Al Sharpton Tells MSNBC The Pro-Life Movement Has ‘Hijacked The Bible And Jesus’ | Eastern North Carolina Now

Rev. Al Sharpton appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” with Joe Scarborough on Monday to claim that pro-life Christians have “hijacked” the Bible and Jesus.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Dillon Burroughs.

    Rev. Al Sharpton appeared on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" with Joe Scarborough on Monday to claim that pro-life Christians have "hijacked" the Bible and Jesus.

    Sharpton shared the remarks in response to the Supreme Court's recent ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade and return laws regarding abortion to states.

    "I am incensed and insulted they have hijacked the Bible and Jesus to distort and misquote, well it's not even a misquote - create quotes that are not there to justify a right-wing kind of ideology that would take away the rights of women and then scheduled to take other people's rights," Sharpton told Scarborough, according to Newsbusters.

    "And what is strange to me, Joe, they can see a scripture that is not there about abortion but they couldn't see love your neighbor when it came down to putting things through that would help the poor and help the needy," he added.

    Sharpton also criticized progressives for not turning out to vote in the 2016 presidential election.

    "Well, look at what you got. What did you think would happen? You gave Trump three seats on the Supreme Court," Sharpton argued. "You helped do this as much as that distorted Christian language, and we need to aggressively take both of you on and say step to the side and let folks that are clear-sighted and clear-minded save this country."

    The conversation clearly included an emphasis on "the fight to protect reproductive rights in this country."

    Sharpton has often advocated for pro-choice views, including his support for Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), a black pro-choice pastor elected in 2021. Sharpton argued that the victory signaled the end of "legal apartheid."

    "Here we have in the state of Georgia, a state deep in the heart of the old Confederacy, a state that voted to elect America's first black vice-president in November, and a state that just voted to elect the Democratic Party's first black senator. What does that mean about where this country is after four years of Donald Trump?" MSNBC host Scarborough asked Sharpton in January.

    "It means that this country has really come back unto showing that we're not going backwards to the days of legal apartheid or segregation and divisiveness," Sharpton responded.

    MSNBC has also regularly blasted pro-life views. In September, the network hosted civil rights attorney Jill Colleen Jefferson and her radical comparison regarding pro-life Americans.

    "Having the right to an abortion is a constitutional right; it's grounded in the right to privacy that is within the Constitution," Jefferson wrote.

    She later compared those holding a pro-life view to suicide bombers.

    "What it reminds me of, quite honestly, is a suicide bomber - someone who feels like they have the right and the moral duty to mess up somebody else's life for the greater good," Jefferson added.

poll#152
With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
586 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#150
With respect to the leaked opinion not yet written for ratification regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's revisiting the original decision of Roe v Wade, whence now nonstop protests have erupted in neighborhoods where U.S. Supreme Court justices live, exhibiting the firm intent to intimidate these officers of the highest court in the land: What action should the federal authorities take?
  Do nothing ... Protests are a fixture of a free society.
  Enforce the law ... Federal codes exist to prohibit any intimidation through the pubic harassment of federal judges, especially Supreme Court justices.
  I have no idea, however, northern Virginia School Board Members must be shielded from protests at all costs.
549 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Democrats Falsely Accuse Kavanaugh, Gorsuch Of ‘Lying Under Oath’ About Roe V. Wade Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Tesla Closes Down Office In California


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.
would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm

HbAD1

"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top