N. C. Court of Appeals restricts school searches | Eastern North Carolina Now | The N. C. Court of Appeals today (7-18-11) expanded the protection of students from non-particularized intrusive body searches.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This article originally appeared in the Beaufort Observer.

    The N. C. Court of Appeals today (7-18-11) expanded the protection of students from non-particularized intrusive body searches. The case, In re. T.A.S., originated in Brunswick County. T.A.S. was a legal minor at the time she attended "the Academy" which is an alternative school to which a number of students are assigned because of behavior problems at their home school.

    Students are searched routinely by a metal detector as they enter the Academy. On this day the principal received a tip that "pills which would be unsafe for students" were being smuggled into the school. So the principal ordered all students to be searched. Students were held in the cafeteria after arriving at school and taken to a room one by one and searched by school staff. In addition to school staff, law enforcement officials (school resource officer) were present.

    Students were made to expose the contents of their bags and empty their pockets. Girls were required to pull out their bras away from their chest and shake to dislodge anything stuffed in the bra. T.A.S. was found to have Percocet in her clothes. She was charged and convicted in District Court with a controlled substance violation. She appealed to Superior Court to have the evidence suppressed and the charges dismissed. The Superior Court upheld the District Court verdict and she appealed to the Court of Appeals.

    The COA applied the traditional "balancing test" weighing the interest of the school in protecting students from dangerous substances against the degree of intrusiveness involved. The COA drew the line at the under clothing search.

    The court expressed the position that the search in question was too intrusive given that it was not particularized as to a specific student or even a particular substance. The Court held, inter alia that:

    Although schoolchildren have legitimate expectations of privacy and public school officials are state actors subject to the Fourth Amendment, the Court in T.L.O. explained that "the special needs of the school environment require assessment of the legality of such searches against a standard less exacting than that of probable cause." Id. at 333 n.2, 83 L. Ed. 2d at 728-29 n.2. Instead, the legality of a student search is governed by the reasonableness under the circumstances, which is a two-part inquiry: (1) was the action "justified at its inception"; and (2), was "the search, as actually conducted reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place." Id. At 341, 83 L. Ed. 2d at 734 (emphasis added)

    The Court went on to declare that a search warrant and probable cause is not usually required for school searches but rather than probable cause applied the reasonable standard. It said:

    The same standard applies here despite the presence of a law enforcement officer because, as found by the trial court, the search was conducted by school administrators and staff, and the school resource officer ‖n this role was limited to observation, as he did not participate in the actual search. See In re Murray, 136 N.C. App. 648, 650, 525 S.E.2d 496, 498 (2000) (holding search was conducted by school official where school resource officer "did not search the bag himself" or "conduct any investigation on his own," and therefore applying the T.L.O. reasonableness standard); see also In re J.F.M. in which a search is reasonable at its inception" when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating either the law or the rules of the school. Such a search will be permissible in its scope when the measures adopted are reasonably related to the objectives of the search and not excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student and the nature of the infraction.

    The COA went on to discuss the need for reasonable searches to be particularized particularly where the degree of intrusiveness is great, such as a strip search or search of underwear. The court called it a "quantum leap" for school officials to go from a non-particularized search of outer clothing and backpacks to underwear for a groups of students.

    The T.A.S. case is legally complex in that the COA addresses a number of issues, including drug testing for extra-curricular activities. Space here does not permit an adequate treatment of all of these issues but T.A.S. will no doubt be an important case for school administrators to study.

    One issue not addressed but one that is intriguing is the extra degree of privacy the COA affords to underwear. However, modern cultural standards have obviously changed as a trip to Wal-Mart would reveal (no pun intended). Many people, especially young people now exhibit the underwear quite freely these days. So is a bra that is substantially visible without removing any other clothing actually "underwear" as used in T.A.S. or not? How is a school official to judge a search to be "excessively intrusive" of a student's reasonable expectation of privacy when so many students free exhibit those articles of clothing that may be used as hiding places for contraband? It would appear it will take more cases before we have a definitive law on the issue, if in fact we ever will.

    You can read T.A.S.by clicking here.

    In other media reports it appears that school officials in Brunswick County do not intend to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Governing Beaufort County

Tonight, December 7, 2020, I will present to the Beaufort County Commissioners a Resolution for North Carolina Elections to make sure that coordinated, and widespread cheating never occurs to the extent that it did in this disgusting general election of so many states.
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services today released a report of the state’s monkeypox data, including how many vaccines have been administered across the state since July.
As Beaufort County's premier internet related company, Symbiotic Networks (SNI), we create the highest quality representation of the Beaufort County Commissioners' general meeting of August, 2022 to provide for the public's complete awareness of their most important local government.
The Beaufort County Jail Committee meeting that was scheduled for tomorrow, August 4, 2022, has been cancelled.
The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners will meet in regular session on Monday, August 1, 2022 at 5:30 PM in the boardroom located at 136 W. 2nd St, Washington, NC.
As Beaufort County's premier internet related company, Symbiotic Networks (SNI), we create the highest quality representation of the Beaufort County Commissioners' general meeting of July, 2022 to provide for the public's complete awareness of their most important local government.

HbAD1

Beaufort County's governing board of commissioners met June 28, 2022 to discuss a continuing issue of how to best handle solid waste here in Beaufort County by employing the concept of two "mega sites;" one on the north side of the Pamlico River, the other on the south side.
Tropical Storm Colin has weakened substantially over the last 24 hours, changing the rain and wind forecast for our area
The Beaufort County Finance Committee meeting that was scheduled for Tuesday, June 28, 2022 has been cancelled.
The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners will hold a special called meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 5:00 PM in the boardroom located at 136 W. 2nd St, Washington, NC.
Beaufort County's Commissioners met in a special session, May 31 2022, to continue the budgeting process, where the professed "Progressives" moved expediently to spend unwisely the People's money.
Beaufort County's Commissioners met in a special session, May 31 2022, to continue the budgeting process, and it got weird real fast if one knows the history within the politics of governing Beaufort County.

HbAD2

Beaufort County's Commissioners wrapped up the people's budget after a feigned attempt at some deliberations; none, however, were intended to be constructive by the majority.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top