Lawmaker Born In USSR Grills Merrick Garland: ‘The FBI Is Starting To Resemble Old KGB’ | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This older, but yet to be published post is finally being presented now as an archivable history of the current events of these days that will become the real history of tomorrow.

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daily Wire News.

    Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN), who was born in the Soviet Union, grilled U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday over the actions that the FBI is allegedly taking and over a variety of security concerns that have erupted under President Joe Biden's administration.

    "Mr. Attorney General, as someone who was born in the Soviet Union, I am disturbed, very disturbed, by the use of the Department of Justice as a political tool, and its power as the police state to suppress lawful public discourse," she said. "The FBI is starting to resemble old KGB with secret warrantless surveillance, wiretapping, and intimidation of citizens. School board [inaudible] is the latest example."

    "It's interesting that during the Soviet-era, the United States criticized the use of the domestic terrorism concept in the USSR as a tool to suppress free speech and political dissent," she continued. "In your recent statement opposing the Texas anti-abortion law, you said it is the foremost responsibility of the Department of Justice to defend the Constitution. Do you plan to defend the Second Amendment rights which are explicitly protected by our Constitution as vigorously as you do abortion rights? Yes or no?"

    Spartz later pressed Garland over alleged abuses of FISA warrants by federal law enforcement officials, Biden's border crisis, and Biden's disastrous pullout from Afghanistan.

    Watch:

    As someone who grew up in the USSR, I'm disturbed that FBI is starting to resemble KGB - intimidation, surveillance, suppression of dissent... AG Garland @TheJusticeDept also didn't firmly reassure us that they will keep Americans safe in light of the border & Afghanistan crises.

    TRANSCRIPT:

    REP. VICTORIA SPARTZ (R-IN): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Attorney General, as someone who was born in the Soviet Union, I am disturbed, very disturbed, by the use of the Department of Justice as a political tool, and its power as the police state to suppress lawful public discourse. The FBI is starting to resemble old KGB with secret warrantless surveillance, wiretapping, and intimidation of citizens. School board [inaudible] is the latest example. It's interesting that during the Soviet-era, the United States criticized the use of the domestic terrorism concept in the USSR as a tool to suppress free speech and political dissent. In your recent statement opposing the Texas anti-abortion law, you said it is the foremost responsibility of the Department of Justice to defend the Constitution. Do you plan to defend the Second Amendment rights which are explicitly protected by our Constitution as vigorously as you do abortion rights? Yes or no?

    MERRICK GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL: Yes.

    SPARTZ: Do you believe recent inspector general FISA report, citing widespread and material non-compliance by the FBI with[out] proper due process for surveillance of U.S. citizens, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment?

    GARLAND: I think it's a violation of the FISA Act by itself without even having to get to the Constitution. And we take this extraordinarily seriously. That's why we have an inspector general. That's why our National Security Division reviews what the FBI does with respect to FISA. And I know that the FBI Director takes this very seriously as well. And they have made major fixes to their practices so this won't occur again. And this is constantly being audited and reviewed by our National Security Division. I take this very seriously. And I agree, we have to be extremely careful about surveillance of American citizens, only as appropriate under the statute.

    SPARTZ: Potentially Fourth and Fifth Amendment could be violated if you have-

    GARLAND: Of course.

    SPARTZ: -material and widespread as the report says. In your June 15th remarks on domestic terrorism, you said that nearly every day you get a briefing from the FBI director and his team. How often do you discuss FISA relations in your briefings?

    GARLAND: Sorry, I didn't hear the-

    SPARTZ: How often do you discuss the FISA violations when you get your nearly daily briefings with FBI?

    GARLAND: So, there's a quarterly review by the Intelligence Community and the National Security Division submits to the intelligence committees with respect to FISA reviews. And I always review those, I meet with the National Security Division relatively routinely to discuss how that's going. So, it's not every morning, but this review of violations of FISA, and our efforts to make sure that it doesn't happen again, is pretty frequent.

    SPARTZ: So it seems like we still get material and widespread ever reported. We have material, 'material,' not non-material and widespread violation. But talking about another topic, I went to the border three times and recently visit airbase and Qatar and Camp Atterbury in Indiana, housing of Afghanistan evacuees. And based on what I've seen, I have some questions and significant national security concerns. Former Border Patrol chief Rodney Scott recently said that the open border poses a real terror threat. Do you agree with the Border Patrol chief or Secretary Mayorkas, who recently said that the border is no less secure than before?

    GARLAND: If you're asking about terrorism traveling across the border, I'm concerned about that across all of our borders. This has been a continuing concern.

    SPARTZ: But do you agree with that, you know, Border Patrol chief that what's happening right now is make us less secure and have a real, you know, increased terror threat?

    GARLAND: I believe that combination of the Intelligence Community and the FBI are working very hard to make sure that people crossing the border do not constitute a terrorist threat. But we have to always be worried about the possibility, and we are ever vigilant on that subject.

    SPARTZ: Can you reassure the American people that you will be able to protect our country from a terrorist attack that may result from this lawlessness at the border or the Afghanistan debacle?

    GARLAND: I can assure the American people that the FBI is working every day to do the best it possibly can to protect the American people from terrorism from whatever direction it comes, whether it comes from Afghanistan or any other direction.

    SPARTZ: Do you have any specific actions and plans that you do in light of what's happening right now at the border? Do you have a specific strategy that you're working directly with [inaudible]?

    GARLAND: I'm sorry, I didn't mean talk [over]-

    SPARTZ: Yeah, considering current situation on the border. Do you take any specific actions at the border?

    GARLAND: Well, with respect to the first part of your question about Afghanistan, the FBI is participating along with Homeland Security and vetting the refugees who have landed in various locations, Qater, Kosovo, Ramstein Air Base, and then bases in the United States. So they're doing everything they can to vet for those purposes. With respect to crossing of the border, this is a combination of the Intelligence Community outside of our intelligence community getting information about who might be trying to cross.


poll#157
Was it a judicious ploy for Joe Biden's FBI to execute the unprecedented raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate?
  Yes; the Cheneys despise this former Republican president, and for good reason ... so they say.
  No; never has a former president been treated with this level of vindictive abuse by those temporarily in power.
  Who cares? It's Trump.
932 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#154
Inarguably, the policies of the Democrats in congress and Joe Biden as the Executive is plunging the United States into a recession, if we are not already there; a recession that was completely avoidable. Will abrupt changes in policies occur in time?
  Yes, the Democrats have a bold plan, yet to be revealed, to save us.
  No, there will have to be a complete undoing of the damage done by these Democrats.
  I can't do simple math, so how am I to understand the concept of basic economics.
1,216 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




WATCH: Condoleezza Rice Shreds Critical Race Theory On ‘The View’ Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Republicans land recruits for Wake N.C. Senate seats

HbAD0

 
Back to Top