Here Are Trump's Two Best Defenses To The Cohen Campaign Finance Allegations | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: This informational nugget was sent to me by Ben Shapiro, who represents the Daily Wire, and since this is one of the most topical news events, it should be published on BCN.

    President Trump is the world's worst client. He speaks when he should shut up; he doesn't listen to his lawyers; he takes action that exacerbates legal difficulties. The most irritating aspect of this unfortunate tendency is that Trump actually has a couple of robust legal defenses with regard to the accusation that he violated campaign finance law by paying off his paramours. Those defenses come in two forms.

    1. Trump Didn't Intend To Break The Law. Under the law, criminal liability for campaign finance violations attaches only if you intended to violate the law. This requires a certain level of baseline knowledge of the law. But Trump could easily say that he relied on his attorney, Michael Cohen, to know the law - he's not a lawyer. Now, Trump was intimately involved, according to Cohen, with setting up the structure for the passage of the cash. But there's no evidence of that so far, other than Cohen's testimony. Jan Baran, a GOP finance lawyer, explained to Politico: "In order to prove criminal intent, you have to point to evidence that the actors knew or had reason to know what they were doing was illegal." Baran pointed out that even players in the field aren't sure whether Trump's payoffs were even governed by campaign finance law, given that they could be construed as personal expenditures. "If that many people don't know what the law means, then it can be very hard to convict anybody of violating a campaign finance law."

    2. Trump Didn't Break The Law. This is the case made by former FEC chairman Bradley Smith, who argues that Trump's payoffs to the ladies were actually personal expenditures. Writing in The Washington Post, he stated:

    However, regardless of what Cohen agreed to in a plea bargain, hush-money payments to mistresses are not really campaign expenditures. It is true that "contribution" and "expenditure" are defined in the Federal Election Campaign Act as anything "for the purpose of influencing any election," and it may have been intended and hoped that paying hush money would serve that end. The problem is that almost anything a candidate does can be interpreted as intended to "influence an election," from buying a good watch to make sure he gets to places on time, to getting a massage so that he feels fit for the campaign trail, to buying a new suit so that he looks good on a debate stage. Yet having campaign donors pay for personal luxuries - such as expensive watches, massages and Brooks Brothers suits - seems more like bribery than funding campaign speech.

    In other words, Trump's attempts to "influence an election" isn't enough to label an action a campaign finance issue. The counterargument would be FEC language regarding the applicable test: "if the expense would exist even in the absence of the candidacy or even if the officeholder were not in office, then the personal use ban applies." In other words, it's only a personal expenditure if Trump would have paid for it regardless of the context. Trump may have a defense here: he pays off women all the time. Then he'd have to show evidence that's true.

    No matter what, Trump doesn't help himself by talking here. He has lawyers for this. He should use them. But Trump's biggest problem is his own ego. If he just admitted that he doesn't know the law and delegated it to Cohen, or states that he pays off women for sex on a routine basis - both of which are both credible and likely true - he'd be off the hook. But does he have the humility to recognize it?
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

When It Comes To Investigating Corruption, Should Republicans Simply Act Like Democrats And Protect Their Own? Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Amending the NC Constitution: The Six Proposed 2018 Ballot Initiatives


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a confidential report this week that 2.5 tons of natural uranium have gone missing from a site in Libya that is not controlled by the government.
Multiple reports out of the U.S. Thursday indicated that Long John Silver's is still a thing. Experts confirmed their findings that the fast-food seafood restaurant, which is an actual thing, is in fact still in existence.
SVB Financial Group, the parent company of now-defunct Silicon Valley Bank, is considering bankruptcy as a possible mechanism to sell its other assets, according to a Wednesday report from Reuters.
RALEIGH: Today, Governor Roy Cooper toured Dawnsha’s Loving Childcare #2 in Greenville and highlighted his recommended budget investments in child care to support children, families and businesses.
After a train carrying highly toxic chemicals derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, President Joe Biden hopped on Air Force One, transferred to a train and went to … Ukraine.
Well, the day has finally arrived: your cute little parasitical clump of cells has popped out of one of the birthing persons in your relationship, and it's now suddenly a real human being. But what gender is it? It's hard to say. It could even be - fingers crossed - trans!
Officials with the United States Surface Transportation Board approved the merger of Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited on Wednesday, marking the first combination of major rail companies in two decades.


Republican Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson said that he doesn’t consider himself a politician but rather a public servant, as he delivered the Republican response to Gov. Roy Cooper’s final State of the State address on Monday night.
General Mark Milley said Wednesday that he was not prepared to consider Russia’s downing of an American drone to be an act of war. “Incidents happen,” he said.
Author and podcast host Sam Harris said author and Daily Wire host Candace Owens “should not” have opinions on subjects like the vaccine, climate change, or the war in Ukraine, adding that people should also not listen to her about such matters.
A treasure hunter made the find of his life with a metal detector, unearthing medieval gold jewelry and silver coins in the Netherlands, the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities recently announced.
“Tiger King” star Joe Exotic might be serving time in federal prison, but that is not stopping him from exploring his political ambitions — he’s announced a run for president in 2024.
RALEIGH: Today, Governor Roy Cooper, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kody H. Kinsley and NC Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Secretary LtGen Walter Gaskin toured the Creative Academy Early Learning Center in Goldsboro to highlight the (MCCYN)-PLUS
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink told investors on Wednesday that the asset management company views climate change as a risk to portfolio companies.
While at his first job interview with a prospective employer Thursday, local man Justin Rasberger was crestfallen to learn that "quoting Monty Python" does not count as relevant job experience, and in fact is not currently considered a "marketable skill" among employers.


Back to Top