Republican Lawmakers Defend N.C. Voter ID Law in Court | Beaufort County Now | Three years after the N.C. electorate decided to add a voter identification requirement to the state constitution, Republican lawmakers are defending voter ID in court.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Three years after the N.C. electorate decided to add a voter identification requirement to the state constitution, Republican lawmakers are defending voter ID in court.

    A multiday trial started Monday, April 12, in a lawsuit challenging the state's 2018 voter ID law, Senate Bill 824. Lawmakers approved that law to implement the constitutional requirement. Critics say the voter ID law unfairly targets black voters.

    "At the close of evidence, plaintiffs believe that you'll agree with us that the mountain of circumstantial evidence is so overwhelming that no alleged neutral justifications can overcome that mountain," said Allison Riggs of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. She's the lead attorney representing plaintiffs in the case.

    "At the end, you'll conclude that North Carolina once again enacted an unconstitutional law — a voter ID law designed to keep black voters from the ballot box," Riggs added during her nearly 45-minute opening argument.

    The law's defenders pointed to some inconvenient facts for Riggs and her clients. Among those facts: Some black Democrats voted for the disputed bill. "You wouldn't see this support from Democrats, from African-American Democrats, if [S.B.] 824 really were weaponized for political entrenchment of the opposing party," said David Thompson, an attorney representing Republican legislative leaders.

    Legislative Republicans also mounted a defense of the law in the court of public opinion.

    "The requirement for photo voter ID is in the North Carolina Constitution: In 2018, North Carolina voters opted to amend their Constitution to require photo voter ID," according to a news release from Sen. Paul Newton, R-Cabarrus. "Reasonable people can have reasonable disagreements about whether voter ID is a good policy, but that debate is over. The Constitution requires voter ID."

    "The law implementing voter ID was sponsored by an African-American Democrat," Newton's release added. "News coverage of the voter ID law almost always quotes left-wing activists who accuse the bill sponsors of racism. Yet that coverage almost never informs readers that one of the bill sponsors is an African-American Democrat. Reporters should take care to note that fact, not bury it."

    "The voter ID law is among the most permissive in the country," according to the GOP release. "The law provides for free IDs to anybody who wants one. It permits a litany of ID options, from driver's licenses to college IDs to tribal IDs and more. Any voter who does not have a photo ID can still fill out a 'reasonable impediment' form and cast a ballot. More restrictive laws in other states have already passed court muster."

    "Voter ID laws improve confidence in the electoral process," Newton's release adds. "Polling shows dangerously low confidence that the 2022 election will be 'free and fair,' and it's true across all ideologies. Voter ID makes voters more confident in elections, and failing to implement voter ID after the people amended their own Constitution to require it shatters confidence."

    A three-judge panel is hearing arguments for and against the 2018 voter ID law. It's not clear when the panel will issue a ruling.

    State and federal lawsuits blocked implementation of voter ID in North Carolina during the entire 2020 election cycle. That's despite 2 million voters (55% of the total) supporting voter ID in a November 2018 referendum to place the requirement within the N.C. Constitution.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Voters in Robbinsville, a tiny town in North Carolina’s last dry county, have approved the sale of beer and wine, according to unofficial results Tuesday.
The White House was forced to intervene Friday and walk back claims President Joe Biden made during a town hall event on Thursday night, admitting that the administration is “not pursuing” using the National Guard to solve the supply chain crisis
Let's be frank ... a lot of us have been leery of Facebook and its cabal of programmers, administrators, promoters, fact-checkers, and even its creator, and many have even walked away from the liberal platform.
We will offer this allotment of three with more to come; some old, most new, but all quite informative, and, moreover, necessary to understanding that in North Carolina, there is a wiser path to govern ourselves and our People.
In a previous research brief, I wrote about how existing nuclear power plants produce “zero emissions while at the same time being the most reliable and lowest-cost source of electricity.”
We have reached a critical juncture in our nation’s history. As once hallowed institutions decay before our eyes, parallel structures struggle to arise.


On Tuesday, November 2, The N.C. House voted along party lines in favor of its new House election district map, while the N.C. Senate approved new congressional maps.
No longer the "friendly opposition", the Liberal "ying" to the more studious, more insightful "yang"; no, not the least bit worthy of such.
After the horrific brutality in Waukesha, Wisconsin, in which a man rammed his SUV into marchers in a Christmas parade, causing the deaths of at least six people, including a small child and injuries to scores of others, many media outlets eschewed calling what happened an attack.
Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, has vetoed a bill to limit his powers as a governor, as well as the power of his successors.
In every state studied! Rare such research is so profound. Our education system lied to us.
The reasoning behind the bill, as laid out in the bill’s language, is that “too many North Carolina citizens have no or inadequate savings for retirement.”


Back to Top