Manhattan DA Responds To Demands From House Republicans Investigating Trump Case | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daniel Chaitin.

Publisher's Note: This series of posts on this one issue - The Unprecedented FBI Raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago Estate - can all be found here on ENC NOW.

    The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg shot back on Thursday at House Republicans who opened an investigation this week into the potential indictment of former President Donald Trump, arguing they lack a "legitimate basis" for their inquiry.

    Leslie Dubeck, the in-house general counsel for the prosecutor who is investigating Trump over alleged hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election cycle, called the lawmakers' demands for communications, documents, and testimony "an unprecedent inquiry into a pending local prosecution."

    Their requests, Dubeck wrote, "are an unlawful incursion into New York's sovereignty. Congress's investigative jurisdiction is derived from and limited by its power to legislate concerning federal matters."

    House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY), and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil (R-WI) sent the letter to Bragg on Monday in response to reports indicating that an indictment against Trump was imminent. Their letter warned of "an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority: the indictment of a former President of the United States and current declared candidate for that office."

    Trump said over the weekend he expected to be arrested on Tuesday and called on his supporters to protest. A spokesperson for the former president later said Trump received no "notification" other than "illegal leaks" to the media - likely referring to reports about law enforcement preparing for the possibility of an indictment.

    In Bragg's response to GOP congressional leaders, Dubeck said their inquiry "only came after Donald Trump created a false expectation that he would be arrested the next day and his lawyers reportedly urged you to intervene."

    "Neither fact is a legitimate basis for congressional inquiry," Dubeck added in the letter, which was posted online by Punchbowl News.

    Dubeck cited a New York Times report that said a lawyer for Trump, Joseph Tacopina, wrote to Jordan last month calling on Congress to investigate the "egregious abuse of power" by what he described as a "rogue local district attorney."

    In conclusion, Dubeck said Bragg's team "will not allow a Congressional investigation to impede the exercise of New York's sovereign police power," but noted his office "will always treat a fellow government entity with due respect." To that end, Dubeck added, Bragg's team has requested a "meet and confer to understand whether the Committee has any legitimate legislative purpose in the requested materials that could be accommodated without impeding those sovereign interests."

    Trump, who announced a third campaign for the White House in November, claims Bragg's inquiry is politically motivated and denies any wrongdoing. An indictment may come as early as next week, as the grand jury is not expected to return to the Trump case until at least Monday, according to ABC News.

    Jordan announced Wednesday night that he was expanding his probe in Bragg by sending inquiries to Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz, prosecutors leading the Trump investigation who resigned last year over frustrations that Bragg was being too hesitant to pursue an indictment at that time.

    "Alvin Bragg should focus on prosecuting actual criminals in New York City rather than harassing a political opponent in another state," The House Judiciary Committee, which is led by Jordan, tweeted after news of Bragg's response letter broke. "Make Manhattan Safe Again!"

Was it a judicious ploy for Joe Biden's FBI to execute the unprecedented raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate?
  Yes; the Cheneys despise this former Republican president, and for good reason ... so they say.
  No; never has a former president been treated with this level of vindictive abuse by those temporarily in power.
  Who cares? It's Trump.
857 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Considering what many of the most revered legal experts of this age consider a political persecution by the infamous and ignoble New York District Attorney Alvan Bragg: Should the historic, unprecedented indictment of 45th President Donald Trump be considered as a benefit, or a liability to the sustainability of OUR Constitutional Republic?
  Liability, our nation is in peril, as we are losing our "Rule of Law" integrity.
  Benefit, losing our "Rule of Law" integrity is secondary to destroying Donald Trump.
  I mostly worry about losing my Tik Tok.
87 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Dudes Have Been Dominating Women’s History Month This Year Daily Wire, News Services, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal Ford Projects Its EV Division Will Lose Billions This Year


Latest State and Federal

Fox News is reportedly set to replace its entire primetime lineup with three of the network’s biggest hosts, according to a new report.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration finalized its recommendations to expand eligibility for blood donation to include gender-inclusive, individual risk-based questions to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted HIV.
President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) each said on Tuesday that they made progress on debt ceiling negotiations, indicating thaws in an impasse as the nation faces a possible debt default in two weeks.
Congressmen Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Lance Gooden (R-TX) issued a joint letter calling attention to the potential use of federal funds to enable illegal immigration into the United States.
When the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on our state’s voter ID law on April 28th, the justices only had to answer one narrow question: “[Does the voter ID law] violate the meaningful protections set forth in Article I, Section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution?”
A top House Republican wants the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to clarify what is happening with the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden after lawyers for a whistleblower within the agency claimed his team got removed from the case.
Fox News settled a bombshell defamation suit stemming from the 2020 election by paying Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million just hours after the the beginning of a trial that would have seen some of the cable news behemoth’s biggest stars take the witness stand.
North Carolina Republicans voted to override Democratic Governor Roy Cooper’s veto of a 12-week abortion ban, using their supermajority to put the pro-life measure into law.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) defended the tentative agreement on the debt ceiling he made with President Joe Biden during a press conference Sunday after criticism from some Republicans on the concessions, saying the deal is “worthy of the American people.”


Back to Top