In The Name Of Equity, The ACLU Supports Racial Discrimination In College Admissions | Eastern North Carolina Now | In the name of equity, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced on Monday that it supports allowing colleges to racially discriminate when deciding the admission of certain applicants.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Tim Meads.

    In the name of equity, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced on Monday that it supports allowing colleges to racially discriminate when deciding the admission of certain applicants.

    The ACLU reported that it had filed amicus curiae briefs in two cases before the United States Supreme Court, Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, both of which challenge whether or not higher education can legally consider race in its application approval process.

    "Ending the consideration of race in college admissions would ignore the country's ongoing challenge of racial inequality and threaten diversity and inclusion on campuses everywhere," Sarah Hinger, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Racial Justice Program, said in a press release.

    "Race-conscious admissions practices help create a diverse student body and enrich the educational experiences of all students," Hinger argued. "The Supreme Court's holdings have recognized this for decades, and we urge the court to protect universities' ability to consider race in the admissions process."

    The ACLU also tweeted, "All students deserve equitable access to higher education."

    Proponents of race-based admissions claim that it helps minorities, but opponents point out that such policies often harm Asian Americans.

    "It's been argued that Asian Americans have to score as much as 450 points higher on the SAT to have a similar chance of admission as black students," Kenny Xu, author of "An Inconvenient Minority," wrote in 2021. "In 2020, Duke economics professor Peter Arcidiacono found that a black student in the fourth-lowest academic decile has a higher chance of admissions than an Asian in the top decile."

    "Harvard disproportionately scores Asian Americans the lowest on 'personality' to justify this discrimination - a case of blatant snobbery not backed up by data: Asians score just as well as whites and other minorities in alumni interviews," Xu noted.

    In reaction to the ACLU's support for affirmative action, columnist David Marcus tweeted, "I want to see the head of the @aclu sit down with the Asian kid whose immigrant parents operate a small bodega that can't go to Harvard even though he earned it and explain why it's for the best. Not best for him maybe, but for somebody else."

    Legal experts like Alex Deise, an attorney and policy manager at FreedomWorks, have also argued that the two cases present an opportunity for the High Court to undo decades of bad legal precedent.

    "By taking these cases, the Supreme Court has a historic opportunity to eliminate the ability of colleges and universities to explicitly discriminate on the basis of race in their admissions process," Deise told The Daily Wire in January.

    Deise noted that a 2003 case that allowed affirmative action to stand was not only not based on the Constitution, but it was also a bad way to stop race-based discrimination.

    "The Court made a serious mistake in Grutter v Bollinger (2003) when it upheld these processes under the false notion that the educational benefits from a diverse student body was more important than the Equal Protection Clause's central command of race neutrality," he added. "The Court should overrule Grutter and heed Chief Justice Roberts advice from a similar case that '[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.'"

poll#154
Inarguably, the policies of the Democrats in congress and Joe Biden as the Executive is plunging the United States into a recession, if we are not already there; a recession that was completely avoidable. Will abrupt changes in policies occur in time?
  Yes, the Democrats have a bold plan, yet to be revealed, to save us.
  No, there will have to be a complete undoing of the damage done by these Democrats.
  I can't do simple math, so how am I to understand the concept of basic economics.
1,180 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Visitors To World’s Tallest Tree Could Now Face Six Months In Jail And $5,000 Fine Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Woman Who Accused Chris Cuomo Of Sexual Misconduct Blasts NewsNation For Hiring Him


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Netherlands is world's second largest exporter of food by value
A new poll shows that Republican voters put Florida Governor Ron DeSantis at the top of deep list of politicians they want to see influence the party’s direction.
Davis Patterson, a bystander during a shooting that left a dozen dead, has been arrested for misgendering the shooter, Blake Jacobson, who is non-binary.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk announced a blanket amnesty for Twitter users permanently suspended from the platform.
With rising interest rates, experts expect the U.K. to remain in a recession into 2024
CNN host Alisyn Camerota and a guest on the network struggled with the gender non-conforming identity of the Colorado “Club Q” shooting suspect.

HbAD1

U.S. State Department officials defended themselves Sunday after awarding Ecuador a grant of over $20,000 for a cultural center to host drag shows for LGBTQ communities in the South American country.
The N.C. Home Builders Association is sharing its concerns about a recent court ruling against an Ashe County asphalt plant.
says schools are for education, not indoctrination
Former Trump administration economic adviser Larry Kudlow blasted President Joe Biden, accusing him of lying about the state of the economy.
President Joe Biden announced his intention to push for new gun control legislation in the lame-duck session of Congress.
Wondering why people actually still vote for Democrats? Believe it or not, there are still Democrat voters out there and we've compiled their top reasons for doing so!

HbAD2

Two NBA players were ejected from a game over the weekend after they engaged in a fight that ended up in the stands.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top