Elon Musk Reveals How Twitter’s Business Is Doing Under His Leadership | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ben Zeisloft.

    Business is booming at Twitter with respect to new users after the social media platform was purchased by Elon Musk, according to the billionaire entrepreneur, even though a significant number of advertisers have backed away from the company at the behest of activist groups.

    Investor slides shared by Musk say that the daily inflow of new users has reached two million, while "user active minutes per day" likewise reached eight billion. The company now has more than 250 million monetizable daily active users, Musk says. All three metrics exceed previous company records.

    Musk has been attempting to avoid impersonations by selling verification subscriptions for $8 per month, a policy that has repeatedly been reversed and reintroduced. The slides said that reported impersonations spiked after he took control of the company before falling once again.

    The slides also show that purported hate speech impressions have been lower since Musk acquired the platform. Musk, who claimed he purchased Twitter to promote free expression and peaceful dialogue across the political spectrum, revealed last week that the company is still defining hate speech with "the same list of terms" implemented before the acquisition.

    Musk also hinted at a number of new offerings from "Twitter 2.0," including enhanced video content, long-form tweets, encrypted direct messages, and entertaining advertisements.

    Account impersonations and Musk's endorsement of some conservative figures have provoked ire among left-wing nonprofits, some of whom recently pressured advertisers to cease their relationship with the social media company. Several organizations endorsed a letter to the executives of major advertisers claiming that "extremists" consider the takeover "a new opportunity to post the most abusive, harassing, and racist language and imagery," including "clear threats of violence against people with whom they disagree."

    According to a report from left-wing organization Media Matters, one of the groups that signed the letter, as many as 50 of the top 100 advertisers on Twitter have "either announced or seemingly stopped" their campaigns on the platform. The companies have spent $2 billion on the platform over the past two years.

    "Twitter has had a massive drop in revenue, due to activist groups pressuring advertisers, even though nothing has changed with content moderation and we did everything we could to appease the activists," Musk confirmed earlier this month. "Extremely messed up! They're trying to destroy free speech in America."

    The world's richest man initially told advertisers that he acquired Twitter to "have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner, without resorting to violence." He vowed that the social media platform would not become a "free-for-all hellscape" where users could breach the law with impunity.

    Musk has remarked that widespread coverage of the acquisition and his subsequent attempts to reform the company, including negative reports from mainstream outlets, has contributed to usage reaching record levels. He said his number-one priority is the removal of child exploitation content from Twitter, which previous management neglected to accomplish. Several advertisers paused campaigns on the platform two months ago after a report showed that child sexual abuse material had appeared alongside major advertisers' profiles.

poll#128
Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?
  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.
  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.
  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".
476 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




‘Error In Judgment’: Bob Dylan Apologizes For Auto-Pen Fiasco, Blames Vertigo And COVID Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Pence Calls On Trump To ‘Apologize For’ Dining With Holocaust Denier At Mar-A-Lago


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse

HbAD1

Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship

HbAD2

One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better

HbAD3

 
Back to Top