Watchdog Group Says That Two North Carolina Counties Have More Registered Voters Than Voting-Age Citizens | Eastern North Carolina Now

Publisher's note: This post, by Andy Jackson, was originally published in Civitas's online edition.

    A national watchdog alleges that the Guilford and Mecklenburg county board of elections are in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and has threatened to sue the counties and the NC State Board of Elections if they do no comply by early March.

    Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation that seeks to promote "transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law," notified the boards in letters dated December 11.

    Here are the specific charges against the Guilford County BOE:

  • The County has a total registration rate of 102%. To be clear, the number of voter registrations exceeds the number of citizens in the County who are old enough to register to vote.
  • There are about 72,000 inactive voter registrations on the County's rolls, or about one out of every five registrations.
  • The County reported removing only about 3400 voter registrations per year in the last reporting period on the grounds that the registrants failed to respond to an address confirmation notice and failed to vote in two consecutive federal elections. This is a very low number of removals for a county of this size.

    And the charges against the Mecklenburg County BOE:

  • The County has a total registration rate of 107%. To be clear, the number of voter registrations exceeds the number of citizens in the County who are old enough to register to vote.
  • There are about 115,000 inactive voter registrations on the County's rolls, or about 16% of all registrations.
  • The County reported removing only about 11,000 voter registrations per year during the last reporting period on the grounds that the registrants failed to respond to an address confirmation notice and failed to vote in two consecutive federal elections. This is a very low number of removals for a county of this size.

    I checked voter registration in those two counties using Civitas' Carolina Elections voter registration database and other data sources. As of January 4, Mecklenburg County had 736,168 voter registrations while Guilford had 358,960. The problem is that the Census Bureau estimates that Mecklenburg County only has about 693,740 voting-age citizens while Guilford County only has about 371,190. In other words, both counties have more registered voters than they have voting-age citizens.

    The over-registration in Mecklenburg and Guilford counties persists despite prior work in both counties to remove inactive registrations from the voter rolls. The last period of large-scale voter list maintenance (sometimes called purges) in North Carolina took place in early January 2019, during which North Carolina had a net loss of 576,534 voter registrations (a decline of about 8.1 percent). During that same period, Mecklenburg County had a net loss of 50,373 registrations (a 6.7 percent decline) and Guilford had a net loss of 32,032 registrations (an 8.5 percent decline). While the Mecklenburg County rate of decline was below the state average, it does not appear to be unusually so and may be due to high levels of net in-migration.

    (It would be inaccurate to say that voters are purged during list maintenance; the registrations are removed because the people associated with them have not been voting in the county in which they are registered.)

    I reached out to the North Carolina, Mecklenburg, and Guilford boards of elections for their reactions to the allegations. While neither of the county boards was able to reply in time for this post, the state board's public information officer, Patrick Gannon, sent me a copy of a 2017 letter from the Executive Director Kim Strach to Judicial Watch addressing similar charges.

    Gannon also stated via email: "North Carolina's State and County Boards of Elections comply with all federal and state laws pertaining to list maintenance activities. We are preparing a thorough response to the Judicial Watch letter and will release it when it is complete."

    It appears that neither side is going to back down, so North Carolina may be treated to yet another election-related lawsuit ahead of the 2020 general election.

    For your further reading pleasure, here are list maintenance procedures from the NC Board of Election.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Did You Know? The State of Federal Student Loans Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics 2020 Set for Epic End of Decade Battle for State Senate


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

given to illegals in Mexico before they even get to US: NGOs connected to Mayorkas
committee gets enough valid signatures to force vote on removing Oakland, CA's Soros DA
other pro-terrorist protests in Chicago shout "Death to America" in Farsi
Only two of the so-called “three Johns” will be competing to replace Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) as leader of the Senate GOP.

HbAD1

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) is looking into whether GoFundMe and Eventbrite cooperated with federal law enforcement during their investigation into the financial transactions of supporters of former President Donald Trump.
Turkish diplomatic sources say he did
Popularity of government leader crashes, even among his own party members.
Wisconsin voters ban private money, nonprofits from the election process after 2020 ‘Zuckerbucks’ controversy; spotlight now on 22 states that still allow it.
6 month old baby fighting for life after mother killed; policewoman finally arrives, shoots knifeman

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top