Courts will get Another Crack at Legislative Districts | Eastern North Carolina Now

The House and the Senate finally passed redistricting maps after weeks of contentious committee meetings and public hearings

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Lindsay Marchello, who is an associate editor for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

House and Senate enact redistricting plan, just beating court-ordered Sept. 1 deadline


    The House and the Senate finally passed redistricting maps after weeks of contentious committee meetings and public hearings.

    A three-judge U.S. District Court panel gave the General Assembly a Sept. 1 deadline to present new legislative maps after the court ruled the districts enacted in 2011 were an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The court will decide whether to accept the new maps for the 2018 election. Whatever the panel decides, the losing party could appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    The Senate took up House Bill 927 during a brief session Wednesday with Sen. Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell, arguing the bill meets the criteria established by both the House and Senate redistricting committees.

    "I think it is important to note these maps were drawn without the consideration of race and individuals were not assigned a district on the basis of their race," Hise explained.

    Nevertheless, Sen. Angela R. Bryant, D-Halifax, urged legislators to reject the bill, citing concerns of racial gerrymandering and incumbency protection.

    "There are also some state constitutional concerns with this map," Bryant argued, pointing to a lack of compactness in several counties and violations of the provision requiring counties not to be split when possible.

    Bryant also cited districts in Wake and Mecklenburg counties which were not affected by the court decision but still redrawn. She said this violates the constitutional provision forbidding redistricting outside the 10-year census cycle unless ordered by the court.

    "Why we would position ourselves for these challenges? I can't understand given what we've been facing in the cost of litigation we have already been through in multiple courts that struck down these maps under some of these same complaints," Bryant questioned.

    Despite the concerns of Democratic lawmakers, the bill passed 30-15.

    House Democrats voiced similar criticisms over Senate Bill 691, but like the House bill, S.B. 691 passed 68-47.

    Rep. David R. Lewis, R-Harnett, said race was not considered when drawing up the new maps and said the bill remedies any racial disparities pointed out by the court ruling.

    "I believe our map complies with traditional redistricting principles outlined by the court," Lewis said.

    Some lawmakers called for the creation of an impartial redistricting commission and argued the people of North Carolina should draw the lines.

    "In short, politicians who directly benefit from the drafting of legislative districts should not be the drafters of those districts," Rep. Joe John, D-Wake said. "We absolutely must have in North Carolina a truly independent, impartial, and most importantly nonpartisan redistricting commission."

    Rep. Carla Cunningham, D-Mecklenburg, criticized Republican lawmakers for not considering race when drawing new district lines. She also questioned whether Republicans were willing to share power.

    "Are you ready to share power? That is what redistricting is about," Cunningham argued. "The people of North Carolina are looking at us to learn how to share power."

    Rep. Nelson Dollar, R-Wake, fired back at some of the Democratic representatives' criticism.

    "You want proportional representation, then you need to go change the U.S. Constitution if that's what you want. If you want a European system, then go out there and get it," Dollar said. He alluded to the geographic distribution of voters in North Carolina, with Democrats gravitating toward cities and Republicans residing more in rural and suburban areas. "The fact is you have a misdistribution of voters and people willing to support you. That's your problem [and] you probably ought to try and solve if you want to solve it."

    Dollar also pointed out Senate Republicans won a supermajority in 2010 under maps drawn to favor Democrats.

    "Clearly, that was the will of the people," Dollar said.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




GOP is Right to Worry about Trump's Performance Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Gov. Cooper Takes Action to Keep Gas Available Despite Shortages Caused by Hurricane Harvey


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.
would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm

HbAD1

"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top