Supreme Court Will Hear J6 Dispute That Could ‘Undo’ Hundreds Of Cases, Impact Trump | Eastern NC Now

“The amazing thing is if you look at the way the government is portraying the statute, you kind of wonder why it hasn't been applied before."

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Amanda Prestigiacomo.

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a monumental case on a federal obstruction law that could potentially "undo" hundreds of January 6 cases and directly impact Special Council Jack Smith's case against former President Donald Trump.

    The case concerns a specific provision of 18 U.S. Code 1512, an obstruction law, which states, "whoever corruptly otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both." The court will examine how the Biden Department of Justice has been using the provision, possibly in context with that broader statute, to prosecute J6 defendants.

    Tom Caso, Senior Legal Fellow at the Claremont Institute, told The Daily Wire the government's application of the provision in this way is largely unprecedented.

    "The amazing thing is if you look at the way the government is portraying the statute, you kind of wonder why it hasn't been applied before," Caso said. "I think about all of the antics of the protesters at Supreme court nomination approvals before Congress - you know, the Code Pink folks and whoever else stands up and shouts during that testimony. Why have they never been prosecuted under this statute? They are obviously trying to impede an official proceeding."

    "It's kind of strange that the statute is only now been discovered," he said. "It's been on the books for quite some time. ... It was part of the Dodd-Frank legislation [and] it's never been applied in this particular manner before."

    The obstruction law has been used by the DOJ against more than 300 J6 defendants thus far, and notably holds a punishment of up to 20 years behind bars. It's also one of the charges President Trump is facing in a trial currently scheduled for March.

    If the Supreme Court agrees that the law has been misapplied by the DOJ, effectively siding with the defendants, the ruling could "undo a whole bunch of cases," says J6 defense attorney Kira Anne West. Moreover, it could adjust the sentences of those who've already been sentenced.

HbAD0

    Such a ruling could also potentially slow down Smith's prosecution of Trump. Notably, Smith is trying to prosecute the former president before the 2024 election, while Trump is working to delay the trial.

    "Since this statute is key to Jack Smith's prosecution, and the Supreme Court ruling on this case is not likely to come out until the end of June, that could hold up the prosecution or the trial until after the Supreme court rules," Caso told The Daily Wire. "That's going to be in the hands of the district court judge."

    Caso added that it's unclear which way the Supreme Court will go on the issue. The Court doesn't usually interpret a small provision to "wipe out" the rest of the language of a statute, he said, but, on the other hand, the court could read the provision in isolation and uphold the government's position.



poll#165
In light of continued developments, primarily since 2008, there exists in these United States a Legal System which operates on a proved Two Tiered approach to justice rendered, which primarily benefits Democratic Elites and Woke Ideological Virtue Signalers, representing their co-dependent wards, to the expressed exclusion of normal hardworking American citizens: What is your suggestion in remedying this widespread injustice and, if not corrected, its existential outcome for our Constitutional Republic?
  Complete overhaul of the Department of Justice and their enforcers - the FBI - to reflect a far more honest justice system to keep patriots remaining calm.
  Disband the FBI, and request that congress investigate all unethical and non patriotic practices to partially right the wrongs of a distrusted and politically weaponized "Department of Justice."
  Continue with the current system since the two tiered justice system has been so remarkably beneficial to Democratic Socialist political hegemony; chronic distrust in institutions notwithstanding.
676 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD1

Latest State and Federal

The teachers union is pushing to cancel school on May 1 as Chicago public schools continue to report dismal student proficiency rates.
With a new roadside plaque unveiled in Ellerbe on April 23, legendary wrestler and local resident André René Roussimoff is finally getting the formal recognition fans believe he deserves.
Cheryl Hines. Dennis Quaid. Nicki Minaj. All became associated with the Trump administration. What happened next?
Two years ago, new media brought President Trump back to the White House. What happened?
Victims’ advocates, prosecutors, law enforcement officials, and families impacted by violent crime gathered Tuesday at the North Carolina State Archives building in Raleigh to recognize National Crime Victims’ Rights Week and honor those affected by crime across North Carolina.
The POLITICO poll found that almost half of respondents think Hollywood players should "be less vocal with their political beliefs."
"They help cultivate a radical hate America agenda, and we can't afford that same toxic ideology in America's War Department.”

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top