Due Process: Restoring a Fundamental Right on Campus | Beaufort County Now | Four years ago, brothers at the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity at UNC Wilmington (UNCW) brought campus due process-or lack thereof-into the sunlight. The young men had been accused of hazing and underage drinking

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Due Process: Restoring a Fundamental Right on Campus

    Publisher's note: The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal is a nonprofit institute dedicated to improving higher education in North Carolina and the nation. Located in Raleigh, North Carolina, it has been an independent 501(c)(3) organization since 2003. It was known as the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy until early January 2017.

    The author of this post is Jenna Robinson.

    Four years ago, brothers at the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity at UNC Wilmington (UNCW) brought campus due process-or lack thereof-into the sunlight. The young men had been accused of hazing and underage drinking. Although the students were eventually cleared of any wrongdoing, they endured an unfair and onerous investigation and adjudication process to prove their innocence.

    They brought their experience with UNCW's disciplinary process to the attention of the North Carolina General Assembly. As a result, North Carolina became the first state in the nation to protect due process for students and student organizations when then-Governor Pat McCrory signed the Students & Administration Equality (SAE) Act.

    Others states are beginning to follow North Carolina's lead.

    The SAE Act guarantees students and student organizations at public colleges and universities the right to counsel when they are accused of violating their institutions' disciplinary or conduct rules. It also mandates that the institution report the number and type of disciplinary proceedings it initiates.

    Joe Cohn, legislative and policy director at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, has said of the SAE Act, "[It] is sorely needed because today's colleges and universities operate what amounts to their own parallel justice system, albeit without the meaningful due process protections provided in our nation's courts."

    During the first six months after the Act was passed, 119 students across the UNC system chose to have legal representation at disciplinary hearings. Such choice was generally impossible before the passage of the Act.

    One reason that states are moving to protect due process comes from the U.S. Department of Education. In April 2011 the Department's Office for Civil Rights issued a now-infamous "Dear Colleague Letter" instructing colleges and universities to use the lowest possible standard of proof in sexual assault cases. This "preponderance of evidence" standard means that accusers need only prove that a particular fact or event was slightly more likely than not to have occurred. This is far different than proving something "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is standard in criminal cases outside a university campus.

    Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos signaled earlier this month that she plans to revisit OCR's sexual assault regulations. But until then, the "Dear Colleague Letter" guides campus action. In addition to changing evidentiary standards, the letter discourages cross-examination of accusers, strongly suggests that institutions accelerate adjudications to take place within a 60-day limit, and allows accusers to appeal not-guilty findings. The possibility of appeal for accusers subjects defenders to a kind of "double jeopardy" not allowed in criminal cases.

    It is in this environment that other states have moved to follow North Carolina by passing their own due process protections. Arkansas and North Dakota have passed legislation similar to the SAE Act, and legislators in Massachusetts and Virginia have proposed similar policies.

    In Utah, proposed changes goes further. There, Rep. Kim Coleman (R) and Sen. Todd Weiler (R) have sponsored legislation that would give students the right to active counsel as well as add requirements to the adjudication process. The bill would require parties to make good-faith efforts to exchange evidence and would allow students and their advocates to make opening and closing statements and to present and question witnesses.

    Interestingly, legislators in North Carolina have plans to bolster the protections offered by the SAE Act. House Bill 777, which stalled in committee this year, included provisions that mirror Utah's legislation.

    The bill would require universities to give accused students "adequate notice including details of the allegations...and copies of all evidence at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner." It would also permit both parties in a case to question and cross examine witnesses. And in a clear departure from federal policy, it states that the "standard of proof of responsibility for proving sexual misconduct shall not be less than clear and convincing evidence."

    These examples from North Carolina and other states show that momentum is building to restore due process on campus. State action can ensure that students are free from arbitrary, onerous, and unfair campus courts-and strengthen the rule of law promised to all Americans in the U.S. Bill of Rights.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Josh Hammer writes for the New York Post that conservatives have focused too much attention on the U.S. Supreme Court.
New report shows that the state’s outreach and data strategies led to substantial increase in vaccination rates among Black and Hispanic people
Ollie Mulligan, this week from an airport somewhere in the Northeast, talked about his upcoming flight home, about returning to his native Ireland, to County Kildare.
Do you believe that to try to negotiate and make concessions will only further erode the precarious existence that already threatens the integrity of our once-great republic?


Last week, a familiar story played out in the book publishing world.
Today, Governor Roy Cooper visited Gates County to see more North Carolinians receive their vaccine at the county health clinic run by Albemarle Regional Health Services
We will offer this allotment of three with more to come; some old, most new, but all quite informative, and, moreover, necessary to understanding that in North Carolina, there is a wiser path to govern ourselves and our People.
Jonathan Turley writes for The Hill about concerns stemming from recent legal action against former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.


Yet Leftists are spending trillions of dollars to fight a non-existent problem they cannot change no matter what they do.


Back to Top