Our Community Platform providing Essential Information to Know what is Real
Biden lies about border
Biden claims "the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican friends."
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) February 6, 2024
REMINDER: Biden spent his first 100 days reversing Trump-era border security, including halting the border wall, ending "Remain in Mexico," and lifting the border emergency. pic.twitter.com/M9UvSpe6PU
Republican National Committee Research
@RNCResearch
Biden claims "the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican friends." REMINDER: Biden spent his first 100 days reversing Trump-era border security, including halting the border wall, ending "Remain in Mexico," and lifting the border emergency.
https://t.co/M9UvSpe6PU" / X (twitter.com)
Comments
|
Stan Deatherage said:
( February 8th, 2024 @ 9:07 pm )
If the Idiot President's lips are moving, he is lying.
|
|
This statement by the President of the United States is astonishing.
 My friends in Texas and southern Arizona tell a different tale.
|
|
|
The Lankford bill was much worse than nothing. It legalized one of Biden's most brazen illegal methods of bringing in illegal aliens for the profit of the Mexican criminal cartels, the "parole pipeline". That brought in 1.1 million illegal aliens last year. It also did a lot to create more incentives for illegal aliens to enter the country like the automatic work permits.
When Trump wins, all he has to do is revoke the 64 Biden executive orders that, in effect, suspended and cancelled our duly adopted immigration laws. Trump has most of the tools he needs by simply enforcing existing immigration statutes, something that scoflaw Biden refuses to do. Now that we are prosecuting presidents, Biden and his underlings ought to be prosecuted for that. Lankfard has been a weak sister on illegal immigration for years. A few weeks ago, he made the asinine statement that he "loved all immigrants, legal and illegal equally". I guess he also likes all who sell drugs, whether in a pharmacy or on the street corner equally. Your knowledge of this subject or lack there of, is shown, Bobbie by your repeated reference to "the boarder" (actually it is "the border") and to Lankford as a representative when he is, in fact, a senator. Lankford was first elected as a Tea Party guy to the House, but went native inside the Washington beltway years ago and became an establishment swamp dude on a variety of issues some time ago. Even if he had stayed Tea Party, Tea Party has always been a different breed of cat than MAGA. |
|
|
Rep. Lankford hopefully, learned a good lesson. He was about as MAGA as one can get. Until they ate him alive.
MAGA - at some point, turns on everybody. Support that at your own risk |
|
|
Fair enough. But now you have nothing. If JB wins, you have 4 more years of nothing. If thats what you want fine. But you really shouldn't complain about it. Nobody gets everything.
I might add, even if trump wins, you won't get much more than this. |
|
|
Bolsnevik Bob with his MAGA obsession knows nothing about the divisions in the Republican Party which go way back. When I was growing up, what are now called "establishment Republicans", RINOs, or "Special Interest Republicans" were called "Rockefeller Republicans". In those days, we even had the "Battle Hymn of the Republicans" to the tune of "Rock of Ages" which began "Rockefellers not for me, he is not for GOP. . ." In the Obama era, they were called "Obama Republicans" so in our time it would be fitting to call McConnell and his crowd "Biden Republicans".
Reagan had nearly as much problem with these sellouts as Trump but it gets really bad with a Democrat in the presidency. On the state level we have been plagued by what are, in effect, Cooper Republicans like Phil Berger and Tim Moore. Senator Mike Lee is onto something in trying to kick out McConnell, who betrayed us often under both Obama and Biden, and on many issues, not just immigration. I hope Lee keeps going with that effort. Also the Oklahoma GOP withdrawing its support from that turncoat special interest goober Lankford needs to continue. |
|
|
Where to begin with Little Bobbie's whitewash?
What good is mandating employers to check immigration status? Lankford's folly would have granted withspread automatic work permits to illegal aliens. Besides, its already supposedly "mandated" but how much good is that doing? Those automatic work permits would have just encouraged more migrants to flood into the US. "narrow executive branch parole authority"? The Biden regime is illegally using it now to let 1.1 million illegal aliens into the country last year. It needed to be ended totally, but instead was being codified into law and allowing at least 5,000 illegal aliens a day to come in under it (and some read the bill at 8,500). That would be over 1.5 million a year (or over 2 million a year) Border wall construction? This is nothing but an illusion in the bill that was extremely limited and not the tall bollards of the Trump wall but something lower and easier to climb the very limited places it would be put. "Safeguards for "migrant children"? "Unaccompanied minors" are one of the most corrupt rackets in the current immigration scheme and procedures here need to be severely tightened up, not "safeguarded". America does almost nothing to verify age of those who claim to be children. European countries that have taken steps to verify age have found over half of those claiming to be children were really adults lying about their age and in Norway it was am astounding 90% of "unaccompanied minors" who were really adults. The extremely violent MS13 criminal gang from El Salvador has been using this "unaccompanied minor" loophole to import their thugs into the US. "Limit asylum in the US"? - If it effectively did that, it would be huge but it doesn't. There are both limits and expansions of asylum in the bill. The most important limitation on asylum as imposed by some European countries is that if a migrant is already in a safe country, they are not entitled to asylum in another country. Mexico is deemed a safe country, so this really needs to be imposed here, but of course it is not in this worse than worthless bill. Criminalize overstaying a legal visa? It is already criminal, but just not enforced. Since the Mayorkas Mafia is not enforcing most of our immigration laws, who in their right mind would expect them to start enforcing anything new here? This bill is a total fraud that was intended primarily to codify and legalize Biden's illegal "parole pathway" with a little window dressing thrown in and lots of money to spread the migrants around the country. The term "Invasion Authorization Act" coined by opponents is far more apt for it than the official one used by Biden. |
|
|
S\The SEcure Border Act 2023
Would have re-started boarder wall construction. Limit asylum in the US Keep safeguards for migrant children Narrow executive branch parol power Criminalize overstaying a legal visa Mandate employers to actually check immigration status Nowhere in the bill would it allow old white people to shoot migrants as they cross the boarder, but hey you have to compromise. |
|
|
I would say the Republican Party split. Republicans split and MAGA claimed many of its members.Neither group likes the other and wont agree on anything.
|
|
|
The problem, Little Bobbie, is that the Lankford bill neither "solved" anything nor was it a "compromise". It codifies some of the worst illegal things Biden is doing, creates more incentives for illegals to come, and does nothing to stop them. Anything that looks otherwise is only a smokescreen.
The problem for the GOP is that we have a Fifth Column traitor named Mitch McConnell in our midst who is in bed with the special interests who want more illegal immigration, and he sent a like minded fool, Lankford, to do a sellout deal with the Democrats. If he had sent someone genuinely committed to border security like Ted Cruz, they would have never signed off on such a one sided betrayal of the American people. |
|
|
So Big Bob: What provision of that ill fated bill do you believe to be the most beneficial?
|
|
|
My point is you are looking at 5 more years of nothing regarding an issue you care about. Given half the country is a lot like me, you will have to compromise. I suppose you can hold out for better terms but at some point everybody has to give.
In addition, it's an election year and it has been effective wedge against the democrats. So maybe thats more important than solving a real problem. Maybe thats why my side sees your passion for cruelty as disingenuous. Only thing left to do is roll the dice. |
View All Comments| Biden's War on Free Speech - Biden White House pressured Amazon on books | Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics | Raleigh political boss Berger tries to muscle in on our state senate seat |
Home
Contact
About
Service Rates
Privacy Policy
Follow on Facebook
Subscribe to Newsletters
Rss Feed
Keywords
Eastern NC Now & ENC NOW © Copyright 1998-2024 All Rights Reserved.
