Selective Tax Breaks Are Unwise | Eastern North Carolina Now

Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal, and written by John Hood.

Spirit AeroSystems, the largest tenant of the Global TransPark, has received millions in tax subsidies but failed to reach job-creation targets. | Photo: Don Carrington/Carolina Journal

    Conservative North Carolinians believe that lower taxes translate into higher levels of economic growth and personal freedom. So they like the declines in both income- and sales-tax burdens that have occurred since 2011, while Republicans have been in charge of the North Carolina General Assembly. Progressives, of course, strongly disagree.

    While the partisan and ideological lines are easy to see on this issue, it's hardly the only tax-policy dispute in state politics. Another one concerns depth vs. breadth.

    To maximize economic growth and job creation, some argue that North Carolina should focus any tax relief on key companies or industries. Other argue that North Carolina's economy will fare better if policymakers favor across-the-board tax policies over targeted incentives.

    In this dispute, opinions range across philosophical boundaries. One of the most vocal proponents of large tax cuts aimed at specific corporations is Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper. Indeed, he's been a devotee since his legislative days as a powerful committee chairman and Senate Majority Leader.

    A vocal critic of North Carolina's incentive programs, or at least how they are currently structured, is Republican lawmaker Harry Brown, the current (albeit retiring) Senate Majority Leader. He's tried without success to pass legislation to limit the amount of incentives routed to companies in fast-growing urban counties.

    "If you look back at the history - the reason incentive programs were created - it was to really help the poor parts of the state," Brown told WRAL-TV's Tyler Dukes. "It wasn't to help the counties that were already doing well. It's evolved to just the opposite."

    According to reporting by Dukes, about 60 percent of all incentives pledged over 10 years from North Carolina's two largest programs, the Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) and the One North Carolina Fund, went to companies in just two counties, Wake and Mecklenburg.

    That should come as no surprise. Scholars from across the political spectrum have been studying such programs for decades and usually reach the same conclusions. First, targeted tax incentives don't produce much in the way of net job creation, despite exaggerated claims to the contrary. Second, tax incentives flow disproportionately to places with lower unemployment rates and higher average incomes.

    In a new study to be published this year in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, economists Cailin Slattery of Columbia University and Owen Zidar of Princeton University provide additional support for these propositions. While incentives may sometimes influence location decisions for recipient companies, "we do not find strong evidence that firm-specific tax incentives increase broader economic growth at the state and local level," Slattery and Zidar write.

    It isn't just that incentive deals tend to happen in places that are already growing faster than average, although their study does show that. The study also documents a tradeoff between incentives and overall tax rates - between depth and breadth, in other words. "High-incentive states have higher tax rates on average," Slattery and Zidar write. "The social cost of higher taxes grows quickly with the size of the tax and the benefits of incentives diminish with the size of incentives."

    By national standards, North Carolina is far from incentive-crazy. Our grants programs aren't as lavish. Correspondingly, our overall tax rates are lower - in fact, North Carolina has the lowest tax rate of any state that taxes corporate income, although we compare less favorably when it comes to taxes on business equity or property, where North Carolina's franchise tax is relatively onerous.

    For decades, I've criticized targeted tax incentives. I've supported their abolition, by whatever means proved practicable - by negotiation, legislation, or litigation. I haven't changed my mind. But if we're to be stuck with this substandard tax policy, I'd at least like to see North Carolina policymakers restrict the size and scope of incentives along the lines Sen. Brown has proposed.

    At a bare minimum, I'd take more candor and consistency on the part of public officials. If Gov. Cooper truly believes North Carolina's tax burden is too low, shouldn't he stop making incentive deals?

    John Hood (@JohnHoodNC) is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on "NC SPIN," broadcast statewide Fridays at 7:30 p.m. and Sundays at 12:30 p.m. on UNC-TV.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Voter ID Issue a ‘No-Win’ Situation for Attorney General, Political Expert Says Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Voter ID Will Be Reinstated in Time for the General Election


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador accused the Pentagon of spying on Mexico’s government, vowing to safeguard classified military information to protect its national security after a spate of documents leaked in U.S. media.
Despite his success in interpreting previous dreams regarding an upcoming famine in the land, sources say Joseph is unsure about what to tell Pharaoh about his dream where he's standing in front of everyone in his underwear and they're laughing at him.
America is in freefall. Cities are crumbling, with open drug abuse and homeless everywhere, overdose deaths are soaring, there’s a mental health epidemic, and then there are the crises, oh the crises: the border, the federal debt, lack of affordable housing, flat-out unaffordable health care.
On Tuesday, the House Health Committee will consider several bills that critics say are likely to raise insurance costs for consumers.
Governor and Council of State will see primary competition between conservatives and RINOs
Montana trans lawmaker Zooey Zephyr, formerly known as Zachary Raasch, feels strongly that he has nailed his audition as Bud Light's next spokesperson after leading loud demonstrations in the Montana State Capitol last week.
Former President Barack Obama claimed that since he left the White House in January 2017, the divided media was the thing that truly kept him up at night.


Back to Top