Berger, Moore say they’ll fight to reinstate N.C. abortion laws blocked by Roe/Casey | Eastern North Carolina Now | UPDATE at 4 p.m. June 24: Joint letter from Berger and Moore demand Attorney General Josh Stein “”take all necessary legal action to lift the injunction currently barring the full enforcement of our State’s abortion restrictions.”

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is David Larson.

    UPDATE at 4 p.m. June 24: Joint letter from Berger and Moore demand Attorney General Josh Stein ""take all necessary legal action to lift the injunction currently barring the full enforcement of our State's abortion restrictions." Senate Leader Berger added, "Attorney General Josh Stein must immediately act to enforce North Carolina's 20-week abortion ban. Any hesitation or dereliction to do so betrays our most vulnerable and is not in the best interest of North Carolinians."

    Both of North Carolina's top legislature leaders - House Speaker Tim Moore, R-Cleveland; and Senate Leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham - vowed to fight to reinstate the abortion laws on the books, some of which were blocked by federal precedent in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

    Statements by both also indicated they have no plans for further abortion-related legislation before the end of the current session, which is likely to end in a matter of days.

    Berger spokesperson Lauren Horsh told CJ that they have to ask Attorney General Josh Stein to seek action overturning prior court rulings that nullified state laws based on Roe and Casey. If he does not take this action, they said they are prepared to look at other options. A separate U.S. Supreme Court opinion, on Berger v. NAACP, decided on June 23 that North Carolina legislators could represent the state to defend state laws. This could become relevant if Stein refuses to work to reinstate the abortion laws in the state statutes.

    Berger's and Moore's statements can be read below:

    Moore's full June 24, 2022, statement:

    "Today's decision from the United States Supreme Court is long overdue and a major win for protecting life!" Moore said in his statement. "The end of Roe v. Wade rightfully returns authority back to the states to determine abortion law. While I remain unequivocally pro-life, the short budget adjustment session does not afford us sufficient time to take up the issue. However, North Carolinians can rest assured that we are taking the necessary steps to ensure that current restrictions on the books will be enforced. North Carolinians can also expect pro-life protections to be a top priority of the legislature when we return to our normal legislative session in January."

    Berger's full June 24, 2022, statement:

    "The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs returns policy decisions regarding abortion to the states, which is where those decisions should be made. I remain committed to the right to life and protecting the unborn. North Carolina's law banning abortions after 20 weeks is currently unenforceable. We will take immediate action to ensure North Carolina's late-term abortion ban is reinstated. Senate Republicans will determine whether other steps are appropriate to strengthen our pro-life laws, but I do not anticipate legislative action prior to adjournment."

poll#152
With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
248 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#150
With respect to the leaked opinion not yet written for ratification regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's revisiting the original decision of Roe v Wade, whence now nonstop protests have erupted in neighborhoods where U.S. Supreme Court justices live, exhibiting the firm intent to intimidate these officers of the highest court in the land: What action should the federal authorities take?
  Do nothing ... Protests are a fixture of a free society.
  Enforce the law ... Federal codes exist to prohibit any intimidation through the pubic harassment of federal judges, especially Supreme Court justices.
  I have no idea, however, northern Virginia School Board Members must be shielded from protests at all costs.
335 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The N.C. Sheriffs’ Association is not taking the recent violence against deputies across the state lying down. After a seventh deputy was killed or injured by gunfire in a three-week period, they are offering an $100,000 reward for information that leads to the capture.
Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration is reportedly gathering data on an oil pipeline in Michigan to determine if shutting it down would further increase fuel prices in the region.
Researchers at Yale University are challenging the idea of irreversible cardiac death after new technology tested on pigs restored some of the animals’ heart and brain cells an hour after dying.
President Biden just solved the economy by creating thousands of IRS jobs! We know you've always dreamed of working for the IRS, but do you have what it takes?
Teach yourself to be disobedient to bad orders

HbAD1

Is the legacy media ever embarrassed or angry that it consistently gets fed false information — and repeats it verbatim — in order to push anti-conservative narratives, or does it enjoy being a mouthpiece for the government?
A U.S. federal appeals court issued a stay on Saturday temporarily halting Democrat President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate that would have required companies with at least 100 employees to get vaccinated for the coronavirus or be tested weekly.
After a critically acclaimed first season that was allegedly watched by some people, the producers of the January 6th Hearings have sadly confirmed that their star Liz Cheney will not be returning for season 2.
Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis slammed doctors who perform transgender surgeries on young children during a press conference this week, saying that they needed to be held legally liable for their actions.
A fired Durham police sergeant is asking the N.C. Supreme Court to permit his lawsuit accusing the city of violating his state constitutional rights.

HbAD2

The U.S. Department of Justice is moving to unseal more documents related to the raid on former President Donald Trump’s home in Florida but will not unseal the underlying FBI affidavit because it claims that doing so will damage the ongoing criminal investigation.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top