Still “Yes” to Campus Carry | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is William Gilmore.

    The debate over whether guns should be permitted on college campuses has been contentious for many years. Some argue that allowing firearms in higher-education institutions can lead to increased violence and accidents, while others contend that such a policy enhances personal safety and promotes responsible gun ownership. With "campus carry" back in the news (in West Virginia, Georgia, Michigan, and elsewhere), now is a good time to restate the case for responsible gun possession on campus.

    Enhanced Personal Safety

    One of the primary reasons proponents advocate for guns on college campuses is the potential to improve personal safety. With incidents of campus shootings and violence becoming an increasing concern, allowing law-abiding, trained individuals to carry firearms could act as a deterrent to potential attackers. In a crisis situation, armed individuals could respond swiftly, potentially minimizing the harm caused by an active shooter.

    This is especially true because, in some instances, college campuses are located in remote or rural areas where law-enforcement response time can be prolonged. Allowing guns on campus could serve as an interim measure to bridge the gap between an emergency situation and the arrival of police.

    Respect for Individual Liberties

    Supporters rightly argue that prohibiting guns on college campuses infringes upon individual liberties and the right to self-determination. By allowing guns, institutions demonstrate their commitment to respecting the Constitution and the principles of personal freedom.


    Furthermore, when trained individuals are allowed to bring guns on college campuses, they have the opportunity to take responsibility for their own safety. Empowering students, faculty, and staff with the ability to protect themselves fosters a sense of security, reducing anxiety about potential threats.

    Significantly, campus-carry policies often come with stringent requirements, including background checks, safety courses, and mandatory training sessions. This ensures that only responsible gun owners are permitted to carry firearms.

    Legal Consistency and Fiscal Considerations

    In a number of states, the law allows individuals with concealed-carry permits to bring firearms onto public property, including college campuses. Allowing guns on even private campuses aligns with these state laws, ensuring consistency and continuity in firearm regulation.

    Finally, some proponents argue that permitting guns on college campuses can lead to cost savings by reducing the need for additional security personnel. Instead of relying solely on campus police, a well-trained and armed campus community may aid in maintaining its own security.

    Whether guns should be allowed on college campuses is a complex and multifaceted issue. (The Martin Center has weighed in on several occasions: here, here, and here.) While there are valid arguments on both sides, proponents of campus-carry policies emphasize the potential for increased personal safety, the empowerment of individuals, and a growing respect for individual liberties. While public safety, student well-being, and the preservation of academic environments should remain the top priorities in addressing this contentious issue, strict regulations can ensure responsible gun ownership and mitigate potential risks.

    William Gilmore is a business student at Thales College and a summer '23 Martin Center intern.
Go Back


Latest State and Federal

Former police officer Derek Chauvin was charged with yet another appalling atrocity today after allegedly assaulting a fellow inmate's shiv with his body while serving time for the 2020 death of George Floyd.
X owner Elon Musk said on Saturday that he would be filing a lawsuit against leftist outlet Media Matters for America over a story it ran this week that he said was misleading and intended to undermine free speech.
Lee County Sheriff Brian Estes is asking a federal judge to dismiss him as a defendant in a lawsuit challenging the rollout of North Carolina's eCourts record management system.
One of New Jersey’s main teachers unions is calling for the end of the basic skills test for certifying teachers.
Jewish celebrities blasted TikTok after a surge of viral anti-Semitic content on the platform surfaced following the Hamas terrorists attacks on Israel that resulted in the deaths of more than 1,200 people.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis attacked tech executives this week for “groveling” to Chinese communist dictator Xi Jinping this week as he appeared in San Francisco for a meeting with President Joe Biden and California Governor Gavin Newsom.


A newly released poll that was conducted at the start of the month by the Arab World for Research and Development found that the overwhelming majority of Palestinians supported the October 7 terrorist attacks against Israel and hate the United States.
North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls has recently filed a lawsuit against the North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission, alleging the commission has aimed to stifle her First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
The GOP-led House began on Friday to release tens of thousands of hours of video footage from January 6, 2021 — the day of the U.S. Capitol breach — to the public.
A former Fox News producer is suing the network, saying it fired him due to his “refusal to report false information,” such as concerns about harmful effects of COVID vaccines.
Arizona State University canceled an event that the school was set to host on Friday featuring Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), which comes after she openly expressed support for the elimination of the state of Israel.


A teacher at an Illinois high school sought to exclude students who allegedly opposed the school’s transgender bathroom policy from meetings of the school’s “Diversity” club.


Back to Top