N.C. Universities Survive Recession-Era Cuts | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jenna Ashley Robinson, who is director of outreach at the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy and a contributor to the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

UNC campuses focused on instruction, student support


    RALEIGH     A new report from the Center for American Progress claims that the "Great Recession" devastated public university investments nationwide. Specifically, it says that over a five-year period, tuition has skyrocketed, states have withdrawn public investment, and low-income families have been pushed out of higher education.

    Maybe so. But how does the UNC system stack up against public universities around the country in terms of spending and student success?

    Let's look at some particulars:

    Allegation No. 1: College costs have skyrocketed.

    The total price for in-state students living on campus in 2013-14 at the average UNC institution was $18,820. The average for all U.S. public universities was $21,473. And North Carolina's public universities cost less than those in our neighbors to the north and douth. The average price in Virginia was $24,135 this year. In South Carolina it was $24,073.

    From 2007-08 to 2011-12, in-state undergraduate tuition and fees at the average UNC institution increased $1,222. Nationally, tuition and fees at public universities increased $1,600 on average.

    Allegation No. 2: States have withdrawn public investment from universities.

    One of the reasons for UNC's relative affordability is that the North Carolina General Assembly has been generous to its universities. According to Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System at the National Center for Education Statistics, state appropriations make up 43 percent of UNC's core revenues. At the average American public university, state appropriations only make up 28 percent of revenues. As a result, tuition represents a smaller percentage of the total revenues at the UNC schools — 22 percent. Nationally, tuition accounts for 30 percent of revenues.

    The Center for American Progress' report shows that North Carolina's recession-fueled cuts to state spending on higher education have been moderate in comparison to the rest of the country.

    Measured as a percentage of revenue, North Carolina's cuts were the 15th smallest in the nation — just $677 from 2007 to 2012. North Carolina's tuition increase was the 21st smallest in the country. North Carolina outperformed its neighboring states on every financial measure.

    And there's evidence that campuses allocated budget cuts in a productive way. Across the system, 535 vacant positions were eliminated in 2012-13, effectively erasing what some view as slush funds (funds that come when campuses keep jobs unfilled but continue receiving appropriations for them). And schools in the UNC system spend a larger percentage of their budgets on instruction (and less on support services) now than they did at the beginning of the recession.

    Allegation No. 3: Cuts have hurt low-income students most.

    It's true that net college costs (i.e., the total cost of college minus any grants or scholarships) during the recession rose most, as a percentage, for students with incomes of less than $30,000 per year, even here in North Carolina.

    But North Carolina's public universities remain relatively affordable. The average UNC system student with an income of less than $30,000 paid just $6,511 in net costs in 2011-12. By contrast, students with family income greater than $110,000 paid more than double that amount — $15,634. The $6,511 figure is not all that different from the cost of living at home without attending school.

    At the average U.S. public institution, net costs are much higher — $9,300 for students from families making $30,000 or less and $16,920 for students from families making $110,000 or more.

Success, not just access

    But ultimately, student access to universities is only half the picture. In order to make real comparisons, we need to know whether students succeed once they're admitted to college. It's important to know whether cuts have hurt UNC students' success rates, and how UNC schools compare nationally.

    The six-year graduation rate for the UNC system is 59 percent, well above the average graduation rate for American public universities as a whole — 53 percent. UNC's better showing can't be explained by higher spending because UNC schools spend less per student than the average public institution once all sources of revenue are included — $22,578 compared to $26,702.

    What might be making the difference is that UNC schools are devoting a larger portion of that spending to instruction and institutional support than do other schools. In fact, as the university experienced cuts during the recession, that proportion went up, suggesting that the cost-cutting was focused on administration more than faculty.

    The cuts don't seem to have affected student performance. Graduation rates are up at almost all UNC schools since 2007-08. And this is even as total education-and-related spending per degree has decreased.

    UNC system schools appear to have bucked the national trends, remaining relatively well-funded and affordable for students.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




New General Assembly Has Much To Do Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Justices to visit Beaufort county


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally
Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history
given to illegals in Mexico before they even get to US: NGOs connected to Mayorkas

HbAD1

 
Back to Top