Judge Rules Texas Law Shielding Minors From ‘Sexually Oriented’ Performances Violates First Amendment | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Leif Le Mahieu.

    A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the implementation of a Texas law banning "sexually oriented" performances in front of minors.

    Judge David Hittner of the Southern District of Texas said that the law violated the First Amendment and chilled free speech in the state. The ruling blocks a law signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott in June. The law has been called a "drag ban" but applies to any sexually oriented performance.

    "Not all people will like or condone certain performances," Hittner wrote. "This is no different than a person's opinion on certain comedy or genres of music, but that alone does not strip First Amendment protection. However, in addition to the pure entertainment value there are often political, social, and cultural messages involved in drag performances which strengthen the Plaintiff's position."

    Hittner, who was appointed by Ronald Reagan, said that the law "impermissibly infringes on the First Amendment and chills free speech."

    He said it would be reasonable to assume that other activities, like cheerleading, dancing, or live theater, could become a crime if the law takes effect.

    According to the law, "A person who controls the premises of a commercial enterprise may not allow a sexually oriented performance to be presented on the premises in the presence of an individual younger than 18 years of age." It would have allowed violators to be fined up to $10,000.

    "I am relieved and grateful for the court's ruling," said Brigitte Bandit, a drag performer who sued to stop the law from taking effect. "My livelihood and community has seen enough hatred and harm from our elected officials. This decision is a much needed reminder that queer Texans belong and we deserve to be heard by our lawmakers."

    The law, introduced by state Senator Bryan Hughes (R), also banned cities or counties from authorizing a sexually oriented performance on public property.

    "Surely we can agree that children should be protected from sexually explicit performances. That's what Senate Bill 12 is about," Hughes said. "This is a common sense and completely constitutional law, and we look forward to defending it all the way to the Supreme Court if that's what it takes."

poll#164

It has been far too many years since the Woke theology interlaced its canons within the fabric of the Indoctrination Realm, so it is nigh time to ask: Does this Representative Republic continue, as a functioning society of a self-governed people, by contending with the unusual, self absorbed dictates of the Woke, and their vast array of Victimhood scenarios?

  Yes, the Religion of Woke must continue; there are so many groups of underprivileged, underserved, a direct result of unrelenting Inequity; they deserve everything.

  No; the Woke fools must be toppled from their self-anointed pedestal; a functioning society of a good Constitutional people cannot withstand this level of "existential" favoritism as it exists now.

  I just observe; with this thoughtful observation: What will happen "when the Vikings are breeching our walls;" how do the Woke react?

845 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?