Biden Administration Sues Arizona Over Proof Of Citizenship Requirement For Federal Elections | Eastern North Carolina Now | The Biden administration sued Arizona on Tuesday over a state law requiring voters to show proof of citizenship before casting a ballot in a presidential election.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Tim Pearce.

    The Biden administration sued Arizona on Tuesday over a state law requiring voters to show proof of citizenship before casting a ballot in a presidential election.

    Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed into law in March a bill mandating that voters show documentary proof of citizenship in order to vote by mail or vote in a federal election. The Department of Justice challenged the law in court, arguing that the mandate is redundant and unconstitutional.

    "House Bill 2492's onerous documentary proof of citizenship requirement for certain federal elections constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act," Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said in a statement.

    "Arizona has passed a law that turns the clock back on progress by imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections," Clarke added.

    The DOJ's Civil Rights Division is leading the lawsuit. The lawsuit argues that the Arizona law violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which requires that voters before participating in a federal election fill out a federal form. While the form does not require documented proof of citizenship, it does ask under penalty of perjury whether or not one is a citizen.

    Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich responded to the lawsuit in a post on Twitter: "It's another round of Brnovich v. Biden as his DOJ continues its attempts to undermine our election integrity laws. I will see you in court. Again."

    Ducey signed House Bill 2492 into law on March 30, describing the bill as a "balanced approach that honors Arizona's history of making voting accessible without sacrificing security in our elections." The law is set to go into effect in January 2023.

    "Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections. Arizona law prohibits non-citizens from voting for all state and local offices, and requires proof of citizenship," Ducey said in a letter. "H.B. 2492 provides clarity to Arizona law on how officials process federal form voter registration applications that lack evidence of citizenship."

    According to Ducey's office, 11,600 federal-only voters cast a ballot in the 2020 election without having to show documented proof of citizenship, as is required for state elections.

    Arizona has required documented proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections before, though the previous law was struck down by the Supreme Court. In 2004, Arizona residents voted in favor of Proposition 200, which required all Arizona voters to provide proof of citizenship before casting a ballot in any election.

    The Supreme Court in struck down the law in a 7-2 decision. The court's opinion, written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the ballot measure violated the NVRA and barred Arizona "from requiring a Federal Form applicant to submit information beyond that required by the form itself."

    Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the opinion, writing that the majority's interpretation of the law conflicted with states' constitutional authority "to determine the qualifications of voters in federal elections, which necessarily includes the related power to determine whether those qualifications are satisfied."

    "To avoid substantial constitutional problems" created by the majority's interpretation of the NVRA, Thomas wrote, "I would construe the law as only requiring Arizona to accept and use the form as part of its voter registration process, leaving the State free to request whatever additional information it."
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

N.C. Republican Congressional delegation outraged at FBI raid on former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in Florida.
The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money
A federal magistrate judge has ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to respond to requests to make public the warrant authorizing the FBI’s unprecedented Monday raid of former President Donald Trump’s residence.

HbAD1

New Zealand Prime Jacinda Ardern smiled during an interview late last week when saying that she was effectively creating two different classes of people in her country that have different levels of freedom depending on whether they are vaccinated.
On Tuesday, Democrats filed an emergency motion to stay federal Judge James Dever’s decision last week to order the North Carolina State Board of Elections to place the Green Party’s candidates on the ballot.
Communist China threatened to shoot down Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) plane on Friday if the 82-year-old lawmaker tries to visit Taiwan.
those 87,000 new auditors will be hard asses
China accused the White House of lying when it claimed President Joe Biden pressed Chinese President Xi Jinping on the country’s systematic abuse of Uyghur Muslims when the leaders spoke by phone Thursday morning.
Former President Donald J. Trump was seen fleeing on a golf cart while shouting defiantly at federal agents Monday. Witnesses claim he led authorities on a daring chase that reached speeds of up to 30 Mph.

HbAD2

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President, on Sunday over a new letter from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)

HbAD3

 
Back to Top