When Trade is Free, There are only Surpluses | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Dr. Roy Cordato, who is vice president for research and resident scholar for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    One of the great myths bought into by much of the general public, politicians, and media pundits is that trade deficits are bad for the economy. The idea dates back to the pre-Adam Smith (1776) days of mercantilism and is ultimately based on the notion that it is better for an economy to have money - under mercantilism gold - than stuff, i.e., usable goods and services. This is why one often hears pundits worrying out loud about money "leaving the economy" for other countries, as if some foreigners were just flying over the U.S. with giant vacuum cleaners sucking cash out our wallets, piggy banks, and safe deposit boxes. The unstated flip side of this unfounded worry is that, as money flows out, the goods and services that we want and use flow in.

    The most recent manifestation of this is the handwringing coming from the White House and various pundits over the $60-billion-dollar trade deficit the United States has with Mexico. Allegedly, this is evidence that our southern neighbor is "taking advantage of us."

    All of this stems from a profound misunderstanding of what trade is all about and why the word "deficit" has no relevance to economic well-being. In the first instance, if a trade is undertaken freely, then both parties benefit. That's why the trade is made. The fact the two people making the trade live, or are doing business, on opposite sides of a political border does not change that fact. Neither party to the exchange experiences a deficit in any meaningful sense of the word. It is not like a budget deficit. At the end of the trade, neither party is indebted to the other.

    Both parties are actually experiencing a surplus, that is, they are both better off than before making the exchange. They value what they are getting more than what they are giving up. The exchange doesn't generate a deficit for one side and a surplus for the other but a surplus for both sides. Economist explicitly recognize this when they describe the result of free exchange as generating both consumer surplus and producer surplus. Again, the fact that the traders happen to live on opposite sides of a politically determined international border doesn't change this, and neither does aggregating all of the trades being made across these borders. With trade, the "surplus" on both sides of the border and the welfare of both countries is enhanced, regardless of which one is doing the selling and which is doing the buying.

    Let's examine the U.S.'s $60 billion deficit with Mexico. Assuming that none of that $60 billion is the result of coercion, that is, every American making those expenditures on goods produced in Mexico is doing so freely, then what this number implies is that American consumers, who are giving up $60 billion dollars to producers in Mexico, are receiving more than $60 billion dollars in value in return. The reason for this is that every one of those dollars spent by consumers is done so for one reason - they value the product they are purchasing more than the dollar they are giving up for it. In other words, while we may be running a trade deficit in terms of dollar outflow to Mexico, as implied by the previous analysis, we are running a trade surplus in terms of the value of goods and services we are receiving, and that is what is important to our well-being.

    This is the purpose of wanting dollars in the first place. They have no intrinsic value beyond the paper they are printed on (unless you choose to appreciate the artistic representations of a president/Founding Father on the front and a landmark on the back). Ultimately, we want to dispose of those dollars in exchange for the goods and services we really want. And we are happy when people, regardless of their nationality, willingly take them off our hands in exchange for those goods and services. Indeed, the reasons most of us want dollars in the first place is so we can go out and run a trade deficits with our local Food Lion or Best Buy.

    The word "deficit" gets in the way of a true understanding of trade relationships. Because of the term's negative connotations, it leads us to lose sight of the fact that trade is win-win. It puts a focus on one side of trading process implying that those who receive the money in a trade agreement are beneficiaries while those who receive the goods and services are somehow getting the short end of the stick.

    The point here is not to argue, contrary to the standard view, that trade deficits are good and trade surpluses are bad. Instead, it is to make the point that the entire taxonomy is meaningless and actually conveys nothing about what is good or bad for any economy. Properly conceived, there are no deficits when it comes to free trade, only surpluses. As such, any reference to trade deficits as being bad for a country betrays a fundamental ignorance of the nature of trade.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Democrats Conduct Their Plan in Unison. Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Appeals Court Hears Boyce's Complaint against State Bar


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed on Wednesday that the Biden administration was stopping the flow of illegal immigration into the U.S. through the southern border despite officials documenting millions of illegal border crossings.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy did not mince words following revelations this month of Biden family corruption from whistleblowers in the government.
Former President Donald Trump said that if he is elected president, he would pursue indictments against political opponents.
Three years ago this week, Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed a litany of bills passed by the state legislature that would’ve allowed some small businesses to reopen and communities to gather for fireworks during the COIVD pandemic’s government-imposed shutdowns.
President Joe Biden is allowing hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from Venezuela to stay and work in the U.S. as federal officials insist it would be unsafe for them to return home.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis laid down the law during a press conference on Wednesday when talking about reports that some people had tried to loot in the wake of a powerful hurricane that hit the state.


After receiving John the Baptist's head on a platter as requested, Herod's daughter started to wish she had just asked for a cute purse instead.
Disgraced former Biden Energy Department official Samuel Brinton pleaded “no contest” this week after being caught on video allegedly stealing luggage at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas.
The city of Raleigh is asking a federal court to drop the city from a High Point woman's lawsuit challenging her arrest during a 2020 COVID policy protest.
A top California plastic surgeon estimates that over the years President Biden has spent the equivalent of $100,000 in current dollars on plastic surgery, including a face and eyebrow lift.
LINCOLN, NE — According to multiple witnesses, hilarious comedienne Chelsea Handler burst into a family's living room to tell them she was totally happy being child-free and not at all miserable or anything.
Meteorologist Ryan Maue dumped cold water on CNN’s climate hysteria amid Hurricane Idalia’s brutal assault on Florida’s Gulf Coast early on Wednesday morning.



Back to Top