in the House budget are good policies, only three belong in the budget. The other two should be in standalone bills. With Republicans' newfound supermajority, they should be confident enough to put them in their own bills.

poll#147
Do you consider Election Integrity an issue of some real importance, or just another conspiracy theory interfering with Democratic Socialist political hegemony?
  No, complete access to everyone voting, even in a willy nilly manner, is more important than getting it right by limiting access to those that would commit Voter Fraud.
  Yes, the most inalienable right of real citizens of this Democratic Republic is the Right to Vote, and that right shall remain sacrosanct for perpetuity.
  Again, I don't vote and I don't care.
730 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




N.C. House Budget Would Increase K-12 Spending, Raise Teacher Pay, and Expand School Choice Statewide, John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal What N.C.’s “REACH” Act Gets Right


HbAD0

Latest State and Federal

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) is looking into whether GoFundMe and Eventbrite cooperated with federal law enforcement during their investigation into the financial transactions of supporters of former President Donald Trump.
Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) was mocked online late on Monday after video of her yelling at pro-Palestinian activists went viral.
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro, along with hosts Matt Walsh, Andrew Klavan, and company co-founder Jeremy Boreing discussed the state of the 2024 presidential election before President Joe Biden gave his State of the Union address on Thursday.
Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said this week that the criminal trials against former President Donald Trump should happen before the upcoming elections.
Vice President Kamala Harris ignored recommendations while attorney general of California to investigate an alleged pyramid scheme at a company linked to her husband, according to documents obtained by The New York Post.
'The entire value add of Hunter Biden to our business was his family name and his access to his father, Vice President Joe Biden'

HbAD1

 
Back to Top